Michael Vrbensky and Matteo Martineau will play each other in the qualifications of the Hamburg Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 4:00 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Vrbensky who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Michael Vrbensky is the pick to win this match.
Michael Vrbensky -> 1.58
Matteo Martineau -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Michael Vrbensky vs. Matteo Martineau
There is no head to head record between Michael Vrbensky and Matteo Martineau since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Michael Vrbensky
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-15 | 4-3 | 19-9 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 58-28 | 11-6 | 44-21 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 54-27 | 7-3 | 37-16 | 10-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 17-24 | 2-1 | 14-21 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-15 | 2-2 | 14-10 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 363, Vrbensky got to the qualifications after beating Niklas Schell 7-62 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Schell (7-62 6-4). During the match, Vrbensky scored 87 points vs Schell’s 68. Michael was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Vrbensky bagged 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Michael Vrbensky was extremely efficient on serve to win 80% (33/41) of his 1st serve and 61% (17/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Vrbensky broke Schell twice after converting 20% of his break points (2/10).
Vrbensky has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 60% of his matches (185-123). 6-4 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Vrbensky has an overall28-20 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Vrbensky’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Bern,M25+H Kassel,M25 Szabolcsveresmart and M15 Budapest.
The Czech has an aggregate 50-24 win-loss record in 2022, 6-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Hamburg Challenger
Michael has never competed in this tournament before.
Matteo Martineau
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-20 | 0-1 | 7-10 | 12-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-36 | 0-1 | 23-17 | 18-15 | 0-0 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 36-31 | 2-1 | 23-20 | 11-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-26 | 4-4 | 27-15 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 4-3 | 7-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 6-3 |
Ranked no. 456, the French player reached the qualifications after defeating Kelsey Stevenson 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Matteo had a good straight sets win against Stevenson (6-3 6-3). During the match Martineau scored 62 points vs Stevenson’s 45. Martineau was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Martineau made 6 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Matteo Martineau was very efficient on serve to win 83% (29/35) of his 1st serve and 63% (5/8) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Martineau broke Stevenson 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
The French player best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Muttenz.
Matteo has a composed 32-29 win-loss record in 2022, 7-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vrbensky | Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 18 |
| Pts | 87-68 | 62-45 |
| Total Points | 155 | 107 |
| Winners | 33 | 29 |
| %Winners | 38% | 47% |
Both Vrbensky and Martineau played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Vrbensky and Martineau have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Vrbensky played 5 games more than Martineau. Vrbensky scored 33 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The French player managed to score 29 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vrbensky | Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 6 |
| 1st in | 41/69 | 35/43 |
| %1st in | 59% | 81% |
| 1st pts | 33/41 | 29/35 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 5/8 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 63% |
Vrbensky managed to score 7 aces . Martineau recorded 6 aces . Vrbensky won 80% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Martineau won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vrbensky | Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/10 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 20% | 44% |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 67% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Michael broke his opponent twice with a 20% conversion rate. Michael lost his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Martineau conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Vrbensky | |||
| Q1 Schell |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 87-68 | 87-68 | |
| Total points | 155 | 155 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 41/69 | 41/69 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 33/41 | 33/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 17/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 2/10 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Martineau | |||
| Q1 Stevenson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 62-45 | 62-45 | |
| Total points | 107 | 107 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 35/43 | 35/43 | |
| % 1st in | 81% | 81% | |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 29/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWLWWW
LLWLWWLLLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kai WehneltWehnelt – Jeremy JahnJahn (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Mats MoraingMoraing (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hazem NaowNaow – Julian LenzLenz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Jelle SelsSels (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Henri SquireSquire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
