Julian Lenz and Hazem Naow will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Hamburg Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 4:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Julian Lenz who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Julian Lenz is the pick to win this match.
Julian Lenz -> 1.4
Hazem Naow -> 2.77
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Julian Lenz vs. Hazem Naow
There is no head to head record between Julian Lenz and Hazem Naow since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Julian Lenz
17 - 18win/loss
500
227
LWWWWLWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 19-19 | 2-2 | 7-10 | 7-5 | 1-1 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 19-30 | 2-2 | 9-15 | 5-12 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2020 | 8-13 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 3-2 |
| 2019 | 48-27 | 4-1 | 22-14 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 9-3 |
| 2018 | 25-20 | 2-1 | 16-11 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 5-4 |
Ranked no. 440, Julian reached the qualifications after beating Mikalai Haliak 7-65 6-3.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Haliak (7-65 6-3). During the match, Lenz scored 87 points vs Haliak’s 74. Lenz was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lenz blasted 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Julian Lenz lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Lenz put 62% of his first serves in, winning 67% (30/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. Julian broke Haliak 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Lenz has winning record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (197-151). 4-4 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lenz has an overall 34-38 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The German has a composed 16-18 win-loss record in 2022, 4-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Hamburg Challenger
Hazem Naow
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|
Ranked no. 605, Naow got to the qualifications after defeating Elmar Ejupovic 6-4 3-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Syrian defeated Ejupovic (6-4 3-6 6-3). During the match Naow scored 110 points vs Ejupovic’s 102. Naow was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about serving, Naow made 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Hazem Naow lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Naow put 68% of his first serves in, winning 73% (44/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. Naow broke Ejupovic 3 times after converting 20% of his break points (3/15).
Hazem’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Monastir.
Naow has a compiled 21-13 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lenz | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 28 |
| Pts | 87-74 | 110-102 |
| Total Points | 161 | 212 |
| Winners | 30 | 44 |
| %Winners | 34% | 40% |
Both Lenz and Naow played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Hazem Naow dropped 1 set while Julian Lenz hasn’t dropped a set so far. Lenz has played 1 set(s) less than Naow (2 vs 3). Therefore, Lenz played 6 games less than Naow. The German scored 30 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The Syrian scored 44 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lenz | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
| 1st in | 45/73 | 60/88 |
| %1st in | 62% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 30/45 | 44/60 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 14/28 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 50% |
Lenz blasted 4 aces . Naow recorded 3 aces . Lenz won 67% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Naow won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lenz | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/10 | 3/15 |
| % Converted | 50% | 20% |
| Conceded | 5 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 40% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
The German broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Lenz surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Naow broke his opponent 3 times with a 20% conversion rate. Hazem conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lenz | |||
| Q1 Haliak |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 87-74 | 87-74 | |
| Total points | 161 | 161 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 45/73 | 45/73 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 30/45 | 30/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 14/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Naow | |||
| Q1 Ejupovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 110-102 | 110-102 | |
| Total points | 212 | 212 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 60/88 | 60/88 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 44/60 | 44/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 14/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/15 | 3/15 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kai WehneltWehnelt – Jeremy JahnJahn (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Mats MoraingMoraing (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hazem NaowNaow – Julian LenzLenz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Jelle SelsSels (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Henri SquireSquire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
