Terence Atmane and David Poljak will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Vilnus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 3:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Terence Atmane who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Terence Atmane is the pick to win this match.
Terence Atmane -> 1.78
David Poljak -> 1.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Terence Atmane vs. David Poljak
There is no head to head record between Terence Atmane and David Poljak since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Terence Atmane
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-14 | 12-8 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-27 | 26-10 | 26-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 78-30 | 71-23 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-22 | 23-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-10 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 370, Atmane reached the qualifications after defeating Robert Strombachs 6-4 4-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, The French player defeated Strombachs (6-4 4-6 6-4). During the match, Atmane scored 102 points vs Strombachs’s 95. The French player was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Regarding the service games, Atmane managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Terence Atmane lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Atmane put 64% of his first serves in, winning 77% (44/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (12/32) on the 2nd serve. Atmane broke Strombachs 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Atmane has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 61% of his matches (92-59). 2-1 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Atmane has an aggregate2-2 match record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
Terence’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Monastir.
Terence has an aggregate 59-25 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Vilnus Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
David Poljak
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-11 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2023 | 10-15 | 7-11 | 3-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-30 | 6-4 | 8-10 | 25-15 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 38-28 | 15-12 | 12-12 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2020 | 22-13 | 16-7 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 421, the Czech reached the qualifications after defeating Julius Tverijonas 6-2 1-6 6-1.
In the qualifications, Poljak defeated Tverijonas (6-2 1-6 6-1). During the match Poljak scored 70 points vs Tverijonas’s 63. David was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Poljak blasted 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. David Poljak lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Poljak put 68% of his first serves in, winning 61% (30/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the 2nd serve. David broke Tverijonas 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Poljak’s best result of the season was getting to the final in Sultan.
The Czech has an overall 33-23 win-loss record in 2022, 19-8 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Atmane | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 22 |
| Pts | 102-95 | 70-63 |
| Total Points | 197 | 133 |
| Winners | 44 | 30 |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% |
Both Atmane and Poljak played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Terence Atmane conceded 1 set, while David Poljak lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Atmane and Poljak have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Atmane played 8 games more than Poljak. The French player scored 44 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Czech managed to score 30 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Atmane | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 3 |
| 1st in | 57/89 | 49/72 |
| %1st in | 64% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 44/57 | 30/49 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 61% |
| 2nd pts | 12/32 | 13/23 |
| %2nd pts | 38% | 57% |
Atmane fired 8 aces . Poljak recorded 3 aces . Atmane won 77% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 38% of the points. On the other side, Poljak won 61% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Atmane | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 44% | 63% |
| Conceded | 6 | 7 |
| Saved | 3 | 4 |
| % Saved | 50% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Atmane broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The French player dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Czech broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Poljak conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Atmane | |||
| Q1 Strombachs |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 102-95 | 102-95 | |
| Total points | 197 | 197 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 57/89 | 57/89 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 44/57 | 44/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/32 | 12/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Poljak | |||
| Q1 Tverijonas |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 1-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 70-63 | 70-63 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 49/72 | 49/72 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 30/49 | 30/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWLLLWL
LLWWLWLLLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mirza BasicBasic – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jules MarieMarie – Yanki ErelErel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Luca PotenzaPotenza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Johan NiklesNikles – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit – Aldin SetkicSetkic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Alastair GrayGray (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Ernests GulbisGulbis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – David PoljakPoljak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ainius SabaliauskasSabaliauskas – Richard BerankisBerankis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
