Joris De Loore and Yuta Shimizu will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Busan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Joris De Loore who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Joris De Loore is the pick to win this match.
Joris De Loore -> 1.61
Yuta Shimizu -> 2.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Joris De Loore vs. Yuta Shimizu
There is no head to head record between Joris De Loore and Yuta Shimizu since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Joris De Loore
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-17 | 1-2 | 4-8 | 5-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-25 | 5-3 | 10-8 | 27-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-18 | 14-4 | 22-10 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-8 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 10-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 316, the Belgian got to the qualifications after defeating Min Jae Kim 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, Joris had a good straight sets win against Jae Kim (6-3 6-1). During the match, De Loore scored 60 points vs Jae Kim’s 38. Joris was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, De Loore made 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Joris De Loore lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, De Loore put 55% of his first serves in, winning 81% (21/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. De Loore broke Jae Kim 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
De Loore has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 65% of his matches (184-99). 12-3 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, De Loore has a composed61-24 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
The Belgian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Kiseljak and Bigorre.
Joris has an overall 38-17 win-loss record in 2022, 12-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Busan Challenger
De Loore has never competed in this tournament before.
Yuta Shimizu
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-14 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-24 | 35-23 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-23 | 36-21 | 7-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-12 | 12-8 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 1-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-1 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 5-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 404, Yuta got to the qualifications after beating Jea Moon Lee 7-65 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Moon Lee (7-65 6-4). During the match Shimizu scored 83 points vs Moon Lee’s 71. The Japanese was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Shimizu made 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Yuta Shimizu lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Shimizu put 55% of his first serves in, winning 67% (26/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (17/32) on the 2nd serve. Yuta broke Moon Lee 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
Shimizu’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Antalya,M15 Kuala Lumpur,M15 Kuching and M15 Jakarta.
Yuta has a composed 41-17 win-loss record in 2022, 34-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | De Loore | Shimizu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 23 |
| Pts | 60-38 | 83-71 |
| Total Points | 98 | 154 |
| Winners | 21 | 26 |
| %Winners | 35% | 31% |
Both De Loore and Shimizu played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, De Loore and Shimizu have played the same amount of sets 2. However, De Loore played 7 games less than Shimizu. Joris scored 21 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Yuta made 26 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | De Loore | Shimizu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2 |
| 1st in | 26/47 | 39/71 |
| %1st in | 55% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 26/39 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 17/32 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 53% |
De Loore fired 6 aces . Shimizu bagged 2 aces . De Loore won 81% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Shimizu won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | De Loore | Shimizu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/14 |
| % Converted | 56% | 36% |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 43% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
The Belgian broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Joris lost his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Shimizu broke his opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. Yuta conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
| De Loore | |||
| Q1 Jae Kim |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 60-38 | 60-38 | |
| Total points | 98 | 98 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 26/47 | 26/47 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Shimizu | |||
| Q1 Moon Lee |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 83-71 | 83-71 | |
| Total points | 154 | 154 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 39/71 | 39/71 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 26/39 | 26/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/32 | 17/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 43% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWLWL
LWLWLWWWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- John MillmanMillman – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio GomezGomez – Yibing WuWu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Marc PolmansPolmans (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Makoto OchiOchi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – Shinji HazawaHazawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Christopher EubanksEubanks (1-0) – H2H and prediction
