Nicholas David Ionel and Salvatore Caruso will square off in the 2nd round of the St. Tropez Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 7:30 pm on CENTRAL TAG HEUER. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Salvatore Caruso who should win in 3 sets.
Salvatore Caruso -> 1.68
Nicholas David Ionel -> 2.13
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Nicholas David Ionel vs. Salvatore Caruso
There is no head to head record between Nicholas David Ionel and Salvatore Caruso since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Nicholas David Ionel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-26 | 0-0 | 34-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 74-34 | 0-2 | 74-31 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-38 | 7-7 | 43-30 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 66-33 | 17-9 | 48-20 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-33 | 14-4 | 33-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 263, David Ionel got to the 2nd round after beating Mathys Erhard 6-2 6-4, Mathias Bourgue 7-65 2-6 6-3 and Jack Sock 6-4 5-4 ret..
In the 1st round against Sock, the Romanian had a free pass after Sock retired on a 6-4 5-4 . scoreline.
David Ionel has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 64% of his matches (153-85). 13-5 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, David Ionel has a composed43-18 record in the last 5 years on hard.
Nicholas’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh,M15 Marrakech,M25 Pitesti and M15 Craiova.
The Romanian has an aggregate 56-26 win-loss record in 2022, 13-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the St. Tropez Challenger
The Romanian has never competed in this tournament before.
Salvatore Caruso
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-12 | 8-9 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-36 | 6-6 | 32-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-24 | 10-6 | 10-13 | 1-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-25 | 9-9 | 7-11 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-20 | 7-8 | 8-8 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 271, Caruso reached the 2nd round after beating Mathieu Scaglia 6-4 6-3, Steven Diez 6-3 6-2 and Frederico Ferreira Silva 6-2 6-75 7-63.
In the 1st round, The Italian defeated Ferreira Silva (6-2 6-75 7-63). During the match Caruso scored 108 points vs Ferreira Silva’s 98. The Italian was quite aggressive to blast 48 winners.
About the serving games, Caruso recorded 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Salvatore Caruso was quite efficient on serve to win 76% (48/63) of his 1st serve and 61% (27/44) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Salvatore broke Ferreira Silva 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Salvatore’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Bendigo Challenger.
Salvatore has a compiled 20-21 win-loss record in 2022, 9-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | David Ionel | Caruso |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 67 | 70 |
| Pts | 223-196 | 241-193 |
| Total Points | 419 | 434 |
| Winners | 88 | 99 |
| %Winners | 39% | 41% |
Both David Ionel and Caruso played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Nicholas David Ionel lost 1 set, while Salvatore Caruso surrendered 1 set. David Ionel has played 1 set more than Caruso (8 vs 7). However, it’s interesting to notice that David Ionel played 3 games less than Caruso. David Ionel scored 88 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian scored 99 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | David Ionel | Caruso |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
| 1st in | 118/190 | 139/227 |
| %1st in | 62% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 88/118 | 99/139 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 39/72 | 51/88 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 58% |
David Ionel scored 6 aces (2 per match). Caruso scored 9 aces (3 per match). David Ionel won 75% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Caruso won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | David Ionel | Caruso |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 12 |
| Converted | 10/27 | 12/23 |
| % Converted | 37% | 52% |
| Conceded | 11 | 13 |
| Saved | 5 | 9 |
| % Saved | 45% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 4 |
Nicholas broke his opponents 10 times with a 37% conversion rate. The Romanian surrendered his serve 6 times and he saved 45% of the break points that he conceded. Caruso broke his opponents 12 times with a 52% conversion rate. Salvatore conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.
| David Ionel | |||||
| Q1 Erhard | Q3 Bourgue | R1 Sock | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 7-65 2-6 6-3 | 6-4 5-4 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 30 | 19 | 67 | |
| pts | 61-45 | 100-99 | 62-52 | 223-196 | |
| Total points | 106 | 199 | 114 | 419 | |
| Winners | 23 | 35 | 30 | 88 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 35% | 48% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 27/44 | 56/98 | 35/48 | 118/190 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 57% | 73% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 35/56 | 30/35 | 88/118 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 63% | 86% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 21/42 | 8/13 | 39/72 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 50% | 62% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 2 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/12 | 2/8 | 10/27 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 33% | 25% | 37% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 9 | 1 | 11 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 4/9 | 1/1 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 44% | 100% | 48% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | |
| Caruso | |||||
| Q1 Scaglia | Q3 Diez | R1 Ferreira Silva | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-2 6-75 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 17 | 34 | 70 | |
| pts | 62-44 | 71-51 | 108-98 | 241-193 | |
| Total points | 106 | 122 | 206 | 434 | |
| Winners | 20 | 31 | 48 | 99 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 44% | 44% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 31/50 | 45/70 | 63/107 | 139/227 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 64% | 59% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 20/31 | 31/45 | 48/63 | 99/139 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 69% | 76% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/25 | 27/44 | 51/88 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 48% | 61% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 3 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 4/5 | 3/9 | 12/23 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 80% | 33% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 | 4 | 13 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3/4 | 3/4 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 75% | 75% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in St. Tropez Challenger
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Adrian AndreevAndreev (6-4 6-76 6-4) – See score progression
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (6-2 6-75 7-63) – See score progression
- Mattia BellucciBellucci – Louis WesselsWessels (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Federico GaioGaio (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (7-69 6-3) – See score progression
- Fernando VerdascoVerdasco – Dan AddedAdded (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Jack SockSock (6-4 5-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Jesper De JongDe Jong (5-7 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Nick HardtHardt – Jurgen BriandBriand (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Clement TaburTabur (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Miljan ZekicZekic (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Lukas RosolRosol – Alexander RitschardRitschard (6-4 7-66) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Laurent LokoliLokoli (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-1 7-68) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas RosolRosol – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Fernando VerdascoVerdasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Salvatore CarusoCaruso (0-0) – H2H and prediction