Kacper Zuk and Gabriel Decamps will play each other in the 2nd round of the Ismaning Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:00 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kacper Zuk who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kacper Zuk is the pick to win this match.
Kacper Zuk -> 1.64
Gabriel Decamps -> 2.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kacper Zuk vs. Gabriel Decamps
There is no head to head record between Kacper Zuk and Gabriel Decamps since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Kacper Zuk
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 26-29 | 7-9 | 5-8 | 6-11 | 0-0 | 8-1 |
| 2022 | 35-27 | 12-7 | 6-9 | 12-9 | 0-1 | 5-1 |
| 2021 | 41-25 | 5-5 | 17-8 | 15-8 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
| 2020 | 31-9 | 6-2 | 10-4 | 15-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 269, Zuk reached the 2nd round after beating David Fix 6-1 6-3, Stuart Parker 6-4 7-5 and Antoine Escoffier 6-4 3-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Pole defeated Escoffier (6-4 3-6 6-4). During the match, Zuk scored 83 points vs Escoffier’s 78. The Pole was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zuk scored 8 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Overall, Kacper Zuk was extremely efficient on serve to win 77% (33/43) of his 1st serve and 67% (22/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Zuk broke Escoffier twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Zuk has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 62% of his matches (189-118). 3-0 on carpet in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Zuk has a composed6-5 match record in the last 7 years on carpet.
Kacper’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Biel Challenger,M25 Tbilisi and M25 Falun.
The Pole has an overall 26-23 win-loss record in 2022, 3-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ismaning Challenger
Gabriel Decamps
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-11 | 14-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 20-19 | 16-11 | 0-2 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-31 | 23-15 | 8-9 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 46-12 | 24-6 | 20-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 276, Decamps reached the 2nd round after defeating Matthias Bachinger 6-0 1-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Gabriel defeated Bachinger (6-0 1-6 6-4). During the match Decamps scored 104 points vs Bachinger’s 99. Decamps was pretty aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Decamps managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Gabriel Decamps lost the serve 3 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Decamps put 68% of his first serves in, winning 58% (39/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (16/31) on the 2nd serve. Gabriel broke Bachinger 5 times after converting 33% of his break points (5/15).
The Brazilian’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Vilnius,M25 Vale do Lobo and the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger.
Gabriel has a compiled 34-25 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ismaning Challenger
Decamps has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zuk | Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 67 | 23 |
| Pts | 219-176 | 104-99 |
| Total Points | 395 | 203 |
| Winners | 85 | 39 |
| %Winners | 39% | 38% |
Zuk played 3 matches while Decamps competed in 1 match. Zuk started his run from the qualifications while Decamps had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Kacper Zuk conceded 1 set, while Gabriel Decamps lost 1 set. Zuk has played 4 sets more than Decamps (7 vs 3). Therefore, Zuk played 44 games more than Decamps. Kacper scored 85 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Brazilian struck 39 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zuk | Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 30 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 5 |
| 1st in | 106/179 | 67/98 |
| %1st in | 59% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 85/106 | 39/67 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 58% |
| 2nd pts | 49/73 | 16/31 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 52% |
Zuk fired 30 aces (10 per match). Decamps struck 5 aces . Zuk won 80% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Decamps won 58% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zuk | Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 5 |
| Converted | 8/17 | 5/15 |
| % Converted | 47% | 33% |
| Conceded | 5 | 12 |
| Saved | 4 | 9 |
| % Saved | 80% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Zuk broke his opponents 8 times with a 47% conversion rate. The Pole surrendered his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Gabriel broke his opponent 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. Gabriel conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Zuk | |||||
| Q1 Fix |
Q3 Parker |
R1 Escoffier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 6-4 7-5 | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 22 | 29 | 67 | |
| pts | 64-35 | 72-63 | 83-78 | 219-176 | |
| Total points | 99 | 135 | 161 | 395 | |
| Winners | 24 | 28 | 33 | 85 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 39% | 40% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 14 | 8 | 30 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 27/38 | 36/65 | 43/76 | 106/179 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 55% | 57% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 24/27 | 28/36 | 33/43 | 85/106 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 78% | 77% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/11 | 19/29 | 22/33 | 49/73 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 66% | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 2/4 | 2/5 | 8/17 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | 40% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/3 | 1/2 | 4 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Decamps | |||||
| R1 Bachinger |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 1-6 6-4 | ||||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |||
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |||
| pts | 104-99 | 104-99 | |||
| Total points | 203 | 203 | |||
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |||
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |||
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |||
| 1st in | 67/98 | 67/98 | |||
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |||
| 1st pts | 39/67 | 39/67 | |||
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |||
| 2nd pts | 16/31 | 16/31 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |||
| Converted | 5/15 | 5/15 | |||
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |||
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |||
| Saved | 9/12 | 9 | |||
| Saved % | 75% | 25% | |||
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |||
Head 2 Head
LWLLWL
LLWWLWLWLW Tennis Scores in Ismaning Challenger
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-1 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alastair GrayGray – Nerman FaticFatic (7-63 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Daniel MasurMasur (6-1 6-73 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Robin HaaseHaase – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Kacper ZukZuk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
