![Prediction And Head To Head Maximilian Marterer Vs. Kimmer Coppejans Hzzimgiv6x Prediction and head to head Maximilian Marterer vs. Kimmer Coppejans](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Maximilian-Marterer-vs.-Kimmer-Coppejans-hzzimgIv6x.jpg)
Maximilian Marterer and Kimmer Coppejans will play each other in the 2nd round of the Seoul Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Maximilian Marterer who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Maximilian Marterer is the pick to win this match.
Maximilian Marterer -> 1.5
Kimmer Coppejans -> 2.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Maximilian Marterer vs. Kimmer Coppejans
This will be the 3rd time that Maximilian Marterer and Kimmer Coppejans fight against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Marterer and Coppejans (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Marterer won 6-3 6-1 in the 1st round in the Banja Luka Challenger back in 2017.
Maximilian Marterer
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 10-19 | 3-5 | 5-8 | 0-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 46-27 | 12-10 | 13-10 | 12-4 | 5-2 | 4-1 |
2022 | 39-28 | 11-7 | 17-15 | 7-5 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 29-28 | 4-2 | 15-16 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 3-2 |
2020 | 19-14 | 0-2 | 9-6 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
Ranked no. 162, Maximilian reached the 2nd round after defeating Chun Hsin Tseng 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The German had a good straight sets win against Hsin Tseng (6-3 6-2). During the match, Marterer scored 69 points vs Hsin Tseng’s 49. The German was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Marterer made 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Maximilian Marterer was extremely effective on serve to win 87% (27/31) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Maximilian broke Hsin Tseng 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Marterer has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (322-213). 10-5 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Marterer has a compiled 67-42 match record in the last years on hard.
Marterer’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Braunschweig Challenger.
The German has a composed 35-24 win-loss record in 2022, 10-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
The German has never competed in this tournament before.
Kimmer Coppejans
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-30 | 4-5 | 24-19 | 0-5 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 36-28 | 6-8 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-27 | 4-5 | 17-18 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
2020 | 14-17 | 6-5 | 5-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 203, Kimmer reached the 2nd round after defeating Tung-Lin Wu 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Coppejans had a good straight sets win against Wu (6-3 6-4). During the match Coppejans scored 67 points vs Wu’s 53. The Belgian was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Coppejans bagged 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Kimmer Coppejans was extremely efficient on serve to win 82% (27/33) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kimmer broke Wu 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
The Belgian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Oeiras 3 Challenger and the Toulouse Challenger.
Kimmer has an overall 35-24 win-loss record in 2022, 5-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Marterer | Coppejans |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 17 | 19 |
Pts | 69-49 | 67-53 |
Total Points | 118 | 120 |
Winners | 27 | 27 |
%Winners | 39% | 40% |
Both Marterer and Coppejans played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Marterer and Coppejans have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Marterer played 2 games less than Coppejans. The German scored 27 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Coppejans bagged 27 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Marterer | Coppejans |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 5 |
Avg per match | 4 | 5 |
1st in | 31/45 | 33/50 |
%1st in | 69% | 66% |
1st pts | 27/31 | 27/33 |
%1st pts | 87% | 82% |
2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/17 |
%2nd pts | 64% | 53% |
Marterer scored 4 aces . Coppejans bagged 5 aces . Marterer won 87% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Coppejans won 82% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Marterer | Coppejans |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 3 |
Converted | 3/10 | 3/12 |
% Converted | 30% | 25% |
Conceded | 0 | 1 |
Saved | 0 | 0 |
% Saved | 0% | 0% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The German broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Marterer quite strong on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Coppejans broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Coppejans conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Marterer | |||
R1 Hsin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 69-49 | 69-49 | |
Total points | 118 | 118 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 31/45 | 31/45 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
1st pts | 27/31 | 27/31 | |
% 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
% 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Coppejans | |||
R1 Wu |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 67-53 | 67-53 | |
Total points | 120 | 120 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 33/50 | 33/50 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 27/33 | 27/33 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Seoul Challenger
- Li TuTu – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yibing WuWu – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Steve JohnsonJohnson (6-2 3-6 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- John MillmanMillman – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Hong ChungChung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Maximilian MartererMarterer (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yibing WuWu – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction