Christian Langmo and Sam Riffice will square off in the 2nd round of the Fairfield Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on CAMMISA COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sam Riffice who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sam Riffice is the pick to win this match.
Sam Riffice -> 1.41
Christian Langmo -> 2.82
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christian Langmo vs. Sam Riffice
There is no head to head record between Christian Langmo and Sam Riffice since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Christian Langmo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-18 | 18-13 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 413 (career-high), Christian got to the 2nd round after beating Govind Nanda 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Christian had a good straight sets win against Nanda (6-4 6-4). During the match, Langmo scored 63 points vs Nanda’s 56. Langmo was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Langmo fired 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Christian Langmo lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Langmo put 63% of his first serves in, winning 68% (27/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (9/23) on the 2nd serve. Langmo broke Nanda 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Langmo has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 60% of his matches (144-98). 15-14 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Langmo has a composed121-77 record in the last 6 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Bolzano.
The American has an overall 24-22 win-loss record in 2022, 15-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Sam Riffice
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 20-10 | 18-8 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-5 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 14-7 | 13-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2018 | 28-18 | 20-11 | 7-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 650, Riffice reached the 2nd round after defeating Jack Pinnington Jones 6-3 6-4, Ezekiel Clark 5-7 7-5 6-3 and Stefan Kozlov 3-6 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round against Kozlov, Riffice recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 6-3). During the match Riffice scored 89 points vs Kozlov’s 80. Sam was very aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Riffice made 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Sam Riffice lost the serve twice and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Riffice put 60% of his first serves in, winning 67% (40/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (21/40) on the 2nd serve. Riffice broke Kozlov 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Riffice’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Fayetteville.
Sam has a compiled 18-9 win-loss record in 2022, 16-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Langmo | Riffice |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 78 |
| Pts | 63-56 | 272-250 |
| Total Points | 119 | 522 |
| Winners | 27 | 108 |
| %Winners | 43% | 40% |
Langmo played 1 match while Riffice competed in 3 matches. Riffice started his run from the qualifications while Langmo had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Sam Riffice conceded 2 sets while Christian Langmo hasn’t lost a set so far. Langmo has played 6 set(s) less than Riffice (2 vs 8). Therefore, Langmo played 58 games less than Riffice. Langmo scored 27 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 108 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Langmo | Riffice |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 26 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 8.7 |
| 1st in | 40/63 | 156/292 |
| %1st in | 63% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 27/40 | 108/156 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 9/23 | 68/136 |
| %2nd pts | 39% | 50% |
Langmo blasted 6 aces . Riffice made 26 aces (8.7 per match). Langmo won 68% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Riffice won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Langmo | Riffice |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 13 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 13/21 |
| % Converted | 83% | 62% |
| Conceded | 9 | 41 |
| Saved | 6 | 34 |
| % Saved | 67% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 7 |
Langmo broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Christian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 13 times with a 62% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Langmo | |||
| R1 Nanda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 63-56 | 63-56 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 40/63 | 40/63 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 27/40 | 27/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/23 | 9/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Riffice | |||||
| Q1 Pinnington |
Q3 Clark |
R1 Kozlov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 5-7 7-5 6-3 | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 33 | 26 | 78 | |
| pts | 67-58 | 116-112 | 89-80 | 272-250 | |
| Total points | 125 | 228 | 169 | 522 | |
| Winners | 26 | 42 | 40 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 36% | 45% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 15 | 7 | 26 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 35/73 | 61/119 | 60/100 | 156/292 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 51% | 60% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 26/35 | 42/61 | 40/60 | 108/156 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 69% | 67% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/38 | 29/58 | 21/40 | 68/136 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 50% | 53% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 4 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 13/21 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 56% | 57% | 62% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 17 | 13 | 41 | |
| Saved | 9/11 | 14/17 | 11/13 | 34 | |
| Saved % | 82% | 82% | 85% | 249% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWWWL
Tennis Scores in Fairfield Challenger
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (2-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-65 6-74 7-61) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Malek JaziriJaziri (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexander CozbinovCozbinov – Nicolas MejiaMejia (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Leandro RiediRiedi (2-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Ben SheltonShelton – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (7-62 7-65) – See score progression
- Sam RifficeRiffice – Stefan KozlovKozlov (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (3-6 6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Charles BroomBroom (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Evan ZhuZhu – Benjamin LockLock (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Paul JubbJubb (6-2 0-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Govind NandaNanda (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (3-6 6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Ben SheltonShelton – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Leandro RiediRiedi (2-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Malek JaziriJaziri (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexander CozbinovCozbinov – Nicolas MejiaMejia (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-6(5) 6-7(4) 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Sam RifficeRiffice – Stefan KozlovKozlov (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Giovanni OradiniOradini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander CozbinovCozbinov – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Sam RifficeRiffice (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Evan ZhuZhu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
