Yibing Wu and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe will play each other in the 2nd round of the Seoul Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yibing Wu who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Yibing Wu is the pick to win this match.
Yibing Wu -> 1.3
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe -> 3.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Yibing Wu vs. Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
There is no head to head record between Yibing Wu and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Yibing Wu
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-5 | 7-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-17 | 5-7 | 3-5 | 9-1 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-7 | 20-5 | 10-2 | 10-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 135, Wu reached the 2nd round after defeating Radu Albot 6-0 4-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Wu defeated Albot (6-0 4-6 6-2). During the match, Wu scored 88 points vs Albot’s 72. Wu was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wu made 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Yibing Wu lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Wu put 49% of his first serves in, winning 65% (28/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (28/45) on the 2nd serve. Yibing broke Albot 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Wu has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 65% of his matches (90-48). 17-4 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Wu has an overall54-35 record in the last 5 years on hard.
Wu’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Orange Park,the Orlando Challenger,the Rome Challenger and the Indianapolis Challenger.
The Chinese has an aggregate 37-6 win-loss record in 2022, 17-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
Wu has never competed in this tournament before.
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-25 | 2-6 | 10-13 | 15-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 14-20 | 4-7 | 9-9 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-11 | 5-4 | 4-4 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2019 | 18-18 | 1-3 | 6-8 | 11-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 200, Cedrik-Marcel got to the 2nd round after beating Aleksandar Vukic 7-5 6-76 6-4.
In the 1st round, Cedrik-Marcel defeated Vukic (7-5 6-76 6-4). During the match Stebe scored 125 points vs Vukic’s 123. Stebe was exceptionally aggressive to blast 46 winners.
About the serving games, Stebe scored 8 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Cedrik-Marcel Stebe lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Stebe put 58% of his first serves in, winning 67% (46/69) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (29/51) on the 2nd serve. Stebe broke Vukic 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Stebe’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Como Challenger.
The German has an overall 28-24 win-loss record in 2022, 2-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wu | Stebe |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 24 | 35 |
| Pts | 88-72 | 125-123 |
| Total Points | 160 | 248 |
| Winners | 28 | 46 |
| %Winners | 32% | 37% |
Both Wu and Stebe played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Yibing Wu surrendered 1 set, while Cedrik-Marcel Stebe dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Wu and Stebe have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Wu played 11 games less than Stebe. Yibing scored 28 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Stebe bagged 46 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wu | Stebe |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 8 |
| 1st in | 43/88 | 69/120 |
| %1st in | 49% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 28/43 | 46/69 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 28/45 | 29/51 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 57% |
Wu fired 5 aces . Stebe bagged 8 aces . Wu won 65% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Stebe won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wu | Stebe |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 63% | 40% |
| Conceded | 6 | 10 |
| Saved | 5 | 8 |
| % Saved | 83% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Chinese broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Wu surrendered his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Cedrik-Marcel broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Wu | |||
| R1 Albot |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 4-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 88-72 | 88-72 | |
| Total points | 160 | 160 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 43/88 | 43/88 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 28/43 | 28/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 28/45 | 28/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Stebe | |||
| R1 Vukic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-76 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 125-123 | 125-123 | |
| Total points | 248 | 248 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 69/120 | 69/120 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 46/69 | 46/69 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 29/51 | 29/51 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWLL
Tennis Scores in Seoul Challenger
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Emilio GomezGomez (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Aleksandar VukicVukic (7-5 6-76 6-4) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (7-66 6-3) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Jangjun KimKim (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Yibing WuWu – Radu AlbotAlbot (6-0 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Ryan PenistonPeniston (5-7 6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Marc PolmansPolmans (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Christopher EubanksEubanks (6-76 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- John MillmanMillman – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Hong ChungChung – Zsombor PirosPiros (4-6 6-3 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (3-6 7-5 7-66) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Emilio GomezGomez (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Marc PolmansPolmans (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (7-6(6) 6-3) – See score progression
- Hong ChungChung – Zsombor PirosPiros (4-6 6-3 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- John MillmanMillman – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Hong ChungChung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Maximilian MartererMarterer (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Rinky HijikataHijikata (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yibing WuWu – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
