Martin Damm and August Holmgren will face off in the qualifications of the Fairfield Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on KENNEDY-GROSSMAN. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is August Holmgren who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, August Holmgren is the pick to win this match.
August Holmgren -> 1.6
Martin Damm -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Martin Damm vs. August Holmgren
There is no head to head record between Martin Damm and August Holmgren since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Martin Damm
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-13 | 6-4 | 1-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-29 | 30-14 | 9-8 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-23 | 17-12 | 10-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-22 | 7-4 | 16-12 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-11 | 3-6 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 505, Damm got to the qualifications after defeating Simon Carr 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Martin had a good straight sets win against Carr (6-3 6-4). During the match, Damm and Carr scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 505 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The American was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Talking about the service games, Damm wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the match and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults. Martin Damm conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Damm has a winning record in the last 4 years having won 52% of his matches (63-57). 12-11 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Damm has a composed22-21 record in the last 4 years on hard.
Martin’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Jablonec nad Nisou and M25 Santo Domingo.
Damm has an aggregate 26-20 win-loss record in 2022, 12-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Fairfield Challenger
Damm has never competed in this tournament before.
August Holmgren
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-15 | 9-8 | 6-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-26 | 33-14 | 9-6 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-12 | 18-4 | 10-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-8 | 12-6 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 544 (career-high), Holmgren reached the qualifications after beating Omni Kumar 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, August had a good straight sets win against Kumar (6-2 6-3). During the match Holmgren scored 63 points vs Kumar’s 41. August was very aggressive to blast 12 winners.
Talking about serving, Holmgren scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, August Holmgren was quite effective on serve to win 71% (12/17) of his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Dane broke Kumar 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
The Dane’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Rancho Santa Fe and M15 San Diego.
Holmgren has an aggregate 26-8 win-loss record in 2022, 16-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Damm | Holmgren |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 17 |
| Pts | 0-0 | 63-41 |
| Total Points | 0 | 104 |
| Winners | 0 | 12 |
| %Winners | 0% | 19% |
Both Damm and Holmgren played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Damm and Holmgren have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Damm played 2 games more than Holmgren. The American scored 0 winners (0% of the total points). On the other side, Holmgren fired 12 winners (19%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Damm | Holmgren |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 1 |
| 1st in | 0/0 | 17/44 |
| %1st in | 0% | 39% |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | 12/17 |
| %1st pts | 0% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | 16/27 |
| %2nd pts | 0% | 59% |
Damm didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Holmgren fired 1 ace . Damm won 0% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 0% of the points. On the other side, Holmgren won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Damm | Holmgren |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 6 |
| Converted | 0/0 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 0% | 67% |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Martin hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. The American very solid his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point. August broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Holmgren conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Damm | |||
| Q1 Carr |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | 0% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | 0% | % | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
| Holmgren | |||
| Q1 Kumar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 63-41 | 63-41 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 12 | 12 | |
| %Winners | 19% | 19% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 17/44 | 17/44 | |
| % 1st in | 39% | 39% | |
| 1st pts | 12/17 | 12/17 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 16/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLLWWL
LWLWWWWLLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Malek JaziriJaziri – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gage BrymerBrymer – Alfredo PerezPerez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Benjamin LockLock (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ezekiel ClarkClark – Sam RifficeRiffice (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Alafia AyeniAyeni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
