Hamad Medjedovic and Maximilian Neuchrist will square off in the qualifications of the Seoul Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:30 am on COURT 13. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hamad Medjedovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hamad Medjedovic is the pick to win this match.
Hamad Medjedovic -> 1.68
Maximilian Neuchrist -> 2.08
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hamad Medjedovic vs. Maximilian Neuchrist
There is no head to head record between Hamad Medjedovic and Maximilian Neuchrist since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Hamad Medjedovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-9 | 1-3 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-23 | 10-5 | 22-9 | 11-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 12-10 | 28-6 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 252 (career-high), the Serbian reached the qualifications after beating Ryota Tanuma 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Serbian had a good straight sets win against Tanuma (6-4 6-3). During the match, Medjedovic scored 68 points vs Tanuma’s 53. Medjedovic was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Medjedovic made 16 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults. Hamad Medjedovic was exceptionally effective on serve to win 81% (26/32) of his 1st serve and 66% (19/29) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Serbian broke Tanuma twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Medjedovic has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 63% of his matches (59-35). 11-8 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Medjedovic has a compiled13-10 record in the last 4 years on hard.
The Serbian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Antalya,M25 Ulcinj and the Luedenscheid Challenger.
Medjedovic has a compiled 43-19 win-loss record in 2022, 11-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
Hamad has never competed in this tournament before.
Maximilian Neuchrist
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-32 | 6-11 | 8-11 | 11-8 | 0-1 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 44-25 | 15-8 | 26-11 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-18 | 27-10 | 1-4 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-8 | 10-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 341, the Austrian reached the qualifications after beating Makoto Ochi 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Austrian had a good straight sets win against Ochi (7-5 6-4). During the match Neuchrist scored 77 points vs Ochi’s 61. Neuchrist was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Neuchrist fired 12 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Maximilian Neuchrist was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 83% (34/41) of his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Maximilian broke Ochi twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Neuchrist’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Most and M25 Sierre.
Maximilian has a compiled 32-20 win-loss record in 2022, 11-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Medjedovic | Neuchrist |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 22 |
| Pts | 68-53 | 77-61 |
| Total Points | 121 | 138 |
| Winners | 26 | 34 |
| %Winners | 38% | 44% |
Both Medjedovic and Neuchrist played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Medjedovic and Neuchrist have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Medjedovic played 3 games less than Neuchrist. Hamad scored 26 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Maximilian blasted 34 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Medjedovic | Neuchrist |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 16 | 12 |
| 1st in | 32/61 | 41/65 |
| %1st in | 52% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 34/41 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 19/29 | 15/24 |
| %2nd pts | 66% | 63% |
Medjedovic recorded 16 aces . Neuchrist blasted 12 aces . Medjedovic won 81% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 66% of the points. On the other side, Neuchrist won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Medjedovic | Neuchrist |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 2 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/7 |
| % Converted | 50% | 29% |
| Conceded | 1 | 3 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Hamad broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. The Serbian quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 1 break points. Maximilian broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. Neuchrist was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Medjedovic | |||
| Q1 Tanuma |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 68-53 | 68-53 | |
| Total points | 121 | 121 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 16 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 32/61 | 32/61 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 26/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/29 | 19/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 66% | 66% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Neuchrist | |||
| Q1 Ochi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 77-61 | 77-61 | |
| Total points | 138 | 138 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 41/65 | 41/65 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 34/41 | 34/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/24 | 15/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWLW
L
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Cheong-Eui KimKim – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Yibing WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hong ChungChung – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Ryan PenistonPeniston (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Joris De LooreDe Loore (0-0) – H2H and prediction
