Aleksandar Kovacevic and Joris De Loore will square off in the qualifications of the Seoul Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:30 am on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Aleksandar Kovacevic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Aleksandar Kovacevic is the pick to win this match.
Aleksandar Kovacevic -> 1.533
Joris De Loore -> 2.36
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Aleksandar Kovacevic vs. Joris De Loore
There is no head to head record between Aleksandar Kovacevic and Joris De Loore since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Aleksandar Kovacevic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-19 | 14-7 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-27 | 34-15 | 0-5 | 7-2 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-31 | 22-18 | 4-4 | 15-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-17 | 11-10 | 2-3 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 167 (career-high), Kovacevic reached the qualifications after defeating Woobin Shin 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications, Kovacevic had a good straight sets win against Shin (6-0 6-1). During the match, Kovacevic scored 63 points vs Shin’s 34. Aleksandar was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kovacevic blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Aleksandar Kovacevic was quite effective on serve to win 83% (19/23) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Shin 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Kovacevic has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 55% of his matches (101-81). 20-15 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Kovacevic has a compiled61-50 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
Aleksandar’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Indianapolis Challenger.
Aleksandar has an aggregate 33-25 win-loss record in 2022, 20-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seoul Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Joris De Loore
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-17 | 1-2 | 4-8 | 5-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-25 | 5-3 | 10-8 | 27-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-18 | 14-4 | 22-10 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-8 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 10-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 313, the Belgian reached the qualifications after defeating Juan Kim 6-0 6-0.
In the qualifications, De Loore had a good straight sets win against Kim (6-0 6-0). During the match De Loore scored 48 points vs Kim’s 7. De Loore was exceptionally aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, De Loore blasted 4 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Joris De Loore conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 78% of his first serves in, win 100% (21/21) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (3/6) on the 2nd serve. Joris broke Kim 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
De Loore’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Kiseljak and Bigorre.
Joris has a composed 37-16 win-loss record in 2022, 11-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kovacevic | De Loore |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 12 |
| Pts | 63-34 | 48-7 |
| Total Points | 97 | 55 |
| Winners | 19 | 21 |
| %Winners | 30% | 44% |
Both Kovacevic and De Loore played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Kovacevic and De Loore have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Kovacevic played 1 game more than De Loore. Kovacevic scored 19 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, The Belgian struck 21 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kovacevic | De Loore |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 23/39 | 21/27 |
| %1st in | 59% | 78% |
| 1st pts | 19/23 | 21/21 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 100% |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 3/6 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 50% |
Kovacevic scored 3 aces . De Loore bagged 4 aces . Kovacevic won 83% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, De Loore won 100% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kovacevic | De Loore |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 45% | 67% |
| Conceded | 3 | 0 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Kovacevic broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Kovacevic quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 3 break points. Joris broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Belgian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Kovacevic | |||
| Q1 Shin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 63-34 | 63-34 | |
| Total points | 97 | 97 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 23/39 | 23/39 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 19/23 | 19/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 10/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| De Loore | |||
| Q1 Kim |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
| pts | 48-7 | 48-7 | |
| Total points | 55 | 55 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 21/27 | 21/27 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 21/21 | 21/21 | |
| % 1st pts | 100% | 100% | |
| 2nd pts | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLWWLLL
LLWLWLWLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Cheong-Eui KimKim – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Yibing WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hong ChungChung – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Ryan PenistonPeniston (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Joris De LooreDe Loore (0-0) – H2H and prediction
