Hugo Gaston and Vasek Pospisil will square off in the semifinal of the Mouilleron for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 5:00 pm on CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Vasek Pospisil who should win in 3 sets.
Vasek Pospisil -> 1.72
Hugo Gaston -> 2.07
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Hugo Gaston vs. Vasek Pospisil
There is no head to head record between Hugo Gaston and Vasek Pospisil since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Hugo Gaston
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-31 | 9-12 | 6-14 | 15-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-31 | 5-12 | 15-11 | 8-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-32 | 6-5 | 30-18 | 8-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-31 | 4-9 | 4-8 | 16-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 44-30 | 2-3 | 32-16 | 10-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 79, the French player got to the semifinal after beating Henri Laaksonen 7-66 4-6 7-67, Valentin Royer 7-65 6-4 and Norbert Gombos 6-4 6-4.
In the quarter, The French player had a good straight sets win against Gombos (6-4 6-4). During the match, Gaston scored 65 points vs Gombos’s 57. The French player was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gaston struck 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Hugo Gaston was extremely efficient on serve to win 80% (24/30) of his 1st serve and 57% (17/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Gaston broke Gombos 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Hugo has lost 1 set in this event to win 51% of the points he played.
Gaston has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (160-116). 11-7 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Gaston has an aggregate42-40 match record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
The French player best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Rennes Challenger and the Orleans Challenger.
The French player has an aggregate 22-27 win-loss record in 2022, 11-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Le
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Vasek Pospisil
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 8-13 | 5-9 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 9-14 | 2-9 | 0-0 | 7-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-22 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 35-10 | 1-2 | 3-1 |
| 2021 | 8-19 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 1-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 136, the Canadian got to the semifinal after defeating Hugo Grenier 7-63 6-4, Jules Marie 6-3 6-3 and Jeff Wolf 4-6 6-3 7-63.
In the quarter against Wolf, Pospisil recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 7-63). During the match Pospisil scored 100 points vs Wolf’s 92. Pospisil was very aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Pospisil bagged 16 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Vasek Pospisil was extremely efficient on serve to win 74% (40/54) of his 1st serve and 51% (18/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 4 times. Pospisil broke Wolf 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Pospisil has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Vasek’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Quimper Challenger and the Pau Challenger.
The Canadian has an overall 34-18 win-loss record in 2022, 27-8 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Le
Vasek has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gaston | Pospisil |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 79 | 73 |
| Pts | 251-242 | 239-201 |
| Total Points | 493 | 440 |
| Winners | 108 | 99 |
| %Winners | 43% | 41% |
Both Gaston and Pospisil played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Hugo Gaston dropped 1 set, while Vasek Pospisil dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Gaston and Pospisil have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Gaston played 6 games more than Pospisil. The French player scored 108 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Canadian blasted 99 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gaston | Pospisil |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 23 | 32 |
| Avg per match | 7.7 | 10.7 |
| 1st in | 144/247 | 121/203 |
| %1st in | 58% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 108/144 | 99/121 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 58/103 | 46/82 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 56% |
Gaston made 23 aces (7.7 per match). Pospisil fired 32 aces (10.7 per match). Gaston won 75% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Pospisil won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gaston | Pospisil |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 8 |
| Converted | 7/15 | 8/17 |
| % Converted | 47% | 47% |
| Conceded | 15 | 9 |
| Saved | 10 | 5 |
| % Saved | 67% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
Gaston broke his opponents 7 times with a 47% conversion rate. Gaston dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Pospisil broke his opponents 8 times with a 47% conversion rate. Vasek conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gaston | |||||
| R1 Laaksonen | R2 Royer | 1/4 Gombos | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 4-6 7-67 | 7-65 6-4 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 36 | 23 | 20 | 79 | |
| pts | 115-117 | 71-68 | 65-57 | 251-242 | |
| Total points | 232 | 139 | 122 | 493 | |
| Winners | 47 | 37 | 24 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 52% | 37% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 10 | 5 | 8 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 69/111 | 45/76 | 30/60 | 144/247 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 59% | 50% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 47/69 | 37/45 | 24/30 | 108/144 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 82% | 80% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/42 | 16/31 | 17/30 | 58/103 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 52% | 57% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 1/1 | 3/5 | 7/15 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 100% | 60% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 3 | 3 | 15 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 3/3 | 2/3 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 100% | 67% | 74% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | |
| Pospisil | |||||
| R1 Grenier | R2 Marie | 1/4 Wolf | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-4 | 6-3 6-3 | 4-6 6-3 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 18 | 32 | 73 | |
| pts | 76-62 | 63-47 | 100-92 | 239-201 | |
| Total points | 138 | 110 | 192 | 440 | |
| Winners | 33 | 26 | 40 | 99 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 41% | 40% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 7 | 16 | 32 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 35/60 | 32/54 | 54/89 | 121/203 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 59% | 61% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 33/35 | 26/32 | 40/54 | 99/121 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 81% | 74% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 13/22 | 18/35 | 46/82 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 59% | 51% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 1/3 | 3/3 | 4/11 | 8/17 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 100% | 36% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/3 | 2/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 33% | 44% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Le
- Sander Arends/David PelArends/David Pel – Viktor Durasovic/Patrik Niklas-SalminenDurasovic/Patrik Niklas-Salminen (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jelle SelsSels – Jurgen BriandBriand (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction