Emilio Gomez and Ji Sung Nam will face off in the quarter of the Gwangju Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Gomez who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Gomez is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Gomez -> 1.31
Ji Sung Nam -> 3.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Gomez vs. Ji Sung Nam
There is no head to head record between Emilio Gomez and Ji Sung Nam since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Emilio Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-28 | 8-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-26 | 38-15 | 1-3 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-33 | 25-15 | 9-11 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 102 (career-high), Emilio reached the quarter after beating Ben Patael 7-67 6-2 and Mukund Sasikumar 6-4 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Gomez had a good straight sets win against Kumar Mukund (6-4 6-2). During the match, Gomez scored 68 points vs Kumar Mukund’s 51. Emilio was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gomez fired 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Emilio Gomez conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 68% of his first serves in, win 88% (30/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (7/16) on the 2nd serve. Gomez broke Kumar Mukund 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gomez hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Gomez has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (348-244). 33-12 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gomez has an aggregate 175-99 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
The Ecuadorian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Salinas Challenger,the Malaga Challenger,the Winnipeg Challenger,the Lexington Challenger and the Columbus 2 Challenger.
Emilio has an overall 41-21 win-loss record in 2022, 33-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Gwangju Challenger
The Ecuadorian has never competed in this tournament before.
Ji Sung Nam
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-7 | 5-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 15-20 | 13-15 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-19 | 24-13 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-7 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 590, Ji got to the quarter after beating Hoyoung Roh 6-2 6-1, Shinji Hazawa 6-1 7-63, Yunseong Chung 1-6 6-3 7-5 and Yibing Wu 6-4 6-2.
In the 2nd round, The Korean had a good straight sets win against Wu (6-4 6-2). During the match Sung Nam scored 62 points vs Wu’s 49. Ji was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Sung Nam scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Ji Sung Nam was pretty efficient on serve to win 73% (22/30) of his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Ji broke Wu 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Sung Nam started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Sung Nam’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Chiang Rai.
The Korean has an overall 24-14 win-loss record in 2022, 22-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gomez | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 39 | 81 |
| Pts | 142-111 | 281-230 |
| Total Points | 253 | 511 |
| Winners | 61 | 122 |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% |
Gomez played 2 matches while Sung Nam competed in 4 matches. Sung Nam started his run from the qualifications while Gomez had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Ji Sung Nam dropped 1 set while Emilio Gomez hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Gomez has played 5 set(s) less than Sung Nam (4 vs 9). Therefore, Gomez played 42 games less than Sung Nam. Emilio scored 61 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Korean fired 122 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gomez | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 2 |
| 1st in | 78/118 | 171/273 |
| %1st in | 66% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 61/78 | 122/171 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 20/40 | 51/102 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 50% |
Gomez fired 6 aces (3 per match). Sung Nam managed to score 8 aces (2 per match). Gomez won 78% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Sung Nam won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gomez | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 17 |
| Converted | 7/12 | 17/28 |
| % Converted | 58% | 61% |
| Conceded | 4 | 25 |
| Saved | 2 | 18 |
| % Saved | 50% | 72% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 7 |
Emilio broke his opponents 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. The Ecuadorian dropped his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Sung Nam broke his opponents 17 times with a 61% conversion rate. Sung Nam conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 72% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gomez | ||||
| R1 Fatael |
R2 Kumar Mukund |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-67 6-2 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 18 | 39 | |
| pts | 74-60 | 68-51 | 142-111 | |
| Total points | 134 | 119 | 253 | |
| Winners | 31 | 30 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 44% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 44/68 | 34/50 | 78/118 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 68% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 31/44 | 30/34 | 61/78 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 88% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 7/16 | 20/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 44% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 3/7 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 43% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 0/0 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Sung Nam | ||||||
| Q1 Roh |
Q3 Hazawa |
R1 Chung |
R2 Wu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-1 7-63 | 1-6 6-3 7-5 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 20 | 28 | 18 | 81 | |
| pts | 55-28 | 72-60 | 92-93 | 62-49 | 281-230 | |
| Total points | 83 | 132 | 185 | 111 | 511 | |
| Winners | 20 | 38 | 42 | 22 | 122 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 53% | 46% | 35% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 25/36 | 55/84 | 61/96 | 30/57 | 171/273 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 65% | 64% | 53% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 20/25 | 38/55 | 42/61 | 22/30 | 122/171 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 69% | 69% | 73% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 14/29 | 15/35 | 15/27 | 51/102 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 48% | 43% | 56% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 17 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 4/7 | 3/6 | 4/6 | 17/28 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 57% | 50% | 67% | 61% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 25 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 8/10 | 5/8 | 2/3 | 18 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 80% | 63% | 67% | 143% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLWLLW
WLWLLWWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Emilio GomezGomez – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction
