Zsombor Piros and Li Tu will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Gwangju Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on SHOW COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zsombor Piros who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zsombor Piros is the pick to win this match.
Zsombor Piros -> 1.45
Li Tu -> 2.67
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zsombor Piros vs. Li Tu
There is no head to head record between Zsombor Piros and Li Tu since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Zsombor Piros
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-17 | 1-4 | 10-11 | 7-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-29 | 3-2 | 35-18 | 5-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-23 | 7-6 | 19-9 | 10-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-16 | 3-2 | 31-9 | 13-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-2 | 1-1 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 160, the Hungarian got to the 2nd round after defeating Kimmer Coppejans 6-4 4-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Piros defeated Coppejans (6-4 4-6 6-2). During the match, Piros scored 91 points vs Coppejans’s 83. The Hungarian was extremely aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Piros scored 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Zsombor Piros lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Piros put 60% of his first serves in, winning 67% (39/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (21/39) on the 2nd serve. Piros broke Coppejans 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Piros has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 64% of his matches (180-102). 3-5 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Piros has an overall33-29 record in the last 7 years on hard.
Piros’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Split Challenger and the Tampere Challenger.
The Hungarian has an aggregate 34-20 win-loss record in 2022, 3-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Gwangju Challenger
The Hungarian has never competed in this tournament before.
Li Tu
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-15 | 14-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-32 | 29-19 | 0-3 | 3-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 50-25 | 34-16 | 15-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-7 | 28-4 | 0-0 | 13-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 298, the Australian reached the 2nd round after beating Tung-Lin Wu 6-72 7-69 6-1.
In the 1st round against Wu, Li recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-72 7-69 6-1). During the match Tu scored 114 points vs Wu’s 102. Tu was quite aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about serving, Tu bagged 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Li Tu lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Tu put 66% of his first serves in, winning 68% (48/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (21/37) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Wu 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
The Australian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Bendigo,M25 Cairo,M15 Monastir,M25 Monastir and M15 Waco.
The Australian has an aggregate 42-19 win-loss record in 2022, 26-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Piros | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 33 |
| Pts | 91-83 | 114-102 |
| Total Points | 174 | 216 |
| Winners | 39 | 48 |
| %Winners | 43% | 42% |
Both Piros and Tu played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Zsombor Piros surrendered 1 set, while Li Tu conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Piros and Tu have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Piros played 5 games less than Tu. The Hungarian scored 39 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian scored 48 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Piros | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 6 |
| 1st in | 58/97 | 71/108 |
| %1st in | 60% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 39/58 | 48/71 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 21/39 | 21/37 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 57% |
Piros fired 4 aces . Tu recorded 6 aces . Piros won 67% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Tu won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Piros | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 67% | 50% |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 |
| Saved | 4 | 2 |
| % Saved | 67% | 40% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The Hungarian broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Zsombor surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Tu conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded.
| Piros | |||
| R1 Coppejans |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 91-83 | 91-83 | |
| Total points | 174 | 174 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 58/97 | 58/97 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 39/58 | 39/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/39 | 21/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Tu | |||
| R1 Wu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-72 7-69 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 114-102 | 114-102 | |
| Total points | 216 | 216 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 71/108 | 71/108 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 48/71 | 48/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/37 | 21/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLLLLLL
LWLLWLLWLW Tennis Scores in Gwangju Challenger
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Yibing WuWu (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Emilio GomezGomez – Mukund SasikumarSasikumar (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Keegan SmithSmith (6-4 2-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Emilio GomezGomez – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Jason JungJung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Uisung ParkPark – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
