Maximilian Marterer and Jason Jung will face off in the 2nd round of the Gwangju Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on SHOW COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Maximilian Marterer who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Maximilian Marterer is the pick to win this match.
Maximilian Marterer -> 1.44
Jason Jung -> 2.7
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Maximilian Marterer vs. Jason Jung
There is no head to head record between Maximilian Marterer and Jason Jung since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Maximilian Marterer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-19 | 3-5 | 5-8 | 0-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-27 | 12-10 | 13-10 | 12-4 | 5-2 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 39-28 | 11-7 | 17-15 | 7-5 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-28 | 4-2 | 15-16 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 3-2 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 0-2 | 9-6 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
Ranked no. 161, Maximilian reached the 2nd round after beating Marek Gengel 6-3 3-6 7-5.
In the 1st round, Maximilian defeated Gengel (6-3 3-6 7-5). During the match, Marterer scored 93 points vs Gengel’s 92. Marterer was pretty aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about the service games, Marterer fired 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Maximilian Marterer was quite effective on serve to win 77% (46/60) of his 1st serve and 52% (23/44) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Marterer was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Gengel twice.
Marterer has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (320-212). 8-4 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Marterer has a composed 65-41 record in the last years on hard.
Marterer’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Braunschweig Challenger.
Maximilian has an overall 33-23 win-loss record in 2022, 8-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Gwangju Challenger
Marterer has never competed in this tournament before.
Jason Jung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 453, Jung reached the 2nd round after beating Naoki Tajima 6-0 6-3 and Nicolas Barrientos 6-1 4-6 7-66.
In the 1st round, The Chinese defeated Barrientos (6-1 4-6 7-66). During the match Jung scored 102 points vs Barrientos’s 92. Jung was quite aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Jung scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was not very consistent on his 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Jason Jung lost the serve 6 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Jung put 62% of his first serves in, winning 64% (39/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (16/38) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Barrientos 8 times after converting 53% of his break points (8/15).
The Chinese has a compiled 16-21 win-loss record in 2022, 7-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Marterer | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 45 |
| Pts | 93-92 | 164-130 |
| Total Points | 185 | 294 |
| Winners | 46 | 63 |
| %Winners | 49% | 38% |
Marterer played 1 match while Jung competed in 2 matches. Jung started his run from the qualifications while Marterer had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Maximilian Marterer surrendered 1 set, while Jason Jung lost 1 set. Marterer has played 2 set(s) less than Jung (3 vs 5). Therefore, Marterer played 15 games less than Jung. The German scored 46 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Jung bagged 63 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Marterer | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 1.5 |
| 1st in | 60/104 | 95/149 |
| %1st in | 58% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 46/60 | 63/95 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 23/44 | 26/54 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 48% |
Marterer blasted 4 aces . Jung struck 3 aces (1.5 per match). Marterer won 77% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Jung won 66% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Marterer | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 13 |
| Converted | 2/2 | 13/25 |
| % Converted | 100% | 52% |
| Conceded | 8 | 22 |
| Saved | 7 | 15 |
| % Saved | 88% | 68% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 7 |
The German broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. Maximilian conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded. Jung broke his opponents 13 times with a 52% conversion rate. Jung conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded.
| Marterer | |||
| R1 Gengel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 93-92 | 93-92 | |
| Total points | 185 | 185 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 60/104 | 60/104 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 46/60 | 46/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/44 | 23/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Jung | ||||
| Q3 Tajima |
R1 Barrientos |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | 6-1 4-6 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 30 | 45 | |
| pts | 62-38 | 102-92 | 164-130 | |
| Total points | 100 | 194 | 294 | |
| Winners | 24 | 39 | 63 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 11 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 34/50 | 61/99 | 95/149 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 62% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 24/34 | 39/61 | 63/95 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 64% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 16/38 | 26/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 42% | 48% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 8 | 13 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 8/15 | 13/25 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 53% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 14 | 22 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 8/14 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 57% | 145% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLLWLWL
LWWWLW Tennis Scores in Gwangju Challenger
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Keegan SmithSmith (6-4 2-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Yibing WuWu (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Emilio GomezGomez – Mukund SasikumarSasikumar (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Emilio GomezGomez – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Jason JungJung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Uisung ParkPark – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
