Christian Langmo and Luke Saville will clash against each other in the 1st round of the Tiburon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 5:30 pm on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Luke Saville who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Luke Saville is the pick to win this match.
Luke Saville -> 1.75
Christian Langmo -> 1.99
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christian Langmo vs. Luke Saville
There is no head to head record between Christian Langmo and Luke Saville since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Christian Langmo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-18 | 18-13 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 415, Christian got to the 1st round after beating Keenan Mayo 2-6 6-1 7-5 and Aidan Mayo 6-75 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications against Mayo, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-3 6-2). During the match, Langmo scored 101 points vs Mayo’s 76. Christian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about the service games, Langmo made 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Christian Langmo was pretty efficient on serve to win 78% (43/55) of his 1st serve and 63% (26/41) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Christian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Mayo 4 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Langmo started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has dropped 2 set in this competition to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Langmo has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 60% of his matches (143-97). 14-13 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Langmo has an aggregate120-76 record in the last 6 years on hard.
Christian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Bolzano.
Christian has a compiled 23-21 win-loss record in 2022, 14-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
Christian has never competed in this tournament before.
Luke Saville
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-15 | 10-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-26 | 28-18 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 14-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-11 | 18-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 817, the Australian got to the 1st round after beating Martin Damm 7-65 3-6 6-2 and Donald Young 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Luke had a good straight sets win against Young (6-3 6-4). During the match Saville scored 65 points vs Young’s 55. Saville was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Saville fired 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Luke Saville was very effective on serve to win 77% (30/39) of his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Saville broke Young 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
The Australian has a compiled 8-6 win-loss record in 2022, 8-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Langmo | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 57 | 49 |
| Pts | 187-156 | 168-149 |
| Total Points | 343 | 317 |
| Winners | 82 | 68 |
| %Winners | 44% | 40% |
Both Langmo and Saville played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Christian Langmo surrendered 2 sets, while Luke Saville dropped 1 set. Langmo has played 1 set more than Saville (6 vs 5). Therefore, Langmo played 8 games more than Saville. Langmo scored 82 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Saville recorded 68 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Langmo | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 4.5 | 5 |
| 1st in | 112/187 | 91/143 |
| %1st in | 60% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 82/112 | 68/91 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 45/75 | 27/52 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 52% |
Langmo fired 9 aces (4.5 per match). Saville made 10 aces (5 per match). Langmo won 73% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Saville won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Langmo | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 7 |
| Converted | 8/10 | 7/20 |
| % Converted | 80% | 35% |
| Conceded | 15 | 8 |
| Saved | 11 | 4 |
| % Saved | 73% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Christian broke his opponents 8 times with a 80% conversion rate. Langmo conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. Luke broke his opponents 7 times with a 35% conversion rate. Saville conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Langmo | ||||
| Q1 Mayo |
Q3 Mayo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-1 7-5 | 6-75 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 30 | 57 | |
| pts | 86-80 | 101-76 | 187-156 | |
| Total points | 166 | 177 | 343 | |
| Winners | 39 | 43 | 82 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 43% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 57/91 | 55/96 | 112/187 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 57% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 39/57 | 43/55 | 82/112 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 78% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/34 | 26/41 | 45/75 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 63% | 60% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/4 | 8/10 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 100% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 7 | 15 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 6/7 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 86% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Saville | ||||
| Q1 Damm |
Q3 Young |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 3-6 6-2 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 19 | 49 | |
| pts | 103-94 | 65-55 | 168-149 | |
| Total points | 197 | 120 | 317 | |
| Winners | 38 | 30 | 68 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 46% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 2 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 52/85 | 39/58 | 91/143 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 67% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 38/52 | 30/39 | 68/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 77% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/33 | 10/19 | 27/52 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 53% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 3/9 | 7/20 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 33% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 1 | 8 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 0/1 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 0% | 29% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWWWL
LLWLLLLLWW Tennis Scores in Tiburon Challenger
- Ben SheltonShelton – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (3-6 6-2 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis (6-3 7-62) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Evan ZhuZhu (4-6 6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Jonas Eriksson ZivertsEriksson Ziverts (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Valentin VacherotVacherot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Luke SavilleSaville (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sam RifficeRiffice – Evan KingKing (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Paul JubbJubb (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
