Yunseong Chung and Ji Sung Nam will clash against each other in the 1st round of the Gwangju Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yunseong Chung who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Yunseong Chung is the pick to win this match.
Yunseong Chung -> 1.49
Ji Sung Nam -> 2.47
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Yunseong Chung vs. Ji Sung Nam
This will be the 4th time that Yunseong Chung and Ji Sung Nam fight against each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Chung (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Sung Nam won 3-6 6-4 7-6(3) in the 1st round in the Columbus Challenger back in 2021.
Yunseong Chung
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 10-10 | 10-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 30-22 | 20-16 | 5-4 | 3-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 34-25 | 23-17 | 7-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 28-15 | 21-10 | 5-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 397, Yunseong reached the 1st round after beating Seita Watanabe 6-2 7-61.
In the qualifications, The Korean had a good straight sets win against Watanabe (6-2 7-61). During the match, Chung scored 79 points vs Watanabe’s 63. Chung was very aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Chung managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Yunseong Chung lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Chung put 63% of his first serves in, winning 72% (36/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (13/29) on the 2nd serve. Yunseong broke Watanabe 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Chung has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 58% of his matches (238-171). 19-13 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Chung has an overall180-123 record in the last 9 years on hard.
Chung’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Monastir.
Chung has a composed 28-20 win-loss record in 2022, 19-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Gwangju Challenger
Ji Sung Nam
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 6-7 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 15-20 | 13-15 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 26-19 | 24-13 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 4-7 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 590, the Korean got to the 1st round after beating Hoyoung Roh 6-2 6-1 and Shinji Hazawa 6-1 7-63.
In the qualifications, The Korean had a good straight sets win against Hazawa (6-1 7-63). During the match Sung Nam scored 72 points vs Hazawa’s 60. Sung Nam was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Sung Nam blasted 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Ji Sung Nam lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Sung Nam put 65% of his first serves in, winning 69% (38/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (14/29) on the 2nd serve. Sung Nam broke Hazawa 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Ji started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this event to conquer 59% of the points he played.
The Korean’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Chiang Rai.
The Korean has a composed 22-14 win-loss record in 2022, 20-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Chung | Sung Nam |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 2 |
Tot Set | 2 | 4 |
Tot Games | 21 | 35 |
Pts | 79-63 | 127-88 |
Total Points | 142 | 215 |
Winners | 36 | 58 |
%Winners | 46% | 46% |
Chung played 1 match while Sung Nam competed in 2 matches. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Chung has played 2 set(s) less than Sung Nam (2 vs 4). Therefore, Chung played 14 games less than Sung Nam. Yunseong scored 36 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The Korean fired 58 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Chung | Sung Nam |
---|---|---|
Aces | 8 | 6 |
Avg per match | 8 | 3 |
1st in | 50/79 | 80/120 |
%1st in | 63% | 67% |
1st pts | 36/50 | 58/80 |
%1st pts | 72% | 73% |
2nd pts | 13/29 | 21/40 |
%2nd pts | 45% | 53% |
Chung bagged 8 aces . Sung Nam made 6 aces (3 per match). Chung won 72% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Sung Nam won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Chung | Sung Nam |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 10 |
Converted | 4/6 | 10/16 |
% Converted | 67% | 63% |
Conceded | 6 | 14 |
Saved | 4 | 11 |
% Saved | 67% | 79% |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Chung broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Chung lost his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Korean broke his opponents 10 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Korean conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
Chung | |||
Q3 Watanabe |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 7-61 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 79-63 | 79-63 | |
Total points | 142 | 142 | |
Winners | 36 | 36 | |
%Winners | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 50/79 | 50/79 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 36/50 | 36/50 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 13/29 | 13/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Sung Nam | ||||
Q1 Roh |
Q3 Hazawa |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-1 7-63 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 20 | 35 | |
pts | 55-28 | 72-60 | 127-88 | |
Total points | 83 | 132 | 215 | |
Winners | 20 | 38 | 58 | |
%Winners | 36% | 53% | 46% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
1st in | 25/36 | 55/84 | 80/120 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 65% | 67% | |
1st pts | 20/25 | 38/55 | 58/80 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 69% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 7/11 | 14/29 | 21/40 | |
% 2nd pts | 64% | 48% | 53% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
Converted | 6/9 | 4/7 | 10/16 | |
Converted % | 67% | 57% | 63% | |
Conceded | 4 | 10 | 14 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 8/10 | 11 | |
Saved % | 75% | 80% | 155% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Gwangju Challenger
- Yibing WuWu – Sanhui ShinShin (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marc PolmansPolmans – John MillmanMillman (6-4 0-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Emilio GomezGomez – Ben PataelPatael (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas BarrientosBarrientos – Jason JungJung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Keegan SmithSmith (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Marek GengelGengel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Skander MansouriMansouri – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Ji Hoon SonHoon Son (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duckhee LeeLee – Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Uisung ParkPark – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-0) – H2H and prediction