Christian Langmo and Aidan Mayo will play each other in the qualifications of the Tiburon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Christian Langmo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Christian Langmo is the pick to win this match.
Christian Langmo -> 1.59
Aidan Mayo -> 2.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christian Langmo vs. Aidan Mayo
There is no head to head record between Christian Langmo and Aidan Mayo since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Christian Langmo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-18 | 18-13 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 415, Christian reached the qualifications after defeating Keenan Mayo 2-6 6-1 7-5.
In the qualifications against Mayo, Christian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-1 7-5). During the match, Langmo scored 86 points vs Mayo’s 80. The American was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Langmo made 3 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Christian Langmo lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Langmo put 63% of his first serves in, winning 68% (39/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Mayo 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Langmo has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 59% of his matches (142-97). 13-13 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Langmo has a composed119-76 record in the last 6 years on hard.
Christian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Bolzano.
Christian has a composed 22-21 win-loss record in 2022, 13-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tiburon Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Aidan Mayo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-16 | 3-8 | 4-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-28 | 24-15 | 2-5 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-25 | 27-19 | 4-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-8 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 554, Mayo got to the qualifications after defeating Carlos Gomez-Herrera 7-65 5-7 6-3.
In the qualifications, Mayo defeated Gomez-Herrera (7-65 5-7 6-3). During the match Mayo scored 122 points vs Gomez-Herrera’s 112. Mayo was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
About the serving games, Mayo recorded 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Aidan Mayo was pretty effective on serve to win 72% (42/58) of his 1st serve and 63% (27/43) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The American broke Gomez-Herrera twice after converting 10% of his break points (2/20).
Mayo’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Santo Domingo and the Granby Challenger.
Mayo has a composed 28-19 win-loss record in 2022, 24-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Langmo | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 34 |
| Pts | 86-80 | 122-112 |
| Total Points | 166 | 234 |
| Winners | 39 | 42 |
| %Winners | 45% | 34% |
Both Langmo and Mayo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Christian Langmo conceded 1 set, while Aidan Mayo lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Langmo and Mayo have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Langmo played 7 games less than Mayo. Christian scored 39 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Mayo struck 42 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Langmo | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 5 |
| 1st in | 57/91 | 58/101 |
| %1st in | 63% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 39/57 | 42/58 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 19/34 | 27/43 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 63% |
Langmo recorded 3 aces . Mayo managed to score 5 aces . Langmo won 68% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Mayo won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Langmo | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 2/20 |
| % Converted | 67% | 10% |
| Conceded | 8 | 4 |
| Saved | 5 | 2 |
| % Saved | 63% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Langmo conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent twice with a 10% conversion rate. Aidan conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Langmo | |||
| Q1 Mayo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 86-80 | 86-80 | |
| Total points | 166 | 166 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 57/91 | 57/91 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 39/57 | 39/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/34 | 19/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Mayo | |||
| Q1 Gomez-Herrera |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 5-7 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 122-112 | 122-112 | |
| Total points | 234 | 234 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 58/101 | 58/101 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 42/58 | 42/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/43 | 27/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/20 | 2/20 | |
| Converted % | 10% | 10% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWWWL
LLWLWLLWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Donald YoungYoung – Luke SavilleSaville (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan KingKing – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Alfredo PerezPerez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Darian KingKing – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Jonas Eriksson ZivertsEriksson Ziverts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Valentin VacherotVacherot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Paul JubbJubb (1-2) – H2H and prediction
