Botic Van De Zandschulp and Liam Broady will face off in the 2nd round of the Tel Aviv Watergen Open for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:00 pm on Centre Court. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.24
Liam Broady -> 4.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Liam Broady
This will be the 4th time that Botic Van De Zandschulp and Liam Broady fight against each other. The head to head is 2-1 for Van De Zandschulp (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Broady won 7-6(5) 7-6(8) in the qualifications in at the French Open back in 2020.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 35, Botic reached the 2nd round after beating Joao Sousa 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round, Van De Zandschulp had a good straight sets win against Sousa (6-2 6-3). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 67 points vs Sousa’s 46. Van De Zandschulp was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van De Zandschulp scored 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 71% of his first serves in, winning 83% (29/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (6/14) on the 2nd serve. Van De Zandschulp broke Sousa 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 67% of his matches (284-143). 5-1 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Van De Zandschulp has an aggregate72-30 match record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Botic’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in Munich.
Van De Zandschulp has a compiled 36-23 win-loss record in 2022, 5-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Tel Aviv
Botic has never competed in this tournament before.
Liam Broady
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-18 | 8-13 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-28 | 23-9 | 2-4 | 15-9 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-25 | 16-9 | 2-5 | 10-5 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-26 | 19-10 | 7-5 | 16-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 2-4 | 9-4 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 174, Broady reached the 2nd round after beating Roberto Marcora 6-3 6-2, Nicolas Alvarez Varona 7-61 6-1 and Hamad Medjedovic 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Medjedovic (7-5 6-3). During the match Broady scored 65 points vs Medjedovic’s 50. The Brit was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Broady managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Liam Broady was very effective on serve to win 75% (21/28) of his 1st serve and 61% (22/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Broady broke Medjedovic 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
The Brit’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Phoenix Challenger.
Broady has a compiled 33-23 win-loss record in 2022, 7-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 58 |
| Pts | 67-46 | 211-159 |
| Total Points | 113 | 370 |
| Winners | 29 | 75 |
| %Winners | 43% | 36% |
Van De Zandschulp played 1 match while Broady competed in 3 matches. Broady started his run from the qualifications while Van De Zandschulp had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 4 set(s) less than Broady (2 vs 6). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 41 games less than Broady. Van De Zandschulp scored 29 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Liam scored 75 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 6 |
| 1st in | 35/49 | 109/199 |
| %1st in | 71% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 75/109 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 6/14 | 49/90 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 54% |
Van De Zandschulp made 8 aces . Broady blasted 18 aces (6 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 83% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Broady won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 14 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 14/21 |
| % Converted | 44% | 67% |
| Conceded | 2 | 13 |
| Saved | 2 | 6 |
| % Saved | 100% | 46% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 7 |
The Dutch broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Botic had a solid display on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 2 break points. Liam broke his opponents 14 times with a 67% conversion rate. Liam conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 46% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Sousa |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 67-46 | 67-46 | |
| Total points | 113 | 113 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 35/49 | 35/49 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 29/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Broady | |||||
| Q1 Marcora |
Q3 Alvarez |
R1 Medjedovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 7-61 6-1 | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 20 | 21 | 58 | |
| pts | 72-57 | 74-52 | 65-50 | 211-159 | |
| Total points | 129 | 126 | 115 | 370 | |
| Winners | 28 | 26 | 21 | 75 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 35% | 32% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 4 | 8 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 44/71 | 37/64 | 28/64 | 109/199 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 58% | 44% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 28/44 | 26/37 | 21/28 | 75/109 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 70% | 75% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 13/27 | 22/36 | 49/90 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 48% | 61% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/5 | 4/5 | 14/21 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 100% | 80% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | 3 | 13 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 2/5 | 1/3 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 40% | 33% | 133% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWWWLL
LWWWLLLWLW Tennis Scores in Tel Aviv
- Marin CilicCilic – Dominic ThiemThiem (6-76 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maxime CressyCressy – Sebastian KordaKorda (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Novak DjokovicDjokovic – Pablo AndujarAndujar (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Liam BroadyBroady (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Edan LeshemLeshem – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
