Govind Nanda and Donald Young will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Charleston Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Govind Nanda who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Govind Nanda is the pick to win this match.
Govind Nanda -> 1.34
Donald Young -> 3.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Govind Nanda vs. Donald Young
There is no head to head record between Govind Nanda and Donald Young since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Govind Nanda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-6 | 1-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-26 | 22-19 | 5-3 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-14 | 21-10 | 2-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 361 (career-high), Govind reached the 2nd round after defeating Ryan Harrison 7-5 2-2 ret. and Emilio Nava 5-7 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round against Nava, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-2 7-5). During the match, Nanda scored 102 points vs Nava’s 88. Govind was pretty aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nanda recorded 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Govind Nanda lost the serve 5 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Nanda put 67% of his first serves in, winning 63% (38/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (18/29) on the 2nd serve. Nanda broke Nava 7 times after converting 47% of his break points (7/15).
Nanda has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 60% of his matches (104-69). 21-15 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Nanda has an aggregate80-47 record in the last 5 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Tulsa.
Govind has a composed 26-22 win-loss record in 2022, 21-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Donald Young
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4-13 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-20 | 11-12 | 2-3 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 10-15 | 5-9 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 26-28 | 23-22 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 628, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Christian Langmo 7-5 6-0, Ezekiel Clark 7-64 7-67 and Omni Kumar 2-6 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round against Kumar, Donald recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-2 6-1). During the match Young scored 92 points vs Kumar’s 79. Donald was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Young scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 7 double faults. Donald Young lost the serve 5 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Young put 49% of his first serves in, winning 59% (24/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (18/42) on the 2nd serve. Young broke Kumar 8 times after converting 67% of his break points (8/12).
The American has a compiled 14-16 win-loss record in 2022, 8-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nanda | Young |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 48 | 67 |
| Pts | 162-136 | 248-200 |
| Total Points | 298 | 448 |
| Winners | 60 | 79 |
| %Winners | 37% | 32% |
Nanda played 2 matches while Young competed in 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Govind Nanda surrendered 1 set, while Donald Young conceded 1 set. Nanda has played 1 set(s) less than Young (6 vs 7). Therefore, Nanda played 19 games less than Young. Govind scored 60 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Donald made 79 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nanda | Young |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 3.5 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 93/136 | 121/224 |
| %1st in | 68% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 60/93 | 79/121 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 26/43 | 51/103 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 50% |
Nanda managed to score 7 aces (3.5 per match). Young recorded 7 aces (2.3 per match). Nanda won 65% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Young won 65% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nanda | Young |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 18 |
| Converted | 10/23 | 18/27 |
| % Converted | 43% | 67% |
| Conceded | 13 | 31 |
| Saved | 6 | 20 |
| % Saved | 46% | 65% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 11 |
The American broke his opponents 10 times with a 43% conversion rate. The American lost his serve 7 times and he saved 46% of the break points that he conceded. Young broke his opponents 18 times with a 67% conversion rate. Young conceded his serve 11 times and he saved 65% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nanda | |||||
| Q1 Harrison |
Q3 Kirchheimer |
R1 Nava |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 2-2 ret. | 6-1 6-1 | 5-7 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 14 | 32 | 62 | |
| pts | 60-48 | – | 102-88 | 162-136 | |
| Total points | 108 | 0 | 190 | 298 | |
| Winners | 22 | 38 | 60 | ||
| %Winners | 37% | 0% | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | ||
| 1st in | 33/47 | / | 60/89 | 93/136 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 0% | 67% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 22/33 | / | 38/60 | 60/93 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 0% | 63% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | / | 18/29 | 26/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 0% | 62% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 7 | 10 | ||
| Converted | 3/8 | / | 7/15 | 10/23 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 0% | 47% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 10 | 13 | ||
| Saved | 1/3 | 0/ | 5/10 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 33% | – | 50% | 28% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 | 7 | ||
| Young | |||||
| Q1 Langmo |
Q3 Clark |
R1 Kumar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-0 | 7-64 7-67 | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 26 | 23 | 67 | |
| pts | 59-37 | 97-84 | 92-79 | 248-200 | |
| Total points | 96 | 181 | 171 | 448 | |
| Winners | 21 | 34 | 24 | 79 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 35% | 26% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 4 | 1 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 10 | 7 | 19 | |
| 1st in | 27/48 | 53/93 | 41/83 | 121/224 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 57% | 49% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 34/53 | 24/41 | 79/121 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 64% | 59% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/21 | 16/40 | 18/42 | 51/103 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 40% | 43% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 8 | 18 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 6/9 | 8/12 | 18/27 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 15 | 15 | 31 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 9/15 | 10/15 | 20 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 60% | 67% | 76% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWL
Tennis Scores in Charleston Challenger
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Evan ZhuZhu (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (5-7 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Dominic Stephan StrickerStephan Stricker (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Donald YoungYoung – Omni KumarKumar (2-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Govind NandaNanda – Emilio NavaNava (5-7 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Gianni RossRoss (6-3 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Valentin VacherotVacherot (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Leandro RiediRiedi – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-5 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (7-67 7-61) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (4-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Charles BroomBroom (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Donald YoungYoung – Govind NandaNanda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Garrett JohnsJohns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
