Giovanni Oradini and Garrett Johns will face off in the 2nd round of the Charleston Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Giovanni Oradini who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Giovanni Oradini is the pick to win this match.
Giovanni Oradini -> 1.72
Garrett Johns -> 2.07
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Giovanni Oradini vs. Garrett Johns
There is no head to head record between Giovanni Oradini and Garrett Johns since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Giovanni Oradini
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-25 | 1-3 | 17-18 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-33 | 5-6 | 32-19 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 62-30 | 27-11 | 25-11 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-10 | 13-5 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 399, Giovanni got to the 2nd round after beating Aidan Mayo 4-6 6-1 6-4, Gage Brymer 5-7 7-5 6-2 and Ernesto Escobedo 5-7 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Escobedo, Giovanni recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-4 6-3). During the match, Oradini and Escobedo scored the same amount of points (94). However, the world no. 399 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Giovanni was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Oradini fired 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Giovanni Oradini lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Oradini put 72% of his first serves in, winning 71% (44/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (10/24) on the 2nd serve. Giovanni broke Escobedo 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Oradini has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 70% of his matches (105-45). 25-9 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Oradini has an overall39-15 record in the last 5 years on hard.
Giovanni’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Monastir,M15 Sharm ElSheikh and M15 Warmbad Villach.
The Italian has a composed 57-24 win-loss record in 2022, 25-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
Oradini has never competed in this tournament before.
Garrett Johns
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-15 | 4-7 | 9-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-16 | 29-11 | 5-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-8 | 13-4 | 6-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-9 | 9-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 720 (career-high), the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Martin Damm 6-4 4-6 6-3, Tennys Sandgren 3-6 6-3 6-2 and Gianni Ross 6-3 5-7 6-1.
In the 1st round, The American defeated Ross (6-3 5-7 6-1). During the match Johns scored 110 points vs Ross’s 94. Johns was quite aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Johns recorded 16 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Garrett Johns lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Johns put 50% of his first serves in, winning 81% (43/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (24/53) on the 2nd serve. Garrett broke Ross 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Garrett’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Memphis.
The American has an aggregate 19-6 win-loss record in 2022, 13-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Oradini | Johns |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 90 | 83 |
| Pts | 304-273 | 297-258 |
| Total Points | 577 | 555 |
| Winners | 132 | 115 |
| %Winners | 43% | 39% |
Both Oradini and Johns played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Giovanni Oradini lost 3 sets, while Garrett Johns lost 3 sets. Talking about their workload, Oradini and Johns have played the same amount of sets 9. However, Oradini played 7 games more than Johns. Giovanni scored 132 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The American bagged 115 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Oradini | Johns |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 20 | 28 |
| Avg per match | 6.7 | 9.3 |
| 1st in | 186/276 | 147/273 |
| %1st in | 67% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 132/186 | 115/147 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 47/90 | 65/126 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 52% |
Oradini fired 20 aces (6.7 per match). Johns recorded 28 aces (9.3 per match). Oradini won 71% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Johns won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Oradini | Johns |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 12 |
| Converted | 14/37 | 12/26 |
| % Converted | 38% | 46% |
| Conceded | 19 | 21 |
| Saved | 11 | 16 |
| % Saved | 58% | 76% |
| Times Broken | 8 | 5 |
The Italian broke his opponents 14 times with a 38% conversion rate. Giovanni lost his serve 8 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded. Garrett broke his opponents 12 times with a 46% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.
| Oradini | |||||
| Q1 Mayo |
Q3 Brymer |
R1 Escobedo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | 5-7 7-5 6-2 | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 32 | 31 | 90 | |
| pts | 94-82 | 116-97 | 94-94 | 304-273 | |
| Total points | 176 | 213 | 188 | 577 | |
| Winners | 38 | 50 | 44 | 132 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 43% | 47% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 9 | 8 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 60/97 | 64/93 | 62/86 | 186/276 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 69% | 72% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 38/60 | 50/64 | 44/62 | 132/186 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 78% | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/37 | 14/29 | 10/24 | 47/90 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 48% | 42% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 5 | 14 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 5/18 | 5/12 | 14/37 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 28% | 42% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 6 | 5 | 19 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 3/6 | 2/5 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 50% | 40% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Johns | |||||
| Q1 Damm |
Q3 Sandgren |
R1 Ross |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 5-7 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 26 | 28 | 83 | |
| pts | 97-89 | 90-75 | 110-94 | 297-258 | |
| Total points | 186 | 165 | 204 | 555 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | 43 | 115 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 40% | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | 16 | 28 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 6 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 49/89 | 45/78 | 53/106 | 147/273 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 58% | 50% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 36/49 | 36/45 | 43/53 | 115/147 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 80% | 81% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/40 | 19/33 | 24/53 | 65/126 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 58% | 45% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 3/6 | 5/12 | 12/26 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | 42% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 3 | 10 | 21 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 2/3 | 8/10 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 67% | 80% | 74% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLLLWL
LLWWLWWLLW Tennis Scores in Charleston Challenger
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Dominic Stephan StrickerStephan Stricker (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Donald YoungYoung – Omni KumarKumar (2-6 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Govind NandaNanda – Emilio NavaNava (5-7 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Gianni RossRoss (6-3 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Valentin VacherotVacherot (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Leandro RiediRiedi – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-5 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Evan ZhuZhu (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (5-7 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Charles BroomBroom (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (7-67 7-61) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (4-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Donald YoungYoung – Govind NandaNanda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Garrett JohnsJohns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
