Omni Kumar and Donald Young will clash against each other in the 1st round of the Charleston Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 12:00 pm on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Donald Young who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Donald Young is the pick to win this match.
Donald Young -> 1.57
Omni Kumar -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Omni Kumar vs. Donald Young
There is no head to head record between Omni Kumar and Donald Young since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Omni Kumar
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-9 | 8-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-32 | 54-31 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-36 | 47-29 | 1-1 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 75-29 | 73-27 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-10 | 16-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 466, the American got to the 1st round after beating Alafia Ayeni 6-3 6-1.
Kumar has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 64% of his matches (157-89). 30-21 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kumar has an aggregate154-82 match record in the last 5 years on hard.
Kumar’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir.
The American has an overall 31-26 win-loss record in 2022, 30-21 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Donald Young
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4-13 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-20 | 11-12 | 2-3 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 10-15 | 5-9 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 26-28 | 23-22 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 628, Young reached the 1st round after beating Christian Langmo 7-5 6-0 and Ezekiel Clark 7-64 7-67.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Clark (7-64 7-67). During the match Young scored 97 points vs Clark’s 84. Young was pretty aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Young blasted 4 aces and he was not very solid on his 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Donald Young lost the serve 6 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Young put 57% of his first serves in, winning 64% (34/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (16/40) on the 2nd serve. Donald broke Clark 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Donald started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to win 56% of the points he played.
Young has a compiled 13-16 win-loss record in 2022, 7-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kumar | Young |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 44 |
| Pts | 58-41 | 156-121 |
| Total Points | 99 | 277 |
| Winners | 21 | 55 |
| %Winners | 36% | 35% |
Kumar played 1 match while Young competed in 2 matches. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Kumar has played 2 set(s) less than Young (2 vs 4). Therefore, Kumar played 28 games less than Young. Omni scored 21 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The American made 55 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kumar | Young |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
| 1st in | 22/50 | 80/141 |
| %1st in | 44% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 21/22 | 55/80 |
| %1st pts | 95% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 33/61 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 54% |
Kumar didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Young struck 6 aces (3 per match). Kumar won 95% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Young won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kumar | Young |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 10 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 10/15 |
| % Converted | 67% | 67% |
| Conceded | 2 | 16 |
| Saved | 2 | 10 |
| % Saved | 100% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 |
Kumar broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Kumar was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. Donald broke his opponents 10 times with a 67% conversion rate. Donald conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kumar | ||||
| Q1 Ayeni |
Q3 Kypson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 18 | 34 | |
| pts | 58-41 | – | 58-41 | |
| Total points | 99 | 0 | 99 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | ||
| %Winners | 36% | 0% | 36% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | ||
| 1st in | 22/50 | / | 22/50 | |
| % 1st in | 44% | 0% | 44% | |
| 1st pts | 21/22 | / | 21/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 95% | 0% | 95% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | / | 15/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 0% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | ||
| Converted | 4/6 | / | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | ||
| Saved | 2/2 | 0/ | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | ||
| Young | ||||
| Q1 Langmo |
Q3 Clark |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-0 | 7-64 7-67 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 26 | 44 | |
| pts | 59-37 | 97-84 | 156-121 | |
| Total points | 96 | 181 | 277 | |
| Winners | 21 | 34 | 55 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 10 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 27/48 | 53/93 | 80/141 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 34/53 | 55/80 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 64% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/21 | 16/40 | 33/61 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 40% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 6/9 | 10/15 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 15 | 16 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 9/15 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 60% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWLWWW
Tennis Scores in Charleston Challenger
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (4-6 6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (7-67 7-61) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Charles BroomBroom (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Donald YoungYoung – Omni KumarKumar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Valentin VacherotVacherot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (2-4) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianni RossRoss – Garrett JohnsJohns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
