Omni Kumar and Patrick Kypson will play each other in the qualifications of the Charleston Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Kypson who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Patrick Kypson is the pick to win this match.
Patrick Kypson -> 1.42
Omni Kumar -> 2.69
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Omni Kumar vs. Patrick Kypson
This will be the 2nd time that Omni Kumar and Patrick Kypson clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Kypson (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Kypson won 6-4 7-5 in the 1st round in M25 Edwardsville back in July 2022.
Omni Kumar
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-17 | 21-13 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-32 | 54-31 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-36 | 47-29 | 1-1 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 75-29 | 73-27 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-10 | 16-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 466, the American reached the qualifications after beating Alafia Ayeni 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Ayeni (6-3 6-1). During the match, Kumar scored 58 points vs Ayeni’s 41. Kumar was exceptionally aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kumar wasn’t able to score even 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 2 double faults. Omni Kumar was pretty effective on serve to win 95% (21/22) of his 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Kumar broke Ayeni 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Kumar has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 64% of his matches (157-88). 30-20 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kumar has an overall154-81 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.
Kumar’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir.
The American has an overall 31-25 win-loss record in 2022, 30-20 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston Challenger
Omni has never competed in this tournament before.
Patrick Kypson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-20 | 6-9 | 4-7 | 5-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-9 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 684, Kypson got to the qualifications after beating Nick Chappell 4-6 6-2 6-0.
In the qualifications against Chappell, Patrick recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 6-0). During the match Kypson scored 76 points vs Chappell’s 54. Patrick was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Kypson blasted 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Patrick Kypson was exceptionally effective on serve to win 76% (29/38) of his 1st serve and 62% (18/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Kypson broke Chappell 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Kypson’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Champaign and M25 Edwardsville.
Kypson has an aggregate 16-9 win-loss record in 2022, 10-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kumar | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 24 |
| Pts | 58-41 | 76-54 |
| Total Points | 99 | 130 |
| Winners | 21 | 29 |
| %Winners | 36% | 38% |
Both Kumar and Kypson played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Patrick Kypson surrendered 1 set while Omni Kumar hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Kumar has played 1 set(s) less than Kypson (2 vs 3). Therefore, Kumar played 8 games less than Kypson. Omni scored 21 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Patrick bagged 29 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kumar | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 3 |
| 1st in | 22/50 | 38/67 |
| %1st in | 44% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 21/22 | 29/38 |
| %1st pts | 95% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 18/29 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 62% |
Kumar didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Kypson fired 3 aces . Kumar won 95% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Kypson won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kumar | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 6/8 |
| % Converted | 67% | 75% |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Omni broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The American had a solid display on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 2 break points. Kypson broke his opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kumar | |||
| Q1 Ayeni |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 58-41 | 58-41 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 22/50 | 22/50 | |
| % 1st in | 44% | 44% | |
| 1st pts | 21/22 | 21/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 95% | 95% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 15/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Kypson | |||
| Q1 Chappell |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 76-54 | 76-54 | |
| Total points | 130 | 130 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 38/67 | 38/67 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 29/38 | 29/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/29 | 18/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWLWW
LLLWLLWLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Donald YoungYoung – Ezekiel ClarkClark (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Garrett JohnsJohns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Valentin VacherotVacherot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew HarrisHarris – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Gage BrymerBrymer (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianni RossRoss – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Omni KumarKumar (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
