Daniel Michalski and Jeremy Jahn will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Lisbon Challenger for the 1st time in their career. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Michalski who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Michalski is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Michalski -> 1.41
Jeremy Jahn -> 2.73
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Michalski vs. Jeremy Jahn
There is no head to head record between Daniel Michalski and Jeremy Jahn since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Daniel Michalski
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-17 | 1-6 | 15-10 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-25 | 4-6 | 36-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 51-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-25 | 0-3 | 47-20 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-10 | 7-3 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 247, the Pole reached the qualifications after defeating Inigo Cervantes 6-2 4-6 7-66.
In the qualifications, Michalski defeated Cervantes (6-2 4-6 7-66). During the match, Michalski and Cervantes scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 247 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Pole was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Regarding the service games, Michalski couldn’t to score even 1 ace throughout the encounter and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Daniel Michalski conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Michalski has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 63% of his matches (145-84). 36-16 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Michalski has a composed119-62 record in the last 6 years on clay.
The Pole’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Cairo and the Zadar Challenger.
Michalski has an aggregate 36-16 win-loss record in 2022, 36-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lisbon Challenger
Jeremy Jahn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 25-25 | 0-0 | 23-20 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-21 | 0-0 | 17-16 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-12 | 0-0 | 1-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2019 | 32-19 | 2-4 | 21-12 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 690, the German got to the qualifications after beating Lucas Gerch 6-2 7-5.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Gerch (6-2 7-5). During the match Jahn scored 67 points vs Gerch’s 48. Jeremy was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Jahn scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jeremy Jahn was pretty effective on serve to win 74% (23/31) of his 1st serve and 71% (15/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jahn broke Gerch 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Jahn’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Oldenzaal.
Jeremy has a composed 17-19 win-loss record in 2022, 16-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lisbon Challenger
Jahn has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Michalski | Jahn |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 20 |
| Pts | 0-0 | 67-48 |
| Total Points | 0 | 115 |
| Winners | 0 | 23 |
| %Winners | 0% | 34% |
Both Michalski and Jahn played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Daniel Michalski surrendered 1 set while Jeremy Jahn hasn’t dropped a set so far. Michalski has played 1 set more than Jahn (3 vs 2). Therefore, Michalski played 11 games more than Jahn. Daniel scored 0 winners (0% of the total points). On the other side, Jahn made 23 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Michalski | Jahn |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 1 |
| 1st in | 0/0 | 31/52 |
| %1st in | 0% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | 23/31 |
| %1st pts | 0% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | 15/21 |
| %2nd pts | 0% | 71% |
Michalski didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Jahn struck 1 ace . Michalski won 0% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 0% of the points. On the other side, Jahn won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Michalski | Jahn |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 4 |
| Converted | 0/0 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 0% | 67% |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Pole hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. The Pole quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point. Jahn broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Jeremy conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Michalski | |||
| Q1 Cervantes |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 4-6 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | 0% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | 0% | % | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
| Jahn | |||
| Q1 Gerch |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 67-48 | 67-48 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 31/52 | 31/52 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 23/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/21 | 15/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWLLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Pedro SousaSousa – Vit KoprivaKopriva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miljan ZekicZekic – Gianluca MagerMager (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Carlos TabernerTaberner (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao DominguesDomingues – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Francesco PassaroPassaro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – Gastao EliasElias (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duarte ValeVale – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Remy BertolaBertola – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Jeremy JahnJahn (0-0) – H2H and prediction
