Emilio Gomez and Nick Chappell will face off in the quarter of the Columbus 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 1:30 pm on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Gomez who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Gomez is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Gomez -> 1.22
Nick Chappell -> 4.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Gomez vs. Nick Chappell
There is no head to head record between Emilio Gomez and Nick Chappell since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Emilio Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-28 | 8-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-26 | 38-15 | 1-3 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-33 | 25-15 | 9-11 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 114, Emilio reached the quarter after beating Robert Cash 6-3 6-2 and Tennys Sandgren 3-6 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round against Sandgren, The Ecuadorian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-2). During the match, Gomez scored 89 points vs Sandgren’s 82. Gomez was pretty aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gomez struck 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Emilio Gomez lost the serve once and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Gomez put 67% of his first serves in, winning 73% (44/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (15/30) on the 2nd serve. The Ecuadorian broke Sandgren 3 times after converting 23% of his break points (3/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gomez has conceded 1 set in this competition to win 55% of the points he played.
Gomez has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (344-242). 5-4 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gomez has a composed 26-25 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The Ecuadorian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Salinas Challenger,the Malaga Challenger,the Winnipeg Challenger and the Lexington Challenger.
The Ecuadorian has a compiled 37-19 win-loss record in 2022, 5-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus 2 Challenger
Nick Chappell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-25 | 19-17 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-36 | 38-25 | 2-4 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-33 | 14-16 | 7-8 | 2-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-35 | 14-16 | 4-12 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-16 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 451, the American got to the quarter after beating Alexis Galarneau 1-6 6-1 6-3 and Enzo Couacaud 6-4 6-71 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Chappell defeated Couacaud (6-4 6-71 6-4).During the match Chappell scored less points (2) than Couacaud. In fact, the world no. 114 won 109 points vs Couacaud’s. That means that Chappell was more focused during the important points. Chappell was pretty aggressive to blast 46 winners.
About the serving games, Chappell made 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Nick Chappell lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Chappell put 63% of his first serves in, winning 71% (46/65) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (15/38) on the 2nd serve. Nick broke Couacaud 6 times after converting 38% of his break points (6/16).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Chappell has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 50% of the points he played.
The American’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Cancun.
Nick has a composed 20-26 win-loss record in 2022, 2-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gomez | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 43 | 56 |
| Pts | 155-127 | 183-180 |
| Total Points | 282 | 363 |
| Winners | 62 | 73 |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% |
Both Gomez and Chappell played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Emilio Gomez surrendered 1 set, while Nick Chappell dropped 2 sets. Gomez has played 1 set(s) less than Chappell (5 vs 6). Therefore, Gomez played 13 games less than Chappell. Gomez scored 62 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Chappell scored 73 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gomez | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| 1st in | 86/135 | 105/169 |
| %1st in | 64% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 62/86 | 73/105 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 27/49 | 28/64 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 44% |
Gomez made 7 aces (3.5 per match). Chappell bagged 9 aces (4.5 per match). Gomez won 72% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Chappell won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gomez | Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 11 |
| Converted | 8/24 | 11/28 |
| % Converted | 33% | 39% |
| Conceded | 14 | 14 |
| Saved | 11 | 7 |
| % Saved | 79% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 7 |
Gomez broke his opponents 8 times with a 33% conversion rate. Emilio conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 11 times with a 39% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gomez | ||||
| R1 Cash |
R2 Sandgren |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 26 | 43 | |
| pts | 66-45 | 89-82 | 155-127 | |
| Total points | 111 | 171 | 282 | |
| Winners | 18 | 44 | 62 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 49% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 26/45 | 60/90 | 86/135 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 67% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 18/26 | 44/60 | 62/86 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 73% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 15/30 | 27/49 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 50% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 3/13 | 8/24 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 23% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 12 | 14 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 11/12 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 92% | 46% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Chappell | ||||
| R1 Galarneau |
R2 Couacaud |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-1 6-3 | 6-4 6-71 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 33 | 56 | |
| pts | 74-69 | 109-111 | 183-180 | |
| Total points | 143 | 220 | 363 | |
| Winners | 27 | 46 | 73 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 42% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 40/66 | 65/103 | 105/169 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 63% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 27/40 | 46/65 | 73/105 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 71% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/26 | 15/38 | 28/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 39% | 44% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 6/16 | 11/28 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 38% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | 14 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 3/7 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 43% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLLWWLW
WWWLLWWWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nick ChappellChappell – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
