Emilio Gomez and Tennys Sandgren will play each other in the 2nd round of the Columbus 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Gomez who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Gomez is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Gomez -> 1.32
Tennys Sandgren -> 3.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Gomez vs. Tennys Sandgren
There is no head to head record between Emilio Gomez and Tennys Sandgren since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Emilio Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-28 | 8-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-26 | 38-15 | 1-3 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-33 | 25-15 | 9-11 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 114, the Ecuadorian reached the 2nd round after defeating Robert Cash 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Gomez had a good straight sets win against Cash (6-3 6-2). During the match, Gomez scored 66 points vs Cash’s 45. Gomez was extremely aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gomez struck 4 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Emilio Gomez lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Gomez put 58% of his first serves in, winning 69% (18/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the 2nd serve. Gomez broke Cash 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Gomez has positive record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (343-242). 4-4 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gomez has a composed 25-25 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The Ecuadorian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Salinas Challenger,the Malaga Challenger,the Winnipeg Challenger and the Lexington Challenger.
Emilio has a composed 36-19 win-loss record in 2022, 4-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus 2 Challenger
Tennys Sandgren
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-9 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 20-19 | 0-1 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-23 | 19-11 | 1-5 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-24 | 5-12 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-13 | 7-5 | 5-3 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 409, Sandgren reached the 2nd round after defeating Omni Kumar 7-5 6-2.
In the 1st round, Sandgren had a good straight sets win against Kumar (7-5 6-2). During the match Sandgren scored 73 points vs Kumar’s 50. Tennys was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Sandgren bagged 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Tennys Sandgren was very efficient on serve to win 85% (33/39) of his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Tennys broke Kumar 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Tennys has an aggregate 10-15 win-loss record in 2022, 2-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gomez | Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 20 |
| Pts | 66-45 | 73-50 |
| Total Points | 111 | 123 |
| Winners | 18 | 33 |
| %Winners | 27% | 45% |
Both Gomez and Sandgren played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gomez and Sandgren have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gomez played 3 games less than Sandgren. Emilio scored 18 winners (27% of the total points). On the other side, Tennys bagged 33 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gomez | Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 10 |
| 1st in | 26/45 | 39/61 |
| %1st in | 58% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 18/26 | 33/39 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 13/22 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 59% |
Gomez made 4 aces . Sandgren made 10 aces . Gomez won 69% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Sandgren won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gomez | Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 45% | 50% |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Gomez broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Emilio conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Sandgren broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 6 break points.
| Gomez | |||
| R1 Cash |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 66-45 | 66-45 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 27% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 26/45 | 26/45 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 18/26 | 18/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Sandgren | |||
| R1 Kumar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 73-50 | 73-50 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 39/61 | 39/61 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 33/39 | 33/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 6/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLLWWLW
LWLWLWWWLW Tennis Scores in Columbus 2 Challenger
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Paul JubbJubb (7-64 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Justin BoulaisBoulais (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dominic Stephan StrickerStephan Stricker – Benjamin LockLock (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (7-5 3-6 7-62) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Nick ChappellChappell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Aidan MchughMchugh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
