Nerman Fatic and Louis Wessels will play each other in the 2nd round of the Sibiu Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on COURT 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nerman Fatic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nerman Fatic is the pick to win this match.
Nerman Fatic -> 1.51
Louis Wessels -> 2.49
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nerman Fatic vs. Louis Wessels
This will be the 3rd time that Nerman Fatic and Louis Wessels square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Fatic (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Fatic won 6-1 6-2 in the 2nd round in M25 Santa Margherita Di Pula back in 2019.
Nerman Fatic
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-26 | 3-5 | 19-20 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-28 | 0-1 | 35-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2022 | 34-27 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2021 | 37-26 | 1-1 | 30-22 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 11-3 | 0-0 | 9-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 258, Nerman reached the 2nd round after defeating Riccardo Bonadio 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, Nerman had a good straight sets win against Bonadio (6-3 6-3). During the match, Fatic scored 78 points vs Bonadio’s 63. The Bosnian was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Fatic fired 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Nerman Fatic was very effective on serve to win 74% (29/39) of his 1st serve and 55% (12/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Bosnian broke Bonadio 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Fatic has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (266-184). 24-17 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Fatic has an overall219-139 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Bosnian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Antalya.
Nerman has a composed 24-21 win-loss record in 2022, 24-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sibiu Challenger
Fatic has never competed in this tournament before.
Louis Wessels
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 29-29 | 6-3 | 20-19 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
2023 | 37-36 | 4-4 | 26-18 | 3-10 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
2022 | 46-34 | 7-4 | 39-27 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 32-19 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2020 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 267 (career-high), Wessels got to the 2nd round after defeating Mattia Bellucci 4-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against Bellucci, Wessels recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-4).During the match Wessels scored less points (5) than Bellucci. In fact, the world no. 258 won 98 points vs Bellucci’s. That means that Wessels was more focused during the important points. Louis was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Wessels scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was not very solid on his 2nd serve to score 12 double faults. Louis Wessels lost the serve 4 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Wessels put 54% of his first serves in, winning 60% (39/65) of the points behind his 1st serve and 51% (28/55) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Bellucci 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Louis’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Kalmar and M25 Poprad.
Wessels has an aggregate 35-25 win-loss record in 2022, 34-22 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Fatic | Wessels |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 18 | 29 |
Pts | 78-63 | 98-103 |
Total Points | 141 | 201 |
Winners | 29 | 39 |
%Winners | 37% | 40% |
Both Fatic and Wessels played 1 match. At the moment, Louis Wessels conceded 1 set while Nerman Fatic hasn’t dropped a set so far. Fatic has played 1 set(s) less than Wessels (2 vs 3). Therefore, Fatic played 11 games less than Wessels. The Bosnian scored 29 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The German fired 39 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Fatic | Wessels |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 1 |
Avg per match | 3 | 1 |
1st in | 39/61 | 65/120 |
%1st in | 64% | 54% |
1st pts | 29/39 | 39/65 |
%1st pts | 74% | 60% |
2nd pts | 12/22 | 28/55 |
%2nd pts | 55% | 51% |
Fatic managed to score 3 aces . Wessels struck 1 ace . Fatic won 74% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Wessels won 60% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Fatic | Wessels |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 5 |
Converted | 4/14 | 5/11 |
% Converted | 29% | 45% |
Conceded | 6 | 14 |
Saved | 5 | 10 |
% Saved | 83% | 71% |
Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Nerman broke his opponent 4 times with a 29% conversion rate. Nerman conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Louis broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Wessels conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
Fatic | |||
R1 Bonadio |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 78-63 | 78-63 | |
Total points | 141 | 141 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 39/61 | 39/61 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 29/39 | 29/39 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 12/22 | 12/22 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/14 | 4/14 | |
Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Wessels | |||
R1 Bellucci |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
pts | 98-103 | 98-103 | |
Total points | 201 | 201 | |
Winners | 39 | 39 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 12 | 12 | |
1st in | 65/120 | 65/120 | |
% 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
1st pts | 39/65 | 39/65 | |
% 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
2nd pts | 28/55 | 28/55 | |
% 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
Conceded | 14 | 14 | |
Saved | 10/14 | 10 | |
Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Sibiu Challenger
- Lukas KleinKlein – Vlad Victor CorneaVictor Cornea (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Dragos DimaDima (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (6-75 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Johan NiklesNikles – Kai WehneltWehnelt (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Billy HarrisHarris (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Steven DiezDiez – Mirza BasicBasic (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Marius CopilCopil (7-63 7-64) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-3 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Filip HoranskyHoransky (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Dragos Nicolae MadarasNicolae Madaras (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko (2-6 6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (7-5 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Louis WesselsWessels – Mattia BellucciBellucci (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Marius CopilCopil (7-6(3) 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Dragos Nicolae MadarasNicolae Madaras (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Filip HoranskyHoransky (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Johan NiklesNikles – Kai WehneltWehnelt (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Vlad Victor CorneaVictor Cornea (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Dragos DimaDima (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko (2-6 6-1 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Billy HarrisHarris (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-3 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Johan NiklesNikles (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Steven DiezDiez (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Giovanni FonioFonio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Louis WesselsWessels – Nerman FaticFatic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (1-0) – H2H and prediction