Federico Coria and Steven Diez will face off in the 2nd round of the Sibiu Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Federico Coria who should win in 2 sets.
Federico Coria -> 1.26
Steven Diez -> 3.7
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Federico Coria vs. Steven Diez
This will be the 3rd time that Federico Coria and Steven Diez clash against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Coria and Diez (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they played, Coria won 6-4 6-2 in the qualifications in Rome back in 2020.
Federico Coria
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 20-18 | 0-1 | 20-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 45-35 | 0-3 | 45-31 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-29 | 3-8 | 35-20 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-32 | 2-5 | 39-26 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-31 | 2-7 | 40-20 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 71, Federico got to the 2nd round after defeating Ramkumar Ramanathan 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, Coria had a good straight sets win against Ramanathan (6-2 6-1). During the match, Coria scored 53 points vs Ramanathan’s 23. The Argentine was very aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Talking about the service games, Coria scored just 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 1 double fault. Federico Coria lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Coria put 61% of his first serves in, winning 73% (16/22) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (7/14) on the 2nd serve. Federico broke Ramanathan 7 times after converting 78% of his break points (7/9).
Coria has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (455-273). 25-20 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Coria has an overall 442-237 record in the last years on clay.
Federico’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Milan Challenger.
Federico has an aggregate 27-26 win-loss record in 2022, 25-20 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sibiu Challenger
Steven Diez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 11-11 | 7-3 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 18-22 | 14-11 | 0-3 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-36 | 7-13 | 16-19 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-32 | 13-12 | 22-19 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-28 | 3-6 | 12-16 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 398, Steven reached the 2nd round after beating Davide Galoppini 6-2 6-0, Maks Kasnikowski 5-7 7-5 6-3 and Mirza Basic 6-1 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Canadian had a good straight sets win against Basic (6-1 6-3). During the match Diez scored 64 points vs Basic’s 43. Steven was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Diez made 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Steven Diez was very efficient on serve to win 78% (29/37) of his 1st serve and 58% (7/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Steven broke Basic 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Steven’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Sierre and Bigorre.
The Canadian has an aggregate 25-26 win-loss record in 2022, 14-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Coria | Diez |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 63 |
| Pts | 53-23 | 233-168 |
| Total Points | 76 | 401 |
| Winners | 16 | 102 |
| %Winners | 30% | 44% |
Coria played 1 match while Diez competed in 3 matches. Diez started his run from the qualifications while Coria had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Steven Diez lost 1 set while Federico Coria hasn’t conceded a set so far. Coria has played 5 set(s) less than Diez (2 vs 7). Therefore, Coria played 48 games less than Diez. The Argentine scored 16 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, Diez bagged 102 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Coria | Diez |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 22/36 | 139/192 |
| %1st in | 61% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 16/22 | 102/139 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 7/14 | 31/53 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 58% |
Coria bagged 1 ace . Diez also bagged 7 aces (2.3 per match). Coria won 73% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Diez won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Coria | Diez |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 14 |
| Converted | 7/9 | 14/32 |
| % Converted | 78% | 44% |
| Conceded | 4 | 14 |
| Saved | 2 | 11 |
| % Saved | 50% | 79% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Coria broke his opponent 7 times with a 78% conversion rate. Coria lost his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Diez broke his opponents 14 times with a 44% conversion rate. Diez conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
| Coria | |||
| R1 Ramanathan | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 53-23 | 53-23 | |
| Total points | 76 | 76 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 22/36 | 22/36 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 16/22 | 16/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/14 | 7/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/9 | 7/9 | |
| Converted % | 78% | 78% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Diez | |||||
| Q1 Galoppini | Q3 Kasnikowski | R1 Basic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | 5-7 7-5 6-3 | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 33 | 16 | 63 | |
| pts | 55-23 | 114-102 | 64-43 | 233-168 | |
| Total points | 78 | 216 | 107 | 401 | |
| Winners | 26 | 47 | 29 | 102 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 41% | 45% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 34/42 | 68/101 | 37/49 | 139/192 | |
| % 1st in | 81% | 67% | 76% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 26/34 | 47/68 | 29/37 | 102/139 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 69% | 78% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/8 | 19/33 | 7/12 | 31/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 58% | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/15 | 4/10 | 14/32 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 33% | 40% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 10 | 3 | 14 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 7/10 | 3/3 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 70% | 100% | 270% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Sibiu Challenger
- Lukas KleinKlein – Vlad Victor CorneaVictor Cornea (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Dragos DimaDima (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (6-75 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Johan NiklesNikles – Kai WehneltWehnelt (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Billy HarrisHarris (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Steven DiezDiez – Mirza BasicBasic (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Marius CopilCopil (7-63 7-64) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-3 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Filip HoranskyHoransky (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Dragos Nicolae MadarasNicolae Madaras (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko (2-6 6-1 7-63) – See score progression
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (7-5 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Louis WesselsWessels – Mattia BellucciBellucci (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Marius CopilCopil (7-6(3) 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Dragos Nicolae MadarasNicolae Madaras (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Filip HoranskyHoransky (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Johan NiklesNikles – Kai WehneltWehnelt (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Vlad Victor CorneaVictor Cornea (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Dragos DimaDima (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko (2-6 6-1 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Billy HarrisHarris (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-3 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Johan NiklesNikles (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Steven DiezDiez (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Giovanni FonioFonio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Louis WesselsWessels – Nerman FaticFatic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (1-0) – H2H and prediction