Donald Young and Patrick Kypson will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Columbus 2 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 3:00 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Kypson who should win in 3 sets.
Patrick Kypson -> 1.727
Donald Young -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Donald Young vs. Patrick Kypson
This will be the 2nd time that Donald Young and Patrick Kypson square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Young (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Young won 6-3 6-2 in the 1st round in the Newport Beach Challenger back in 2019.
Donald Young
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 4-13 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 19-20 | 11-12 | 2-3 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 10-15 | 5-9 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 4-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2019 | 26-28 | 23-22 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 639, the American got to the qualifications after beating Preston Brown 6-4 5-7 7-5.
In the qualifications, The American defeated Brown (6-4 5-7 7-5). During the match, Young scored 95 points vs Brown’s 87. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Young blasted 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Donald Young was pretty effective on serve to win 82% (37/45) of his 1st serve and 70% (26/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Donald broke Brown 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Young has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (227-212). 4-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Young has an aggregate 35-30 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Young has an overall 11-15 win-loss record in 2022, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus 2 Challenger
Patrick Kypson
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 17-20 | 6-9 | 4-7 | 5-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 14-9 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 679, will start his run in the Columbus 2 Challenger after he played his last match in the Columbus 2 Challenger where he beat 6-3 6-3 to Kiur in the qualifications on the 18th of September.
Patrick has an aggregate 13-8 win-loss record in 2022, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Kypson’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Champaign and M25 Edwardsville.
In terms of his career, Kypson has an overall 126-71 record. He has a flat 7-7 record on indoor hard courts.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Young | Kypson |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 34 | 18 |
Pts | 95-87 | 61-44 |
Total Points | 182 | 105 |
Winners | 37 | 22 |
%Winners | 39% | 36% |
Both Young and Kypson played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Donald Young surrendered 1 set while Patrick Kypson hasn’t conceded a set so far. Young has played 1 set more than Kypson (3 vs 2). Therefore, Young played 16 games more than Kypson. Donald scored 37 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Kypson blasted 22 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Young | Kypson |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 6 |
Avg per match | 9 | 6 |
1st in | 45/82 | 28/51 |
%1st in | 55% | 55% |
1st pts | 37/45 | 22/28 |
%1st pts | 82% | 79% |
2nd pts | 26/37 | 14/23 |
%2nd pts | 70% | 61% |
Young made 9 aces . Kypson made 6 aces . Young won 82% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, Kypson won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Young | Kypson |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/7 | 4/5 |
% Converted | 43% | 80% |
Conceded | 2 | 3 |
Saved | 0 | 2 |
% Saved | 0% | 67% |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Donald broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Young conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Young | |||
Q1 Brown | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 5-7 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
pts | 95-87 | 95-87 | |
Total points | 182 | 182 | |
Winners | 37 | 37 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 45/82 | 45/82 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
1st pts | 37/45 | 37/45 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 26/37 | 26/37 | |
% 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Kypson | |||
Total | |||
---|---|---|---|
Score | |||
Tot Set | 0 | ||
Tot Games | 0 | ||
pts | 0-0 | ||
Total points | 0 | ||
Winners | 0 | ||
%Winners | 0% | ||
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | ||
Double Faults | 0 | ||
1st in | 0/0 | ||
% 1st in | 0% | ||
1st pts | 0/0 | ||
% 1st pts | 0% | ||
2nd pts | 0/0 | ||
% 2nd pts | 0% | ||
Breaks | |||
Won | 0 | ||
Converted | 0/0 | ||
Converted % | 0% | ||
Conceded | 0 | ||
Saved | 0 | ||
Saved % | 0% | ||
Times Broken | 0 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Donald YoungYoung – Patrick KypsonKypson (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Evan ZhuZhu (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – Roy SmithSmith (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Daniel CoxCox (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco FerrariFerrari – Taha BaadiBaadi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nathan PonwithPonwith – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Justin BoulaisBoulais – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robert CashCash – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (0-0) – H2H and prediction