Robert Cash and Daniil Glinka will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Columbus 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Robert Cash who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Robert Cash is the pick to win this match.
Robert Cash -> 1.727
Daniil Glinka -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Robert Cash vs. Daniil Glinka
There is no head to head record between Robert Cash and Daniil Glinka since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Robert Cash
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the American got to the qualifications after defeating John Mcnally 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Cash had a good straight sets win against Mcnally (6-4 6-4). During the match, Cash scored 56 points vs Mcnally’s 49. The American was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Cash bagged 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Robert Cash was pretty efficient on serve to win 83% (29/35) of his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Cash was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Mcnally twice.
Cash has a fantastic record in the last 4 years having won 75% of his matches (3-1). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Cash has an aggregate3-1 record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Cash has a composed 1-0 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Columbus 2 Challenger
Cash has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniil Glinka
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-19 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-11 | 10-8 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 769 (career-high), Daniil reached the qualifications after beating Preston Stearns 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, Glinka had a good straight sets win against Stearns (7-5 6-3). During the match Glinka scored 73 points vs Stearns’s 59. Glinka was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Glinka recorded 12 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Daniil Glinka lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Glinka put 50% of his first serves in, winning 70% (23/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (20/33) on the 2nd serve. Daniil broke Stearns 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
The Estonian’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Vaasa.
Daniil has a composed 22-25 win-loss record in 2022, 4-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cash | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 21 |
| Pts | 56-49 | 73-59 |
| Total Points | 105 | 132 |
| Winners | 29 | 23 |
| %Winners | 52% | 32% |
Both Cash and Glinka played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Cash and Glinka have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Cash played 1 game less than Glinka. Robert scored 29 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Glinka made 23 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cash | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 12 |
| 1st in | 35/53 | 33/66 |
| %1st in | 66% | 50% |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 23/33 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 20/33 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 61% |
Cash recorded 8 aces . Glinka made 12 aces . Cash won 83% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Glinka won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cash | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/2 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 100% | 40% |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The American broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 2 break points. The Estonian broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Estonian conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cash | |||
| Q1 Mcnally |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 56-49 | 56-49 | |
| Total points | 105 | 105 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 35/53 | 35/53 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 29/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 12/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Glinka | |||
| Q1 Stearns |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 73-59 | 73-59 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 33/66 | 33/66 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 23/33 | 23/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/33 | 20/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWLWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Donald YoungYoung – Patrick KypsonKypson (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Evan ZhuZhu (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – Roy SmithSmith (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Daniel CoxCox (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco FerrariFerrari – Taha BaadiBaadi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nathan PonwithPonwith – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Justin BoulaisBoulais – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robert CashCash – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
