Georgii Kravchenko and Sebastian Gima will play each other in the qualifications of the Sibiu Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:30 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Georgii Kravchenko who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Georgii Kravchenko is the pick to win this match.
Georgii Kravchenko -> 1.7
Sebastian Gima -> 2.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Georgii Kravchenko vs. Sebastian Gima
There is no head to head record between Georgii Kravchenko and Sebastian Gima since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Georgii Kravchenko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-6 | 8-4 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-30 | 8-9 | 30-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-28 | 3-2 | 24-22 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 46-30 | 2-2 | 38-25 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 27-11 | 5-3 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 434, Georgii got to the qualifications after defeating Vlad Andrei Dumitru 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications, Georgii had a good straight sets win against Andrei Dumitru (6-0 6-1). During the match, Kravchenko scored 50 points vs Andrei Dumitru’s 26. Georgii was very aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kravchenko scored just 1 ace during the match and he committed only 3 double faults. Georgii Kravchenko was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 76% (16/21) of his 1st serve and 57% (8/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Ukrainian broke Andrei Dumitru 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Kravchenko has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 61% of his matches (184-117). 19-18 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kravchenko has a compiled140-85 match record in the last 5 years on clay.
Kravchenko’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Bytom.
Georgii has an overall 25-24 win-loss record in 2022, 19-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sibiu Challenger
Kravchenko has never competed in this tournament before.
Sebastian Gima
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-20 | 0-2 | 23-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 57-35 | 15-8 | 41-25 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-30 | 25-11 | 23-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-24 | 1-3 | 28-20 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-9 | 7-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 620, Gima got to the qualifications after beating Remy Bertola 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Gima had a good straight sets win against Bertola (6-2 6-1). During the match Gima scored 61 points vs Bertola’s 44. The Romanian was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Gima wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Sebastian Gima lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Gima put 67% of his first serves in, winning 67% (22/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (8/16) on the 2nd serve. Gima broke Bertola 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Gima’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir.
Sebastian has a composed 35-24 win-loss record in 2022, 23-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sibiu Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kravchenko | Gima |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 15 |
| Pts | 50-26 | 61-44 |
| Total Points | 76 | 105 |
| Winners | 16 | 22 |
| %Winners | 32% | 36% |
Both Kravchenko and Gima played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Kravchenko and Gima have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Kravchenko played 2 games less than Gima. The Ukrainian scored 16 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Gima fired 22 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kravchenko | Gima |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 21/35 | 33/49 |
| %1st in | 60% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 16/21 | 22/33 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 8/16 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 50% |
Kravchenko made 1 ace . Gima didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Kravchenko won 76% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Gima won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kravchenko | Gima |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 6 |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/8 |
| % Converted | 60% | 75% |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Georgii broke his opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. Georgii very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Romanian broke his opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Sebastian conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kravchenko | |||
| Q1 Andrei Dumitru |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 50-26 | 50-26 | |
| Total points | 76 | 76 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 21/35 | 21/35 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 16/21 | 16/21 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Gima | |||
| Q1 Bertola |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 61-44 | 61-44 | |
| Total points | 105 | 105 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 33/49 | 33/49 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 22/33 | 22/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/16 | 8/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWLLW
LWLWLLWWLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Steven DiezDiez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Filip HoranskyHoransky (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dragos DimaDima – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vlad Victor CorneaVictor Cornea – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Stefan PalosiPalosi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kai WehneltWehnelt – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Eric VanshelboimVanshelboim (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Louis WesselsWessels – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Marius CopilCopil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Alexander ErlerErler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko – Sebastian GimaGima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
