Giovanni Fonio and Eric Vanshelboim will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Sibiu Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:00 pm on COURT 5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Giovanni Fonio who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Giovanni Fonio is the pick to win this match.
Giovanni Fonio -> 1.27
Eric Vanshelboim -> 3.48
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Giovanni Fonio vs. Eric Vanshelboim
There is no head to head record between Giovanni Fonio and Eric Vanshelboim since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Giovanni Fonio
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-29 | 9-7 | 24-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-39 | 22-12 | 28-26 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-29 | 0-0 | 40-28 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-22 | 0-0 | 40-20 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-7 | 8-3 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 371 (career-high), the Italian got to the qualifications after beating Vlad Andrei Dancu 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Andrei Dancu (6-2 6-3). During the match, Fonio scored 62 points vs Andrei Dancu’s 39. Fonio was exceptionally aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Fonio scored 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Giovanni Fonio lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Fonio put 66% of his first serves in, winning 67% (18/27) of the points behind his 1st serve and 71% (10/14) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Andrei Dancu 6 times after converting 43% of his break points (6/14).
Fonio has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 60% of his matches (208-141). 34-24 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Fonio has a compiled167-111 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
The Italian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Antalya.
Giovanni has an overall 34-25 win-loss record in 2022, 34-24 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sibiu Challenger
The Italian has never competed in this tournament before.
Eric Vanshelboim
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36-27 | 11-7 | 25-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-25 | 6-2 | 50-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-24 | 4-5 | 39-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 42-20 | 12-4 | 26-13 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-11 | 4-4 | 14-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 488, the Ukrainian got to the qualifications after beating Mihai Razvan Marinescu 6-0 7-63.
In the qualifications, Vanshelboim had a good straight sets win against Razvan Marinescu (6-0 7-63). During the match Vanshelboim scored 76 points vs Razvan Marinescu’s 59. Eric was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Vanshelboim couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Eric Vanshelboim lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Vanshelboim put 68% of his first serves in, winning 65% (32/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the 2nd serve. Vanshelboim broke Razvan Marinescu 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Vanshelboim’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Shymkent and M15 Colombo.
Eric has an overall 38-19 win-loss record in 2022, 36-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fonio | Vanshelboim |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 19 |
| Pts | 62-39 | 76-59 |
| Total Points | 101 | 135 |
| Winners | 18 | 32 |
| %Winners | 29% | 42% |
Both Fonio and Vanshelboim played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Fonio and Vanshelboim have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Fonio played 2 games less than Vanshelboim. The Italian scored 18 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Vanshelboim managed to score 32 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fonio | Vanshelboim |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 0 |
| 1st in | 27/41 | 49/72 |
| %1st in | 66% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 18/27 | 32/49 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 13/23 |
| %2nd pts | 71% | 57% |
Fonio blasted 2 aces . Vanshelboim didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Fonio won 67% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Vanshelboim won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fonio | Vanshelboim |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/14 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 43% | 40% |
| Conceded | 2 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 7 |
| % Saved | 0% | 88% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Giovanni broke his opponent 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. Giovanni dropped his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Ukrainian broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Eric conceded his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fonio | |||
| Q1 Andrei |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 62-39 | 62-39 | |
| Total points | 101 | 101 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 27/41 | 27/41 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 18/27 | 18/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 10/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Vanshelboim | |||
| Q1 Razvan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 76-59 | 76-59 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 49/72 | 49/72 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 32/49 | 32/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLWLWWLW
LLWLWWLWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Steven DiezDiez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Filip HoranskyHoransky (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dragos DimaDima – Zdenek KolarKolar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vlad Victor CorneaVictor Cornea – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Stefan PalosiPalosi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kai WehneltWehnelt – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Eric VanshelboimVanshelboim (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Louis WesselsWessels – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Marius CopilCopil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Alexander ErlerErler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Georgii KravchenkoKravchenko – Sebastian GimaGima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
