Jordan Thompson and Michael Mmoh will clash against each other in the semifinal of the Cary Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 5:30 pm on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jordan Thompson who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jordan Thompson is the pick to win this match.
Jordan Thompson -> 1.63
Michael Mmoh -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jordan Thompson vs. Michael Mmoh
This will be the 3rd time that Jordan Thompson and Michael Mmoh square off. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Thompson won 6-2 7-6(2) in the qualifications in Cincinnati back in 2020.
Highlights Jordan Thompson vs Michael Mmoh – Cincinnati 20-August-2020
Jordan Thompson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-19 | 18-10 | 3-5 | 2-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-28 | 22-15 | 0-3 | 7-4 | 12-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-26 | 18-14 | 2-6 | 8-1 | 12-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-25 | 10-11 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 9-5 | 2-2 |
| 2020 | 12-13 | 6-6 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 102, the Australian got to the semifinal after beating Ryan Seggerman 6-3 6-2, Juncheng Shang 7-64 6-710 6-2 and Nick Chappell 6-3 6-1.
In the quarter, Thompson had a good straight sets win against Chappell (6-3 6-1). During the match, Thompson scored 61 points vs Chappell’s 39. Jordan was extremely aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Regarding the service games, Thompson recorded 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jordan Thompson was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 90% (19/21) of his 1st serve and 72% (13/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Chappell 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian has lost 1 set in this event to win 57% of the points he played.
Thompson has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (378-254). 14-12 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Thompson has an aggregate 215-140 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
The Australian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Surbiton Challenger and the Nottingham Challenger.
Thompson has an overall 30-24 win-loss record in 2022, 14-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cary Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Michael Mmoh
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-12 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-21 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-29 | 18-12 | 8-7 | 17-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-18 | 14-11 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-9 | 6-5 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 154, Mmoh reached the semifinal after defeating Daniel Cox 6-0 6-3, Alex Rybakov w/o and Yasutaka Uchiyama 6-3 3-6 6-3.
In the quarter, The American defeated Uchiyama (6-3 3-6 6-3). During the match Mmoh scored 96 points vs Uchiyama’s 81. Michael was exceptionally aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about serving, Mmoh scored 4 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Michael Mmoh lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Mmoh put 70% of his first serves in, winning 77% (44/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (12/24) on the 2nd serve. Mmoh broke Uchiyama 3 times after converting 21% of his break points (3/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mmoh has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Tallahassee Challenger.
Michael has an aggregate 27-25 win-loss record in 2022, 9-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Thompson | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 67 | 42 |
| Pts | 244-182 | 154-117 |
| Total Points | 426 | 271 |
| Winners | 103 | 68 |
| %Winners | 42% | 44% |
Thompson played 3 matches while Mmoh competed in 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Jordan Thompson surrendered 1 set, while Michael Mmoh surrendered 1 set. Thompson has played 2 sets more than Mmoh (7 vs 5). Therefore, Thompson played 25 games more than Mmoh. Thompson scored 103 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The American struck 68 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Thompson | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 23 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 7.7 | 3.5 |
| 1st in | 120/197 | 90/133 |
| %1st in | 61% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 103/120 | 68/90 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 43/77 | 24/43 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 56% |
Thompson recorded 23 aces (7.7 per match). Mmoh managed to score 7 aces (3.5 per match). Thompson won 86% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Mmoh won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Thompson | Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 7 |
| Converted | 11/26 | 7/21 |
| % Converted | 42% | 33% |
| Conceded | 7 | 9 |
| Saved | 5 | 7 |
| % Saved | 71% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Australian broke his opponents 11 times with a 42% conversion rate. Thompson lost his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Mmoh broke his opponents 7 times with a 33% conversion rate. Mmoh conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Thompson | |||||
| R1 Seggerman |
R2 Shang |
1/4 Chappell |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 7-64 6-710 6-2 | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 34 | 16 | 67 | |
| pts | 62-40 | 121-103 | 61-39 | 244-182 | |
| Total points | 102 | 224 | 100 | 426 | |
| Winners | 29 | 55 | 19 | 103 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 45% | 31% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 15 | 2 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 33/57 | 66/101 | 21/39 | 120/197 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 65% | 54% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 29/33 | 55/66 | 19/21 | 103/120 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 83% | 90% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 17/35 | 13/18 | 43/77 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 49% | 72% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 4/9 | 4/14 | 11/26 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 44% | 29% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 | 0 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 1/3 | 0/0 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 33% | – | 44% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Mmoh | |||||
| R1 Cox |
R2 Rybakov |
1/4 Uchiyama |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | w/o | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | – | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | – | 27 | 42 | |
| pts | 58-36 | – | 96-81 | 154-117 | |
| Total points | 94 | – | 177 | 271 | |
| Winners | 24 | – | 44 | 68 | |
| %Winners | 41% | – | 46% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | – | 4 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | – | 6 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 33/52 | – | 57/81 | 90/133 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | – | 70% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 24/33 | – | 44/57 | 68/90 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | – | 77% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | – | 12/24 | 24/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | – | 50% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | – | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | – | 3/14 | 7/21 | |
| Converted % | 57% | – | 21% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | – | 6 | 9 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | – | 4/6 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 67% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | – | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWLWWLWWW
LLLWWLLLLW Tennis Scores in Cary Challenger
- Nathaniel Lammons/Jack WithrowLammons/Jack Withrow – Julian Cash/Henry PattenCash/Henry Patten (1-6 7-67 10-6) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Jordan ThompsonThompson (1-1) – H2H and prediction
