Katie Swan and Nao Hibino will face off in the quarter of the Chennai Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 pm on Center Court. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nao Hibino who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nao Hibino is the pick to win this match.
Nao Hibino -> 1.82
Katie Swan -> 2.03
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Katie Swan vs. Nao Hibino
This will be the 2nd time that Katie Swan and Nao Hibino face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Swan (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Swan won 6-1 6-4 in the qualifications in New York back in 2018.
Katie Swan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-7 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-18 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 7-4 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-13 | 17-6 | 2-3 | 6-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-12 | 11-6 | 1-5 | 5-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 174, the Brit got to the quarter after beating Arianne Hartono 6-1 6-2 and Anastasia Gasanova 7-65 6-2.
In the 2nd round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Gasanova (7-65 6-2). During the match, Swan scored 79 points vs Gasanova’s 65. Katie was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Swan scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and she committed only 5 double faults. Katie Swan lost the serve 4 times. Furthermore, Swan put 62% of her first serves in, winning 56% (23/41) of the points behind her 1st serve and 44% (11/25) on the 2nd serve. Swan broke Gasanova 6 times after converting 75% of her break points (6/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Swan hasn’t dropped yet a set in this event to win 57% of the points she played.
Swan has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 62% of her matches (172-107). 16-5 on hard in 2022. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Swan has an overall123-59 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
The Brit has an aggregate 20-11 win-loss record in 2022, 16-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Chennai
Katie has never competed in this tournament before.
Nao Hibino
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-28 | 19-18 | 2-7 | 2-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-30 | 26-19 | 9-7 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 26-19 | 7-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-21 | 1-9 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-10 | 9-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 185, Nao reached the quarter after beating Sai Chamarthi 6-1 6-0, Daniela Vismane 7-5 6-0, Jana Fett 6-0 6-4 and Qiang Wang 6-2 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Nao had a good straight sets win against Wang (6-2 6-3). During the match Hibino scored 58 points vs Wang’s 36. Nao was extremely aggressive to blast 20 winners.
About the serving games, Hibino wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Nao Hibino was very effective on serve to win 80% (20/25) of her 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve twice. Nao broke Wang 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Japanese started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t dropped yet a set in this tournament to conquer 63% of the points she played.
Hibino’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the W25 Chiang Rai.
Nao has a compiled 28-21 win-loss record in 2022, 21-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Swan | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 36 | 64 |
| Pts | 147-111 | 244-141 |
| Total Points | 258 | 385 |
| Winners | 46 | 85 |
| %Winners | 31% | 35% |
Swan played 2 matches while Hibino competed in 4 matches. Hibino started her run from the qualifications while Swan had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Swan has played 4 set(s) less than Hibino (4 vs 8). Therefore, Swan played 28 games less than Hibino. The Brit scored 46 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Hibino scored 85 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Swan | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 1 |
| 1st in | 75/124 | 116/179 |
| %1st in | 60% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 46/75 | 85/116 |
| %1st pts | 61% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 24/49 | 39/63 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 62% |
Swan managed to score 2 aces (1 per match). Hibino made 4 aces (1 per match). Swan won 61% points on her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Hibino won 73% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Swan | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 22 |
| Converted | 11/18 | 22/30 |
| % Converted | 61% | 73% |
| Conceded | 13 | 10 |
| Saved | 8 | 5 |
| % Saved | 62% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
The Brit broke her opponents 11 times with a 61% conversion rate. Katie lost her serve 5 times and she saved 62% of the break points that she conceded. Nao broke her opponents 22 times with a 73% conversion rate. Hibino conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Swan | ||||
| R1 Hartono |
R2 Gasanova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | 7-65 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 21 | 36 | |
| pts | 68-46 | 79-65 | 147-111 | |
| Total points | 114 | 144 | 258 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 29% | 31% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 5 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 34/58 | 41/66 | 75/124 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 62% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 23/34 | 23/41 | 46/75 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 56% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 11/25 | 24/49 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 44% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 6/8 | 11/18 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 75% | 61% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 4 | 13 | |
| Saved | 8/9 | 0/4 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 89% | 0% | 45% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| Hibino | ||||||
| Q1 Chamarthi |
Q3 Vismane |
R1 Fett |
R2 Wang |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | 7-5 6-0 | 6-0 6-4 | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 18 | 16 | 17 | 64 | |
| pts | 60-23 | 67-47 | 59-35 | 58-36 | 244-141 | |
| Total points | 83 | 114 | 94 | 94 | 385 | |
| Winners | 13 | 27 | 25 | 20 | 85 | |
| %Winners | 22% | 40% | 42% | 34% | 35% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 16/27 | 45/62 | 30/46 | 25/44 | 116/179 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 73% | 65% | 57% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 13/16 | 27/45 | 25/30 | 20/25 | 85/116 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 60% | 83% | 80% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/11 | 11/17 | 7/16 | 10/19 | 39/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 100% | 65% | 44% | 53% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 22 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/7 | 5/6 | 5/9 | 22/30 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 86% | 83% | 56% | 73% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 10 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 4/6 | 0/1 | 1/3 | 5 | |
| Saved % | – | 67% | 0% | 33% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWLLWW
LWWLLLWWWL Tennis Scores in Chennai
- Gabriela Dabrowski/Luisa StefaniDabrowski/Luisa Stefani – Rutuja Bhosale/Karman Kaur ThandiBhosale/Karman Kaur Thandi (6-0 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Katie SwanSwan – Nao HibinoHibino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – Rebecca MarinoMarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eugenie BouchardBouchard – Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
