![Prediction And Head To Head Peter Gojowczyk Vs. Daniel Masur Jgi8hvle0o Prediction and head to head Peter Gojowczyk vs. Daniel Masur](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Peter-Gojowczyk-vs.-Daniel-Masur-JGI8hvlE0O.jpg)
Peter Gojowczyk and Daniel Masur will square off in the 2nd round of the Rennes Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on COURT LE LIBERTE. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Peter Gojowczyk who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Peter Gojowczyk is the pick to win this match.
Peter Gojowczyk -> 1.64
Daniel Masur -> 2.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Peter Gojowczyk vs. Daniel Masur
This will be the 2nd time that Peter Gojowczyk and Daniel Masur fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Gojowczyk (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played, Gojowczyk won 5-7 6-3 6-2 in the qualifications in Stuttgart back in 2017.
Peter Gojowczyk
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 29-21 | 21-12 | 5-3 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 13-25 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 33-26 | 9-4 | 3-7 | 16-12 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 5-8 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2019 | 21-35 | 9-16 | 1-6 | 8-7 | 1-5 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 172, Peter reached the 2nd round after defeating Kenny de Schepper 6-74 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round against de Schepper, Gojowczyk recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 6-3 6-2). During the match, Gojowczyk scored 91 points vs de Schepper’s 84. The German was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gojowczyk fired 5 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Peter Gojowczyk was quite efficient on serve to win 78% (40/51) of his 1st serve and 56% (27/48) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Peter was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break de Schepper 3 times.
Gojowczyk has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (260-235). 2-3 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Gojowczyk has an overall 82-53 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The German has an aggregate 11-21 win-loss record in 2022, 2-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rennes Challenger
Gojowczyk has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Masur
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 36-12 | 1-2 | 6-3 | 16-4 | 1-2 | 12-1 |
2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
2020 | 15-14 | 3-2 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
Ranked no. 184, Daniel got to the 2nd round after defeating Joris De Loore 6-79 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round against De Loore, Masur recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-79 6-2 6-4). During the match Masur scored 102 points vs De Loore’s 90. Masur was extremely aggressive to blast 57 winners.
About the serving games, Masur recorded 6 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Daniel Masur lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Masur put 76% of his first serves in, winning 77% (57/74) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. Daniel broke De Loore 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Daniel’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Trimbach,the Todi Challenger and the Pozoblanco Challenger.
Daniel has a composed 24-23 win-loss record in 2022, 4-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Gojowczyk | Masur |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
Tot Games | 30 | 31 |
Pts | 91-84 | 102-90 |
Total Points | 175 | 192 |
Winners | 40 | 57 |
%Winners | 44% | 56% |
Both Gojowczyk and Masur played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Peter Gojowczyk surrendered 1 set, while Daniel Masur lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Gojowczyk and Masur have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Gojowczyk played 1 game less than Masur. The German scored 40 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The German recorded 57 winners (56%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Gojowczyk | Masur |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 6 |
Avg per match | 5 | 6 |
1st in | 51/99 | 74/98 |
%1st in | 52% | 76% |
1st pts | 40/51 | 57/74 |
%1st pts | 78% | 77% |
2nd pts | 27/48 | 11/24 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 46% |
Gojowczyk struck 5 aces . Masur struck 6 aces . Gojowczyk won 78% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Gojowczyk | Masur |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/3 | 4/5 |
% Converted | 100% | 80% |
Conceded | 3 | 6 |
Saved | 3 | 5 |
% Saved | 100% | 83% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The German broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. Peter had a solid display on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 3 break points. Masur broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Daniel conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
Gojowczyk | |||
R1 de Schepper |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-74 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 91-84 | 91-84 | |
Total points | 175 | 175 | |
Winners | 40 | 40 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
1st in | 51/99 | 51/99 | |
% 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
1st pts | 40/51 | 40/51 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 27/48 | 27/48 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Masur | |||
R1 De Loore |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-79 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
pts | 102-90 | 102-90 | |
Total points | 192 | 192 | |
Winners | 57 | 57 | |
%Winners | 56% | 56% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 74/98 | 74/98 | |
% 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
1st pts | 57/74 | 57/74 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 11/24 | 11/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Rennes Challenger
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Antoine BellierBellier (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hugo GastonGaston – Gabriel DebruDebru (6-2 4-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Clement ChidekhChidekh (7-5 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dominic ThiemThiem – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Evan FurnessFurness (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Ugo HumbertHumbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur ReymondReymond – Maxime MoraMora (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – Benoit PairePaire (0-0) – H2H and prediction