Juan Pablo Ficovich and Tennys Sandgren will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Cary Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 5:30 pm on STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tennys Sandgren who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tennys Sandgren is the pick to win this match.
Tennys Sandgren -> 1.65
Juan Pablo Ficovich -> 2.18
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Juan Pablo Ficovich vs. Tennys Sandgren
There is no head to head record between Juan Pablo Ficovich and Tennys Sandgren since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Juan Pablo Ficovich
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-26 | 4-6 | 31-18 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-33 | 15-13 | 11-18 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-32 | 6-11 | 23-15 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-16 | 2-3 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-19 | 4-3 | 13-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 126, the Argentine reached the 2nd round after beating Martin Damm 6-3 7-64.
In the 1st round, Pablo Ficovich had a good straight sets win against Damm (6-3 7-64). During the match, Pablo Ficovich scored 70 points vs Damm’s 60. Juan was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Pablo Ficovich recorded 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Juan Pablo Ficovich was very effective on serve to win 77% (30/39) of his 1st serve and 60% (15/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Pablo Ficovich broke Damm twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Pablo Ficovich has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (301-211). 3-6 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Pablo Ficovich has an overall15-19 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
Juan’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Aguascalientes Challenger and the Bogota Challenger.
Juan has an aggregate 28-22 win-loss record in 2022, 3-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cary Challenger
Juan has never competed in this tournament before.
Tennys Sandgren
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-9 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 20-19 | 0-1 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-23 | 19-11 | 1-5 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-24 | 5-12 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-13 | 7-5 | 5-3 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 446, Tennys reached the 2nd round after beating Aidan Mchugh 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Sandgren had a good straight sets win against Mchugh (6-4 6-2). During the match Sandgren scored 65 points vs Mchugh’s 44. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Sandgren scored 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Tennys Sandgren lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Sandgren put 63% of his first serves in, winning 81% (29/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (9/21) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Mchugh 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
The American has a composed 8-14 win-loss record in 2022, 6-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pablo Ficovich | Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 18 |
| Pts | 70-60 | 65-44 |
| Total Points | 130 | 109 |
| Winners | 30 | 29 |
| %Winners | 43% | 45% |
Both Pablo Ficovich and Sandgren played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Pablo Ficovich and Sandgren have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Pablo Ficovich played 4 games more than Sandgren. Pablo Ficovich scored 30 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Sandgren bagged 29 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pablo Ficovich | Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 8 |
| 1st in | 39/64 | 36/57 |
| %1st in | 61% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 29/36 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 9/21 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 43% |
Pablo Ficovich bagged 6 aces . Sandgren struck 8 aces . Pablo Ficovich won 77% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Sandgren won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pablo Ficovich | Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 5 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 50% | 63% |
| Conceded | 1 | 3 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Pablo Ficovich broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Juan lost his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Sandgren broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Sandgren conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Pablo Ficovich | |||
| R1 Damm |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 70-60 | 70-60 | |
| Total points | 130 | 130 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 39/64 | 39/64 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 30/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 15/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Sandgren | |||
| R1 Mchugh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 65-44 | 65-44 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 36/57 | 36/57 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 29/36 | 29/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | 9/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWLWLW
LWLWLWWWLW Tennis Scores in Cary Challenger
- Facundo MenaMena – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (2-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Aleksandar VukicVukic (7-64 7-63) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (0-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Braden ShickShick (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Henry PattenPatten (7-5 7-68) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Donald YoungYoung (4-6 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Nick ChappellChappell – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Keegan SmithSmith – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 7-62) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Govind NandaNanda – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Daniel CoxCox (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Martin DammDamm (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (0-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Braden ShickShick (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Donald YoungYoung (4-6 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Aleksandar VukicVukic (7-6(4) 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Henry PattenPatten (7-5 7-6(8)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ryan HarrisonHarrison – Nick ChappellChappell (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Stefan KozlovKozlov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Alex RybakovRybakov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Facundo MenaMena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
