Qiang Wang and Nao Hibino will face off in the 2nd round of the Chennai Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 5:00 pm on Court 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Qiang Wang who should win in 2 sets.
Qiang Wang -> 1.4
Nao Hibino -> 2.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Qiang Wang vs. Nao Hibino
This will be the 3rd time that Qiang Wang and Nao Hibino face off. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Hibino won 3-6 6-3 6-1 in the qualifications in at the U.S. Open back in August 2022.
Qiang Wang
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 17-12 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-20 | 22-12 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 10-14 | 4-9 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 101, the Chinese reached the 2nd round after defeating Yanina Wickmayer 6-4 1-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Chinese defeated Wickmayer (6-4 1-6 6-4). During the match, Wang scored 92 points vs Wickmayer’s 88. The Chinese was very aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Wang bagged 2 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Qiang Wang lost the serve 9 times and she saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Wang put 80% of her first serves in, winning 51% (45/88) of the points behind her 1st serve and 36% (8/22) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Wickmayer 8 times after converting 80% of her break points (8/10).
Wang has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of her matches (293-183). 22-10 on hard in 2022. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Wang has an overall 235-132 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Wang’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in Guadalajara, Prague and the Concord.
Qiang has an aggregate 29-18 win-loss record in 2022, 22-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Chennai
Qiang has never competed in this tournament before.
Nao Hibino
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26-26 | 15-13 | 10-11 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-32 | 21-21 | 2-7 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-30 | 26-19 | 9-7 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 26-19 | 7-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-21 | 1-9 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 185, Hibino reached the 2nd round after defeating Sai Chamarthi 6-1 6-0, Daniela Vismane 7-5 6-0 and Jana Fett 6-0 6-4.
In the 1st round, Hibino had a good straight sets win against Fett (6-0 6-4). During the match Hibino scored 59 points vs Fett’s 35. Nao was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Hibino made 2 aces and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Nao Hibino lost the serve once. Furthermore, Hibino put 65% of her first serves in, winning 83% (25/30) of the points behind her 1st serve and 44% (7/16) on the 2nd serve. Hibino broke Fett 5 times after converting 83% of her break points (5/6).
Hibino’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the W25 Chiang Rai.
Hibino has a composed 27-21 win-loss record in 2022, 20-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wang | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 47 |
| Pts | 92-88 | 186-105 |
| Total Points | 180 | 291 |
| Winners | 45 | 65 |
| %Winners | 49% | 35% |
Wang played 1 match while Hibino competed in 3 matches. Hibino started her run from the qualifications while Wang had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Qiang Wang lost 1 set while Nao Hibino hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Wang has played 3 set(s) less than Hibino (3 vs 6). Therefore, Wang played 20 games less than Hibino. Qiang scored 45 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Nao blasted 65 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wang | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1.3 |
| 1st in | 88/110 | 91/135 |
| %1st in | 80% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 45/88 | 65/91 |
| %1st pts | 51% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 8/22 | 29/44 |
| %2nd pts | 36% | 66% |
Wang recorded 2 aces . Hibino bagged 4 aces (1.3 per match). Wang won 51% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 36% of the points. On the other side, Hibino won 71% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 66% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wang | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 17 |
| Converted | 8/10 | 17/21 |
| % Converted | 80% | 81% |
| Conceded | 20 | 7 |
| Saved | 11 | 4 |
| % Saved | 55% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 9 | 3 |
Qiang broke her opponent 8 times with a 80% conversion rate. Wang lost her serve 9 times and she saved 55% of the break points that she conceded. Hibino broke her opponents 17 times with a 81% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded.
| Wang | |||
| R1 Wickmayer | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 92-88 | 92-88 | |
| Total points | 180 | 180 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 88/110 | 88/110 | |
| % 1st in | 80% | 80% | |
| 1st pts | 45/88 | 45/88 | |
| % 1st pts | 51% | 51% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/22 | 8/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 8 | 8 | |
| Converted | 8/10 | 8/10 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 20 | 20 | |
| Saved | 11/20 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 9 | 9 | |
| Hibino | |||||
| Q1 Chamarthi | Q3 Vismane | R1 Fett | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | 7-5 6-0 | 6-0 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 18 | 16 | 47 | |
| pts | 60-23 | 67-47 | 59-35 | 186-105 | |
| Total points | 83 | 114 | 94 | 291 | |
| Winners | 13 | 27 | 25 | 65 | |
| %Winners | 22% | 40% | 42% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 16/27 | 45/62 | 30/46 | 91/135 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 73% | 65% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 13/16 | 27/45 | 25/30 | 65/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 60% | 83% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/11 | 11/17 | 7/16 | 29/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 100% | 65% | 44% | 66% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | 5 | 17 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/7 | 5/6 | 17/21 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 86% | 83% | 81% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 | 1 | 7 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 4/6 | 0/1 | 4 | |
| Saved % | – | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Chennai
- Katie SwanSwan – Arianne HartonoHartono (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Ankita RainaRaina (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Anastasia GasanovaGasanova – Alison RiskeRiske (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Kyoka OkamuraOkamura (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Magda LinetteLinette – Moyuka UchijimaUchijima (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Oksana SelekhmetevaSelekhmeteva – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Olivia TjandramuliaTjandramulia (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Mariia TkachevaTkacheva (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Katarzyna KawaKawa – Astra SharmaSharma (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Linda FruhvirtovaFruhvirtova – En Shuo LiangShuo Liang (4-6 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Rebecca PetersonPeterson – Victoria Jimenez KasintsevaJimenez Kasintseva (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Eugenie BouchardBouchard – Joanne ZugerZuger (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Qiang WangWang – Yanina WickmayerWickmayer (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Nao HibinoHibino – Jana FettFett (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Karman Kaur ThandiKaur Thandi – Chloe PaquetPaquet (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Anastasia GasanovaGasanova – Alison RiskeRiske (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Katie SwanSwan – Arianne HartonoHartono (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Magda LinetteLinette – Moyuka UchijimaUchijima (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Oksana SelekhmetevaSelekhmeteva – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Kyoka OkamuraOkamura (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Ankita RainaRaina (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Olivia TjandramuliaTjandramulia (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Mariia TkachevaTkacheva (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Anastasia GasanovaGasanova – Katie SwanSwan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Qiang WangWang (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarzyna KawaKawa – Rebecca MarinoMarino (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karman Kaur ThandiKaur Thandi – Eugenie BouchardBouchard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Tatjana MariaMaria (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca PetersonPeterson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (0-0) – H2H and prediction