Henry Patten and James Kent Trotter will face off in the qualifications of the Cary Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 2:30 pm on STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Henry Patten who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Henry Patten is the pick to win this match.
Henry Patten -> 1.54
James Kent Trotter -> 2.35
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Henry Patten vs. James Kent Trotter
There is no head to head record between Henry Patten and James Kent Trotter since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Henry Patten
24 - 16win/loss
584
462
LWWLWLLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 24-17 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-10 | 23-7 | 0-1 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-9 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 469 (career-high), the Brit got to the qualifications after defeating Shunsuke Mitsui 4-6 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications against Mitsui, Henry recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-3). During the match, Patten scored 95 points vs Mitsui’s 91. The Brit was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Patten struck 3 aces and he was not very consistent on his 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Henry Patten lost the serve 5 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Patten put 54% of his first serves in, winning 64% (32/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (18/43) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Mitsui 7 times after converting 47% of his break points (7/15).
Patten has a solid match record in the last 3 years having won 65% of his matches (64-35). 16-10 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Patten has an aggregate45-23 match record in the last 3 years on hard.
The Brit’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Nottingham and M25 Roehampton.
Patten has an overall 23-16 win-loss record in 2022, 16-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cary Challenger
Henry has never competed in this tournament before.
James Kent Trotter
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-13 | 11-7 | 1-3 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-13 | 15-10 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-11 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 687, Kent reached the qualifications after beating Patrick Kypson 7-65 6-74 6-3.
In the qualifications, Kent defeated Kypson (7-65 6-74 6-3). During the match Kent scored 109 points vs Kypson’s 104. James was pretty aggressive to blast 62 winners.
Talking about serving, Kent buried his opponent with 21 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. James Kent Trotter conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 70% of his first serves in, win 90% (62/69) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (15/30) on the 2nd serve. The Japanese broke Kypson once after converting 10% of his break points (1/10).
The Japanese’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Edwardsville.
The Japanese has a composed 12-4 win-loss record in 2022, 11-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Patten | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 35 |
| Pts | 95-91 | 109-104 |
| Total Points | 186 | 213 |
| Winners | 32 | 62 |
| %Winners | 34% | 57% |
Both Patten and Kent played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Henry Patten surrendered 1 set, while James Kent Trotter surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Patten and Kent have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Patten played 7 games less than Kent. The Brit scored 32 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, James struck 62 winners (57%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Patten | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 21 |
| 1st in | 50/93 | 69/99 |
| %1st in | 54% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 32/50 | 62/69 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 90% |
| 2nd pts | 18/43 | 15/30 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 50% |
Patten recorded 3 aces . Kent made 21 aces . Patten won 64% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Kent won 90% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Patten | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 1 |
| Converted | 7/15 | 1/10 |
| % Converted | 47% | 10% |
| Conceded | 10 | 0 |
| Saved | 5 | 0 |
| % Saved | 50% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
The Brit broke his opponent 7 times with a 47% conversion rate. The Brit dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Japanese broke his opponent once with a 10% conversion rate. The Japanese was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Patten | |||
| Q1 Mitsui |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 95-91 | 95-91 | |
| Total points | 186 | 186 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 10 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 50/93 | 50/93 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 32/50 | 32/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/43 | 18/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/15 | 7/15 | |
| Converted % | 47% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/10 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Kent | |||
| Q1 Kypson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-74 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 109-104 | 109-104 | |
| Total points | 213 | 213 | |
| Winners | 62 | 62 | |
| %Winners | 57% | 57% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 21 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 69/99 | 69/99 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 62/69 | 62/69 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 15/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/10 | 1/10 | |
| Converted % | 10% | 10% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWLWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – Donald YoungYoung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Daniel CoxCox (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nathan PonwithPonwith – Garrett JohnsJohns (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ezekiel ClarkClark – Ryan HarrisonHarrison (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Facundo MenaMena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Govind NandaNanda (1-0) – H2H and prediction
