Billy Harris and Gage Brymer will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:30 am on COURT B. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Billy Harris who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Billy Harris is the pick to win this match.
Billy Harris -> 1.33
Gage Brymer -> 3.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Billy Harris vs. Gage Brymer
There is no head to head record between Billy Harris and Gage Brymer since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Billy Harris
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-17 | 3-3 | 6-8 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-34 | 27-15 | 7-8 | 14-5 | 11-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-34 | 23-13 | 10-9 | 9-8 | 2-3 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 51-20 | 13-5 | 38-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 27-13 | 19-10 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 305, Billy reached the 2nd round after beating Benjamin Lock 6-3 7-64.
In the 1st round, Harris had a good straight sets win against Lock (6-3 7-64). During the match, Harris scored 67 points vs Lock’s 55. Billy was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Harris managed to score 13 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Billy Harris was quite efficient on serve to win 86% (31/36) of his 1st serve and 67% (14/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Billy broke Lock twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Harris has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (286-167). 20-10 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Harris has a composed117-63 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
Billy’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Antalya and M25 Nottingham.
The Brit has a compiled 41-27 win-loss record in 2022, 20-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger
Gage Brymer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 18-30 | 18-27 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-36 | 41-31 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-28 | 35-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-6 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 62-35 | 62-34 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 466, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul 7-61 6-0, Dayne Kelly 7-64 7-5 and James McCabe 2-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against McCabe, Brymer recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-3 6-4). During the match Brymer and McCabe scored the same amount of points (79). However, the world no. 305 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Gage was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
About the serving games, Brymer scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Gage Brymer lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Brymer put 59% of his first serves in, winning 65% (35/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (20/38) on the 2nd serve. Gage broke McCabe 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
The American’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Rancho Santa Fe.
The American has an overall 41-27 win-loss record in 2022, 39-25 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Harris | Brymer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 71 |
| Pts | 67-55 | 225-198 |
| Total Points | 122 | 423 |
| Winners | 31 | 107 |
| %Winners | 46% | 48% |
Harris played 1 match while Brymer competed in 3 matches. Brymer started his run from the qualifications while Harris had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Gage Brymer lost 1 set while Billy Harris hasn’t conceded a set so far. Harris has played 5 set(s) less than Brymer (2 vs 7). Therefore, Harris played 49 games less than Brymer. The Brit scored 31 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 107 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Harris | Brymer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 13 | 2.7 |
| 1st in | 36/57 | 147/231 |
| %1st in | 63% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 31/36 | 107/147 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 51/84 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 61% |
Harris fired 13 aces . Brymer fired 8 aces (2.7 per match). Harris won 86% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Brymer won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Harris | Brymer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 8 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 8/13 |
| % Converted | 33% | 62% |
| Conceded | 1 | 14 |
| Saved | 0 | 10 |
| % Saved | 0% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Billy broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. The Brit dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Brymer broke his opponents 8 times with a 62% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Harris | |||
| R1 Lock |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 67-55 | 67-55 | |
| Total points | 122 | 122 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 36/57 | 36/57 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 31/36 | 31/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 14/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Brymer | |||||
| Q1 Trongcharoenchaikul |
Q3 Kelly |
R1 McCabe |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 6-0 | 7-64 7-5 | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 25 | 27 | 71 | |
| pts | 64-40 | 82-79 | 79-79 | 225-198 | |
| Total points | 104 | 161 | 158 | 423 | |
| Winners | 29 | 43 | 35 | 107 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 52% | 44% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 5 | 1 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 34/49 | 59/90 | 54/92 | 147/231 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 66% | 59% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 29/34 | 43/59 | 35/54 | 107/147 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 73% | 65% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/15 | 19/31 | 20/38 | 51/84 | |
| % 2nd pts | 80% | 61% | 53% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 1 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 1/2 | 4/5 | 8/13 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | 80% | 62% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 | 10 | 14 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 4/4 | 6/10 | 10 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 60% | 160% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLWWLL
Tennis Scores in Nonthaburi 3 Challenger
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – Federico GaioGaio (6-4 4-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (7-62 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (2-6 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis IstominIstomin – Omar JasikaJasika (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Gage BrymerBrymer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Makoto OchiOchi – Akira SantillanSantillan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stuart ParkerParker – Yshai OlielOliel (0-3) – H2H and prediction
