Marek Gengel and Albano Olivetti will play each other in the qualifications of the Cassis Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:00 pm on CENTRAL CABESTO. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Albano Olivetti who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Albano Olivetti is the pick to win this match.
Albano Olivetti -> 1.56
Marek Gengel -> 2.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marek Gengel vs. Albano Olivetti
There is no head to head record between Marek Gengel and Albano Olivetti since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Marek Gengel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-22 | 42-18 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-27 | 14-15 | 0-7 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-29 | 28-16 | 4-8 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 52-28 | 47-14 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-17 | 16-12 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 382 (career-high), Gengel reached the qualifications after defeating Saba Purtseladze 7-5 6-0.
In the qualifications, Marek had a good straight sets win against Purtseladze (7-5 6-0). During the match, Gengel scored 73 points vs Purtseladze’s 52. Gengel was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gengel scored just 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 3 double faults. Marek Gengel lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Gengel put 64% of his first serves in, winning 83% (29/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (9/20) on the 2nd serve. Marek broke Purtseladze 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Gengel has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 56% of his matches (200-159). 14-7 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gengel has an aggregate143-72 record in the last 7 years on hard.
The Czech’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Sharm ElSheikh.
Marek has an overall 23-19 win-loss record in 2022, 14-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cassis Challenger
Gengel has never competed in this tournament before.
Albano Olivetti
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2023 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 8-5 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Olivetti got to the qualifications after defeating Alexey Vatutin 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Vatutin (6-3 6-2). During the match Olivetti scored 61 points vs Vatutin’s 41. Albano was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Olivetti recorded 10 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Albano Olivetti was pretty efficient on serve to win 86% (25/29) of his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Olivetti broke Vatutin 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Olivetti has a composed 7-3 win-loss record in 2022, 3-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gengel | Olivetti |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 |
| Pts | 73-52 | 61-41 |
| Total Points | 125 | 102 |
| Winners | 29 | 25 |
| %Winners | 40% | 41% |
Both Gengel and Olivetti played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gengel and Olivetti have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gengel played 1 game more than Olivetti. The Czech scored 29 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The French player recorded 25 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gengel | Olivetti |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 10 |
| 1st in | 35/55 | 29/55 |
| %1st in | 64% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 25/29 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 9/20 | 15/26 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 58% |
Gengel scored 1 ace . Olivetti also managed to score 10 aces . Gengel won 83% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Olivetti won 86% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gengel | Olivetti |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 71% | 50% |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 75% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Czech broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Albano was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Gengel | |||
| Q1 Purtseladze |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 73-52 | 73-52 | |
| Total points | 125 | 125 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 35/55 | 35/55 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 29/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/20 | 9/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Olivetti | |||
| Q1 Vatutin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 61-41 | 61-41 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 29/55 | 29/55 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 25/29 | 25/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWLWLLLW
LWWWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas RosolRosol – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thomaz BellucciBellucci – Jurgen BriandBriand (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kenny de Schepperde Schepper – Thomas LaurentLaurent (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Skander MansouriMansouri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Albano OlivettiOlivetti – Marek GengelGengel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arjun KadheKadhe – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo WallartWallart – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine BellierBellier – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Clement TaburTabur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Kaichi UchidaUchida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
