Viktor Durasovic and Inigo Cervantes will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Seville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on PISTA 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Viktor Durasovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Viktor Durasovic is the pick to win this match.
Viktor Durasovic -> 1.56
Inigo Cervantes -> 2.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Viktor Durasovic vs. Inigo Cervantes
There is no head to head record between Viktor Durasovic and Inigo Cervantes since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Viktor Durasovic
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 48-33 | 19-10 | 15-15 | 14-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 25-37 | 5-8 | 17-18 | 2-9 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
2022 | 28-36 | 2-7 | 15-18 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 31-24 | 2-4 | 13-12 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-14 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 341, Durasovic got to the qualifications after defeating Eric Vanshelboim 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Norwegian had a good straight sets win against Vanshelboim (6-2 6-4). During the match, Durasovic scored 65 points vs Vanshelboim’s 44. Durasovic was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Durasovic bagged 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Viktor Durasovic lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Durasovic put 56% of his first serves in, winning 90% (27/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (10/24) on the 2nd serve. Durasovic broke Vanshelboim 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Durasovic has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 54% of his matches (248-209). 13-16 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Durasovic has an overall74-79 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Durasovic has a composed 18-27 win-loss record in 2022, 13-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Seville Challenger
Durasovic has never competed in this tournament before.
Inigo Cervantes
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 5-2 | 3-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 12-14 | 0-2 | 12-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 8-4 | 7-2 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 14-8 | 0-0 | 14-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 873, Inigo got to the qualifications after defeating Martin Cuevas 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Spaniard had a good straight sets win against Cuevas (6-4 6-1). During the match Cervantes scored 68 points vs Cuevas’s 47. Inigo was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Cervantes recorded 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Inigo Cervantes was pretty effective on serve to win 77% (23/30) of his 1st serve and 61% (17/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Spaniard broke Cuevas 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
The Spaniard’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Santander.
The Spaniard has a composed 12-10 win-loss record in 2022, 12-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Durasovic | Cervantes |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 18 | 17 |
Pts | 65-44 | 68-47 |
Total Points | 109 | 115 |
Winners | 27 | 23 |
%Winners | 42% | 34% |
Both Durasovic and Cervantes played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Durasovic and Cervantes have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Durasovic played 1 game more than Cervantes. Viktor scored 27 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Cervantes fired 23 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Durasovic | Cervantes |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 10 |
Avg per match | 3 | 10 |
1st in | 30/54 | 30/58 |
%1st in | 56% | 52% |
1st pts | 27/30 | 23/30 |
%1st pts | 90% | 77% |
2nd pts | 10/24 | 17/28 |
%2nd pts | 42% | 61% |
Durasovic managed to score 3 aces . Cervantes recorded 10 aces . Durasovic won 90% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Cervantes won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Durasovic | Cervantes |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 4 |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/9 |
% Converted | 50% | 44% |
Conceded | 2 | 3 |
Saved | 1 | 2 |
% Saved | 50% | 67% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Durasovic broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Viktor surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Cervantes broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Inigo conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Durasovic | |||
Q1 Vanshelboim |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 65-44 | 65-44 | |
Total points | 109 | 109 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 30/54 | 30/54 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 27/30 | 27/30 | |
% 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
2nd pts | 10/24 | 10/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Cervantes | |||
Q1 Cuevas |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 68-47 | 68-47 | |
Total points | 115 | 115 | |
Winners | 23 | 23 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 10 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 30/58 | 30/58 | |
% 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
1st pts | 23/30 | 23/30 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 17/28 | 17/28 | |
% 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jerzy JanowiczJanowicz – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Giovanni FonioFonio (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Miljan ZekicZekic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bogdan BobrovBobrov – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Inigo CervantesCervantes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Benjamin Winter LopezWinter Lopez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Oscar Jose GutierrezJose Gutierrez (0-0) – H2H and prediction