Stuart Parker and Timo Legout will square off in the qualifications of the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Stuart Parker who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Stuart Parker is the pick to win this match.
Stuart Parker -> 1.64
Timo Legout -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Stuart Parker vs. Timo Legout
There is no head to head record between Stuart Parker and Timo Legout since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Stuart Parker
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-8 | 22-6 | 0-0 | 4-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-21 | 18-12 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-26 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 7-5 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 44-16 | 40-12 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 24-10 | 18-8 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
Ranked no. 464, Stuart got to the qualifications after beating Adil Kalyanpur 6-0 6-0.
In the qualifications, Stuart had a good straight sets win against Kalyanpur (6-0 6-0). During the match, Parker scored 59 points vs Kalyanpur’s 27. Parker was extremely aggressive to blast 15 winners.
Regarding the service games, Parker blasted 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Stuart Parker was pretty efficient on serve to win 83% (15/18) of his 1st serve and 82% (9/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit broke Kalyanpur 6 times after converting 38% of his break points (6/16).
Parker has a solid win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 65% of his matches (120-64). 12-10 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Parker has an aggregate80-36 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.
Parker’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Nottingham.
The Brit has a composed 25-19 win-loss record in 2022, 12-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger
Timo Legout
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-4 | 4-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-16 | 4-2 | 15-11 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 32-20 | 12-8 | 19-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-20 | 0-1 | 22-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 495, the French player reached the qualifications after defeating Seita Watanabe 6-2 4-6 6-2.
In the qualifications, Legout defeated Watanabe (6-2 4-6 6-2). During the match Legout scored 88 points vs Watanabe’s 77. Legout was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Legout blasted 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Timo Legout lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Legout put 67% of his first serves in, winning 71% (39/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Watanabe 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
The French player best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Montauban.
Legout has a compiled 27-14 win-loss record in 2022, 8-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Parker | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 12 | 26 |
| Pts | 59-27 | 88-77 |
| Total Points | 86 | 165 |
| Winners | 15 | 39 |
| %Winners | 25% | 44% |
Both Parker and Legout played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Timo Legout lost 1 set while Stuart Parker hasn’t dropped a set so far. Parker has played 1 set(s) less than Legout (2 vs 3). Therefore, Parker played 14 games less than Legout. Stuart scored 15 winners (25% of the total points). On the other side, Timo fired 39 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Parker | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 5 |
| 1st in | 18/29 | 55/82 |
| %1st in | 62% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 15/18 | 39/55 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 9/11 | 13/27 |
| %2nd pts | 82% | 48% |
Parker fired 4 aces . Legout fired 5 aces . Parker won 83% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 82% of the points. On the other side, Legout won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Parker | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/16 | 5/13 |
| % Converted | 38% | 38% |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Brit broke his opponent 6 times with a 38% conversion rate. Parker was rock solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Timo broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Timo conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Parker | |||
| Q1 Kalyanpur |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 12 | |
| pts | 59-27 | 59-27 | |
| Total points | 86 | 86 | |
| Winners | 15 | 15 | |
| %Winners | 25% | 25% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 18/29 | 18/29 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 15/18 | 15/18 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/11 | 9/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 82% | 82% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/16 | 6/16 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Legout | |||
| Q1 Watanabe |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 88-77 | 88-77 | |
| Total points | 165 | 165 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 55/82 | 55/82 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 39/55 | 39/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 13/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWWWWW
LWLLWWLWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – Yuttana CharoenphonCharoenphon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gage BrymerBrymer – Dayne KellyKelly (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pruchya IsarowIsarow – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pol WattanakulWattanakul – Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Akira SantillanSantillan – Valentin VacherotVacherot (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Benjamin LockLock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ben PataelPatael – Federico GaioGaio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Yunseong ChungChung (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Makoto OchiOchi – Thantub SuksumrarnSuksumrarn (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Charles BroomBroom (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yshai OlielOliel – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stuart ParkerParker – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Denis IstominIstomin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Ajeet RaiRai (0-0) – H2H and prediction
