Matteo Arnaldi and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe will face off in the semifinal of the Como Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 1:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Matteo Arnaldi who should win in 3 sets.
Matteo Arnaldi -> 1.79
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe -> 1.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Matteo Arnaldi vs. Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
There is no head to head record between Matteo Arnaldi and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Matteo Arnaldi
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 29-26 | 17-13 | 10-9 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 51-26 | 21-15 | 23-7 | 4-3 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 50-35 | 9-3 | 37-20 | 4-11 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 56-24 | 2-1 | 51-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 17-9 | 16-4 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 187, Matteo got to the semifinal after defeating Vitaliy Sachko 6-2 0-0 ret., Giovanni Oradini 2-6 7-5 6-2 and Nerman Fatic 7-5 2-6 7-64.
In the quarter, The Italian defeated Fatic (7-5 2-6 7-64). During the match, Arnaldi scored 115 points vs Fatic’s 112. Arnaldi was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Regarding the service games, Arnaldi scored just 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 2 double faults. Matteo Arnaldi lost the serve 7 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Arnaldi put 63% of his first serves in, winning 64% (44/69) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (15/41) on the 2nd serve. Arnaldi broke Fatic 6 times after converting 40% of his break points (6/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Matteo has conceded 2 set in this tournament to conquer 51% of the points he played.
Arnaldi has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 63% of his matches (123-71). 34-17 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Arnaldi has an overall89-45 record in the last 5 years on clay.
The Italian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Francavilla Challenger and the San Marino Challenger.
The Italian has a compiled 37-24 win-loss record in 2022, 34-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Como Challenger
The Italian has never competed in this tournament before.
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 28-25 | 2-6 | 10-13 | 15-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 14-20 | 4-7 | 9-9 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 18-11 | 5-4 | 4-4 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
2019 | 18-18 | 1-3 | 6-8 | 11-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 233, Cedrik-Marcel got to the semifinal after defeating Mirza Basic 6-4 6-0, Lucas Gerch 4-6 6-3 6-2 and Kenny de Schepper 6-3 6-2.
In the quarter, The German had a good straight sets win against de Schepper (6-3 6-2). During the match Stebe scored 70 points vs de Schepper’s 51. Stebe was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Stebe scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was very solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Cedrik-Marcel Stebe was very efficient on serve to win 76% (28/37) of his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The German broke de Schepper 3 times after converting 23% of his break points (3/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The German has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
The German’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Forli 1 Challenger,the Forli 3 Challenger and the Lugano Challenger.
The German has a composed 25-22 win-loss record in 2022, 8-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Arnaldi | Stebe |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 3 |
Tot Set | 9 | 7 |
Tot Games | 69 | 60 |
Pts | 240-222 | 235-180 |
Total Points | 462 | 415 |
Winners | 95 | 89 |
%Winners | 40% | 38% |
Both Arnaldi and Stebe played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Matteo Arnaldi lost 2 sets, while Cedrik-Marcel Stebe surrendered 1 set. Arnaldi has played 2 sets more than Stebe (9 vs 7). Therefore, Arnaldi played 9 games more than Stebe. Arnaldi scored 95 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Stebe bagged 89 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Arnaldi | Stebe |
---|---|---|
Aces | 12 | 5 |
Avg per match | 4 | 1.7 |
1st in | 143/225 | 123/200 |
%1st in | 64% | 62% |
1st pts | 95/143 | 89/123 |
%1st pts | 66% | 72% |
2nd pts | 34/82 | 43/77 |
%2nd pts | 41% | 56% |
Arnaldi recorded 12 aces (4 per match). Stebe blasted 5 aces (1.7 per match). Arnaldi won 66% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Stebe won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Arnaldi | Stebe |
---|---|---|
Won | 14 | 13 |
Converted | 14/29 | 13/41 |
% Converted | 48% | 32% |
Conceded | 29 | 15 |
Saved | 17 | 11 |
% Saved | 59% | 73% |
Times Broken | 12 | 4 |
Arnaldi broke his opponents 14 times with a 48% conversion rate. The Italian lost his serve 12 times and he saved 59% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponents 13 times with a 32% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
Arnaldi | |||||
R1 Sachko | R2 Oradini | 1/4 Fatic | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 0-0 ret. | 2-6 7-5 6-2 | 7-5 2-6 7-64 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 8 | 28 | 33 | 69 | |
pts | 32-19 | 93-91 | 115-112 | 240-222 | |
Total points | 51 | 184 | 227 | 462 | |
Winners | 12 | 39 | 44 | 95 | |
%Winners | 38% | 42% | 38% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 3 | 8 | 1 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 2 | 9 | |
1st in | 15/26 | 59/89 | 69/110 | 143/225 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 66% | 63% | 64% | |
1st pts | 12/15 | 39/59 | 44/69 | 95/143 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 66% | 64% | 66% | |
2nd pts | 7/11 | 12/30 | 15/41 | 34/82 | |
% 2nd pts | 64% | 40% | 37% | 41% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 2 | 6 | 6 | 14 | |
Converted | 2/3 | 6/11 | 6/15 | 14/29 | |
Converted % | 67% | 55% | 40% | 48% | |
Conceded | 2 | 12 | 15 | 29 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 7/12 | 8/15 | 17 | |
Saved % | 100% | 58% | 53% | 70% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 5 | 7 | 12 |
Stebe | |||||
R1 Basic | R2 Gerch | 1/4 de Schepper | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-0 | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 27 | 17 | 60 | |
pts | 63-42 | 102-87 | 70-51 | 235-180 | |
Total points | 105 | 189 | 121 | 415 | |
Winners | 23 | 38 | 28 | 89 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | 40% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | |
1st in | 28/45 | 58/100 | 37/55 | 123/200 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 58% | 67% | 62% | |
1st pts | 23/28 | 38/58 | 28/37 | 89/123 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 66% | 76% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 8/17 | 23/42 | 12/18 | 43/77 | |
% 2nd pts | 47% | 55% | 67% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 5 | 3 | 13 | |
Converted | 5/12 | 5/16 | 3/13 | 13/41 | |
Converted % | 42% | 31% | 23% | 32% | |
Conceded | 2 | 11 | 2 | 15 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 8/11 | 2/2 | 11 | |
Saved % | 50% | 73% | 100% | 74% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
Tennis Scores in Como Challenger
- Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi – Nerman FaticFatic (7-5 2-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (4-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Matteo GiganteGigante (6-74 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction