Nerman Fatic and Lucas Miedler will face off in the 2^nd round of the Como Challenger for the 2^nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nerman Fatic who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Nerman Fatic is the pick to win this match.
Nerman Fatic -> 1.68
Lucas Miedler -> 2.13

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Nerman Fatic vs. Lucas Miedler

This will be the 2^nd time that Nerman Fatic and Lucas Miedler square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Fatic (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.

The last time that they fought against each other, Fatic won 6-3 6-3 in the 1^st round in the Manama Challenger back in 2021.

Nerman Fatic

Ranked no. 279, the Bosnian reached the 2^nd round after beating Marco Cecchinato 6-7² 7-6² 6-1.

In the 1^st round against Cecchinato, The Bosnian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-7² 7-6² 6-1). During the match, Fatic scored 114 points vs Cecchinato’s 103. Fatic was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.

Regarding the service games, Fatic struck 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Nerman Fatic lost the serve 4 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Fatic put 53% of his first serves in, winning 70% (42/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 51% (27/53) on the 2nd serve. Fatic broke Cecchinato 7 times after converting 44% of his break points (7/16).

Fatic has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (263-183). 21-16 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Fatic has an overall216-138 match record in the last 8 years on clay.

The Bosnian’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Antalya.

Nerman has an aggregate 21-20 win-loss record in 2022, 21-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Como Challenger

Nerman has never competed in this tournament before.

Lucas Miedler

Ranked no. 337, Miedler got to the 2^nd round after defeating Otto Virtanen 2-6 7-6² 3-1 ret..

In the 1^st round against Virtanen, Miedler recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 7-6² 3-1 ret.). During the match Miedler scored 92 points vs Virtanen’s 89. Lucas was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.

About the serving games, Miedler bagged 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Lucas Miedler lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Miedler put 56% of his first serves in, winning 65% (32/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (21/39) on the 2nd serve. Lucas broke Virtanen 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).

Miedler’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Loule.

Miedler has an aggregate 21-16 win-loss record in 2022, 15-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Como Challenger

Previously, his best result was reaching the 1^st round in 2021. See his history.

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Fatic	Miedler
Match played	1	1
Tot Set	3	4
Tot Games	33	25
Pts	114-103	92-89
Total Points	217	181
Winners	42	32
%Winners	37%	35%

Both Fatic and Miedler played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Nerman Fatic conceded 1 set, while Lucas Miedler surrendered 1 set. Fatic has played 1 set(s) less than Miedler (3 vs 4). However, it’s interesting to notice that Fatic played 8 games more than Miedler. Nerman scored 42 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Austrian bagged 32 winners (35%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Fatic	Miedler
Aces	4	4
Avg per match	4	4
1st in	60/113	49/88
%1st in	53%	56%
1st pts	42/60	32/49
%1st pts	70%	65%
2nd pts	27/53	21/39
%2nd pts	51%	54%

Fatic struck 4 aces . Miedler struck 4 aces . Fatic won 70% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Miedler won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Fatic	Miedler
Won	7	3
Converted	7/16	3/8
% Converted	44%	38%
Conceded	14	9
Saved	10	5
% Saved	71%	56%
Times Broken	4	4

Nerman broke his opponent 7 times with a 44% conversion rate. Nerman conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Miedler broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Miedler conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.

Fatic
	R1 Cecchinato	Total
Score	6-72 7-62 6-1
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	33	33
pts	114-103	114-103
Total points	217	217
Winners	42	42
%Winners	37%	37%
SERVE
Aces	4	4
Double Faults	4	4
1st in	60/113	60/113
% 1st in	53%	53%
1st pts	42/60	42/60
% 1st pts	70%	70%
2nd pts	27/53	27/53
% 2nd pts	51%	51%
Breaks
Won	7	7
Converted	7/16	7/16
Converted %	44%	44%
Conceded	14	14
Saved	10/14	10
Saved %	71%	71%
Times Broken	4	4

Miedler
	R1 Virtanen	Total
Score	2-6 7-62 3-1 ret.
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	25	25
pts	92-89	92-89
Total points	181	181
Winners	32	32
%Winners	35%	35%
SERVE
Aces	4	4
Double Faults	2	2
1st in	49/88	49/88
% 1st in	56%	56%
1st pts	32/49	32/49
% 1st pts	65%	65%
2nd pts	21/39	21/39
% 2nd pts	54%	54%
Breaks
Won	3	3
Converted	3/8	3/8
Converted %	38%	38%
Conceded	9	9
Saved	5/9	5
Saved %	56%	56%
Times Broken	4	4

Tennis Scores in Como Challenger

• Francesco PassaroPassaro – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (7-6⁵ 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
• Kenny de Schepperde Schepper – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (4-6 6-3 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
• Marius CopilCopil – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (7-6⁴ 4-6 7-6²) – See score progression
• Lucas GerchGerch – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (7-6² 7-5) – See score progression
• Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Adrian AndreevAndreev (7-6⁴ 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
• Lukas KleinKlein – Gianmarco FerrariFerrari (4-6 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
• Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
• Nerman FaticFatic – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (6-7² 7-6² 6-1) – See score progression
• Miljan ZekicZekic – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Cezar CretuCretu (7-6¹ 6-2) – See score progression
• Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-2 0-0 ret.) – See score progression
• Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-4 6-7⁴ 7-6⁵) – See score progression
• Giovanni OradiniOradini – Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres (6-1 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
• Lucas MiedlerMiedler – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (2-6 7-6² 3-1 ret.) – See score progression
• Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Mirza BasicBasic (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
• Matteo GiganteGigante – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (6-7⁴ 6-2 6-1) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Kenny de Schepperde Schepper – Marius CopilCopil (0-2) – H2H and prediction
• Miljan ZekicZekic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Francesco PassaroPassaro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (2-1) – H2H and prediction
• Nerman FaticFatic – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (1-0) – H2H and prediction
• Lucas GerchGerch – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Giovanni OradiniOradini – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Lukas KleinKlein – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction