Jordan Thompson and Juncheng Shang will fight against each other in the quarter of the Granby Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 11:00 am on COURT CENTRAL. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Juncheng Shang who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Juncheng Shang is the pick to win this match.
Juncheng Shang -> 1.88
Jordan Thompson -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jordan Thompson vs. Juncheng Shang
There is no head to head record between Jordan Thompson and Juncheng Shang since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jordan Thompson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-11 | 11-7 | 3-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-28 | 22-15 | 0-3 | 7-4 | 12-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-26 | 18-14 | 2-6 | 8-1 | 12-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-25 | 10-11 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 9-5 | 2-2 |
| 2020 | 12-13 | 6-6 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 103, the Australian got to the quarter after beating Liam Draxl 7-5 6-1 and Justin Boulais 2-6 6-4 7-67.
In the 2nd round against Boulais, Thompson recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-4 7-67).During the match, Thompson scored less points (8) than Boulais. In fact, the world no. 103 won 99 points vs Boulais’s. That means that Thompson was more focused during the important points. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Thompson scored 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jordan Thompson lost the serve 6 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Thompson put 64% of his first serves in, winning 56% (38/68) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (20/38) on the 2nd serve. Jordan broke Boulais 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian has lost 1 set in this competition to conquer 51% of the points he played.
Thompson has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (374-252). 10-10 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Thompson has a composed 211-138 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Jordan’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Surbiton Challenger and the Nottingham Challenger.
The Australian has an overall 26-22 win-loss record in 2022, 10-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Granby Challenger
Thompson has never competed in this tournament before.
Juncheng Shang
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-9 | 9-5 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-23 | 21-14 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-24 | 17-8 | 15-10 | 7-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-5 | 6-3 | 12-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 246, Juncheng reached the quarter after defeating Marko Stakusic 6-4 6-4 and Colin Markes 6-2 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Juncheng had a good straight sets win against Markes (6-2 6-2). During the match Shang scored 55 points vs Markes’s 32. Shang was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about serving, Shang couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Juncheng Shang was very efficient on serve to win 90% (18/20) of his 1st serve and 82% (14/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Shang broke Markes 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Juncheng hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
The Chinese’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Naples and the Lexington Challenger.
Shang has an overall 30-16 win-loss record in 2022, 9-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Thompson | Shang |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 50 | 36 |
| Pts | 165-156 | 131-97 |
| Total Points | 321 | 228 |
| Winners | 65 | 51 |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% |
Both Thompson and Shang played 2 matches. At the moment, Jordan Thompson lost 1 set while Juncheng Shang hasn’t dropped a set so far. Thompson has played 1 set more than Shang (5 vs 4). Therefore, Thompson played 14 games more than Shang. Thompson scored 65 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Shang blasted 51 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Thompson | Shang |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 1.5 |
| 1st in | 107/165 | 60/103 |
| %1st in | 65% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 65/107 | 51/60 |
| %1st pts | 61% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 32/58 | 27/43 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 63% |
Thompson scored 6 aces (3 per match). Shang recorded 3 aces (1.5 per match). Thompson won 61% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Shang won 85% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Thompson | Shang |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 6 |
| Converted | 10/17 | 6/15 |
| % Converted | 59% | 40% |
| Conceded | 17 | 1 |
| Saved | 10 | 1 |
| % Saved | 59% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 0 |
Jordan broke his opponents 10 times with a 59% conversion rate. Jordan conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 59% of the break points that he conceded. Juncheng broke his opponents 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Chinese was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Thompson | ||||
| R1 Draxl |
R2 Boulais |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-1 | 2-6 6-4 7-67 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 31 | 50 | |
| pts | 66-49 | 99-107 | 165-156 | |
| Total points | 115 | 206 | 321 | |
| Winners | 27 | 38 | 65 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 38% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 39/59 | 68/106 | 107/165 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 64% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 27/39 | 38/68 | 65/107 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 56% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 20/38 | 32/58 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 53% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/8 | 10/17 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 63% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 11 | 17 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5/11 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 45% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 | 7 | |
| Shang | ||||
| R1 Stakusic |
R2 Markes |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 16 | 36 | |
| pts | 76-65 | 55-32 | 131-97 | |
| Total points | 141 | 87 | 228 | |
| Winners | 33 | 18 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 33% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 1 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 40/66 | 20/37 | 60/103 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 54% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 33/40 | 18/20 | 51/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 90% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/26 | 14/17 | 27/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 82% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 4/7 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 57% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWLLLW
LWLWLWWLWL Tennis Scores in Granby Challenger
- Julian Cash/Henry PattenCash/Henry Patten – Ezekiel Clark/Kyle SeeligClark/Kyle Seelig (6-3 6-75 10-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Ugo HumbertHumbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
