Botic Van De Zandschulp and Benjamin Bonzi will square off in the quarter of the Winston-Salem for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 4:30 pm on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.55
Benjamin Bonzi -> 2.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Benjamin Bonzi
This will be the 2nd time that Botic Van De Zandschulp and Benjamin Bonzi play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Van De Zandschulp (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Van De Zandschulp won 6-4 7-5 in the 1st round in the Hamburg Challenger back in 2020.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 7-9 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 23 (career-high), the Dutch reached the quarter after beating Tallon Griekspoor 7-65 6-3 and Jaume Antoni Munar Clar 6-3 6-3.
In the 3rd round, Van De Zandschulp had a good straight sets win against Munar Clar (6-3 6-3). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 71 points vs Munar Clar’s 57. Van De Zandschulp was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van De Zandschulp struck 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 59% of his first serves in, winning 72% (28/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (12/27) on the 2nd serve. Botic broke Munar Clar 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Botic hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 66% of his matches (278-141). 12-9 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Van De Zandschulp has a compiled40-21 record in the last 8 years on hard.
Botic’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in Munich.
The Dutch has a compiled 30-21 win-loss record in 2022, 12-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
The Dutch has never competed in this tournament before.
Benjamin Bonzi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10-9 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 50-32 | 13-13 | 7-10 | 24-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-26 | 10-8 | 2-4 | 17-11 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-27 | 7-10 | 9-5 | 11-8 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 57-27 | 23-5 | 7-7 | 20-13 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 50, the French player reached the quarter after beating Kyle Edmund 6-4 7-65 and Thiago Moura Monteiro 7-5 6-2.
In the 3rd round, The French player had a good straight sets win against Moura Monteiro (7-5 6-2). During the match Bonzi scored 68 points vs Moura Monteiro’s 56. The French player was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Bonzi struck 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Benjamin Bonzi lost the serve once. Furthermore, Bonzi put 63% of his first serves in, winning 84% (32/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (10/22) on the 2nd serve. Benjamin broke Moura Monteiro 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Bonzi hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Bonzi’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Cherbourg Challenger and the Aix En Provence Challenger.
Benjamin has an overall 32-19 win-loss record in 2022, 6-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Bonzi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 40 | 43 |
| Pts | 149-123 | 147-127 |
| Total Points | 272 | 274 |
| Winners | 60 | 61 |
| %Winners | 40% | 41% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Bonzi played 2 matches. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Van De Zandschulp and Bonzi have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Van De Zandschulp played 3 games less than Bonzi. Van De Zandschulp scored 60 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Bonzi fired 61 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Bonzi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 6 |
| 1st in | 76/136 | 73/129 |
| %1st in | 56% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 60/76 | 61/73 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 29/60 | 27/56 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 48% |
Van De Zandschulp managed to score 10 aces (5 per match). Bonzi blasted 12 aces (6 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 79% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Bonzi won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Bonzi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 7 |
| Converted | 7/9 | 7/17 |
| % Converted | 78% | 41% |
| Conceded | 9 | 5 |
| Saved | 6 | 2 |
| % Saved | 67% | 40% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Botic broke his opponents 7 times with a 78% conversion rate. The Dutch dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Benjamin broke his opponents 7 times with a 41% conversion rate. Benjamin conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | ||||
| R2 Griekspoor |
R3 Munar Clar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-3 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 18 | 40 | |
| pts | 78-66 | 71-57 | 149-123 | |
| Total points | 144 | 128 | 272 | |
| Winners | 32 | 28 | 60 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 39% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 7 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 37/70 | 39/66 | 76/136 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 59% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 32/37 | 28/39 | 60/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 72% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/33 | 12/27 | 29/60 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 44% | 48% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 5/7 | 7/9 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 71% | 78% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 | 9 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 5/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 71% | 61% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Bonzi | ||||
| R2 Edmund |
R3 Moura Monteiro |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-65 | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 20 | 43 | |
| pts | 79-71 | 68-56 | 147-127 | |
| Total points | 150 | 124 | 274 | |
| Winners | 29 | 32 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 47% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 35/69 | 38/60 | 73/129 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 63% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 32/38 | 61/73 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/34 | 10/22 | 27/56 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 45% | 48% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 4/9 | 7/17 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 44% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 0/1 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 0% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWLWW
LLWLLLLWLW Tennis Scores in Salem Open
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (7-62 3-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (6-74 6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Dominic ThiemThiem (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Steve JohnsonJohnson (6-73 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Laslo DjereDjere – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (7-64 6-79 6-3) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Dominic ThiemThiem (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Maxime CressyCressy (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – Richard GasquetGasquet (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
