Henry Patten and Aidan Mayo will square off in the 2nd round of the Granby Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Henry Patten who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Henry Patten is the pick to win this match.
Henry Patten -> 1.444
Aidan Mayo -> 2.69
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Henry Patten vs. Aidan Mayo
There is no head to head record between Henry Patten and Aidan Mayo since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Henry Patten
22 - 16win/loss
584
462
LWWLWLLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 24-17 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-10 | 23-7 | 0-1 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-9 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 483, Henry got to the 2nd round after defeating Kyle Seelig 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Patten had a good straight sets win against Seelig (6-4 6-3). During the match, Patten scored 73 points vs Seelig’s 53. Patten was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Patten scored 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Henry Patten was very efficient on serve to win 75% (30/40) of his 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Henry broke Seelig 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Patten has a solid record in the last 3 years having won 65% of his matches (63-34). 15-9 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Patten has an overall44-22 record in the last 3 years on hard.
Henry’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Nottingham and M25 Roehampton.
The Brit has a composed 22-15 win-loss record in 2022, 15-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Granby Challenger
Patten has never competed in this tournament before.
Aidan Mayo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-16 | 3-8 | 4-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-28 | 24-15 | 2-5 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-25 | 27-19 | 4-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-8 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 842, Mayo got to the 2nd round after beating Christian Lakoseljac 6-4 6-2, Taha Baadi 3-6 6-1 6-1 and Jiri Vesely 4-6 7-5 6-4.
In the 1st round against Vesely, Aidan recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-4).During the match Mayo scored less points (1) than Vesely. In fact, the world no. 483 won 94 points vs Vesely’s. That means that Mayo was more focused during the important points. Mayo was quite aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about serving, Mayo managed to score 11 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Aidan Mayo lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Mayo put 62% of his first serves in, winning 75% (46/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (19/38) on the 2nd serve. Mayo broke Vesely 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Mayo’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Santo Domingo.
The American has an overall 24-16 win-loss record in 2022, 20-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Patten | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 73 |
| Pts | 73-53 | 246-211 |
| Total Points | 126 | 457 |
| Winners | 30 | 100 |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% |
Patten played 1 match while Mayo competed in 3 matches. Mayo started his run from the qualifications while Patten had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Aidan Mayo lost 2 sets while Henry Patten hasn’t conceded a set so far. Patten has played 6 set(s) less than Mayo (2 vs 8). Therefore, Patten played 54 games less than Mayo. Patten scored 30 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Mayo fired 100 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Patten | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 7.7 |
| 1st in | 40/55 | 141/225 |
| %1st in | 73% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 100/141 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 45/84 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 54% |
Patten fired 6 aces . Mayo blasted 23 aces (7.7 per match). Patten won 75% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Mayo won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Patten | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 13 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 13/27 |
| % Converted | 43% | 48% |
| Conceded | 3 | 15 |
| Saved | 2 | 10 |
| % Saved | 67% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 |
Patten broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Henry conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 13 times with a 48% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Patten | |||
| R1 Seelig |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 73-53 | 73-53 | |
| Total points | 126 | 126 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 40/55 | 40/55 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 30/40 | 30/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 10/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Mayo | |||||
| Q1 Lakoseljac |
Q3 Baadi |
R1 Vesely |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 3-6 6-1 6-1 | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 23 | 32 | 73 | |
| pts | 74-61 | 78-55 | 94-95 | 246-211 | |
| Total points | 135 | 133 | 189 | 457 | |
| Winners | 24 | 30 | 46 | 100 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 38% | 49% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 10 | 2 | 11 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 36/66 | 44/60 | 61/99 | 141/225 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 73% | 62% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 24/36 | 30/44 | 46/61 | 100/141 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 68% | 75% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/30 | 10/16 | 19/38 | 45/84 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 63% | 50% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 3 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 6/9 | 3/7 | 13/27 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 67% | 43% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 | 8 | 15 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 0/2 | 6/8 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 0% | 75% | 155% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLLWLW Tennis Scores in Granby Challenger
- Aidan MayoMayo – Jiri VeselyVesely (4-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Omni KumarKumar – Osgar O’HoisinO’Hoisin (1-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Dan MartinMartin (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Colin MarkesMarkes – Ezekiel ClarkClark (7-64 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Liam DraxlDraxl (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Luke SavilleSaville (6-2 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Justin BoulaisBoulais – Clement ChidekhChidekh (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-3 7-61) – See score progression
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Sekou BangouraBangoura (7-65 7-66) – See score progression
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Aidan MchughMchugh (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Evan ZhuZhu (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Nick ChappellChappell (6-1 6-76 7-64) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Ulises BlanchBlanch (6-74 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Marko StakusicStakusic (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Henry PattenPatten – Kyle SeeligSeelig (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Juan Carlos Manuel AguilarCarlos Manuel Aguilar (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Aidan MchughMchugh (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Evan ZhuZhu (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Liam DraxlDraxl (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – Ugo HumbertHumbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – Aziz DougazDougaz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Justin BoulaisBoulais – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
