Gonzalo Lama and Benjamin Hassan will square off in the 2nd round of the Banja Luka Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on GRANDSTAND. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Benjamin Hassan who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Benjamin Hassan is the pick to win this match.
Benjamin Hassan -> 1.61
Gonzalo Lama -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Gonzalo Lama vs. Benjamin Hassan
There is no head to head record between Gonzalo Lama and Benjamin Hassan since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Gonzalo Lama
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-29 | 3-4 | 15-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-29 | 0-0 | 39-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-19 | 0-1 | 49-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 21-16 | 1-4 | 20-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 248, Gonzalo reached the 2nd round after defeating Frederico Ferreira Silva 6-4 1-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Chilean defeated Ferreira Silva (6-4 1-6 6-3).During the match, Lama scored less points (2) than Ferreira Silva. In fact, the world no. 248 won 77 points vs Ferreira Silva’s. That means that Lama was more focused during the important points. Gonzalo was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lama bagged 3 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults. Gonzalo Lama lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Lama put 56% of his first serves in, winning 62% (28/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (19/36) on the 2nd serve. Lama broke Ferreira Silva 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Lama has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (317-199). 23-21 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Lama has a compiled 306-176 record in the last years on clay.
The Chilean’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Guayaquil.
The Chilean has a compiled 23-22 win-loss record in 2022, 23-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Banja Luka Challenger
The Chilean has never competed in this tournament before.
Benjamin Hassan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-19 | 3-7 | 10-9 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 57-33 | 11-6 | 35-20 | 10-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 7-3 | 21-16 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 21-23 | 2-2 | 17-16 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 315, the Lebanese reached the 2nd round after defeating Yan Bondarevskiy 7-62 6-77 5-1 ret., Peter Fajta 6-2 6-0 and Lucas Miedler 4-6 7-69 6-4.
In the 1st round against Miedler, Hassan recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-69 6-4).During the match Hassan scored less points (2) than Miedler. In fact, the world no. 248 won 115 points vs Miedler’s. That means that Hassan was more focused during the important points. The Lebanese was quite aggressive to blast 47 winners.
About the serving games, Hassan fired 8 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Benjamin Hassan lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Hassan put 59% of his first serves in, winning 66% (47/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (23/50) on the 2nd serve. Benjamin broke Miedler 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
The Lebanese’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Manacor and the Troyes Challenger.
Benjamin has an aggregate 30-20 win-loss record in 2022, 17-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lama | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 79 |
| Pts | 77-79 | 277-243 |
| Total Points | 156 | 520 |
| Winners | 28 | 108 |
| %Winners | 36% | 39% |
Lama played 1 match while Hassan competed in 3 matches. Hassan started his run from the qualifications while Lama had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Gonzalo Lama dropped 1 set, while Benjamin Hassan dropped 2 sets. Lama has played 6 set(s) less than Hassan (3 vs 9). Therefore, Lama played 53 games less than Hassan. Gonzalo scored 28 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Benjamin bagged 108 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lama | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 7.7 |
| 1st in | 45/81 | 153/249 |
| %1st in | 56% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 28/45 | 108/153 |
| %1st pts | 62% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 19/36 | 48/96 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 50% |
Lama managed to score 3 aces . Hassan managed to score 23 aces (7.7 per match). Lama won 62% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Hassan won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lama | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 14 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 14/33 |
| % Converted | 50% | 42% |
| Conceded | 7 | 13 |
| Saved | 3 | 6 |
| % Saved | 43% | 46% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 7 |
Gonzalo broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Gonzalo dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded. Benjamin broke his opponents 14 times with a 42% conversion rate. Benjamin conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 46% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lama | |||
| R1 Ferreira Silva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 77-79 | 77-79 | |
| Total points | 156 | 156 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 45/81 | 45/81 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 28/45 | 28/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/36 | 19/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 43% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Hassan | |||||
| Q1 Bondarevskiy |
Q3 Fajta |
R1 Miedler |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-77 5-1 ret. | 6-2 6-0 | 4-6 7-69 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 14 | 33 | 79 | |
| pts | 112-100 | 50-26 | 115-117 | 277-243 | |
| Total points | 212 | 76 | 232 | 520 | |
| Winners | 44 | 17 | 47 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 34% | 41% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 11 | 4 | 8 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 0 | 5 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 60/92 | 22/36 | 71/121 | 153/249 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 61% | 59% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 44/60 | 17/22 | 47/71 | 108/153 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 77% | 66% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/32 | 11/14 | 23/50 | 48/96 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 79% | 46% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/18 | 5/5 | 4/10 | 14/33 | |
| Converted % | 28% | 100% | 40% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 0 | 10 | 13 | |
| Saved | 0/3 | 0/0 | 6/10 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
L
LWLLWLLWWL Tennis Scores in Banja Luka Challenger
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (4-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Aldin SetkicSetkic (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (6-1 6-73 6-3) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Yevhenii BondarenkoBondarenko (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Mirza BasicBasic (7-67 6-2) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Marko TopoTopo (7-62 3-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Gonzalo LamaLama – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – Alexander WeisWeis (4-6 6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Lucas MiedlerMiedler (4-6 7-69 6-4) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (4-6 7-5 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Dragos Nicolae MadarasNicolae Madaras – Matvey MininMinin (6-3 0-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Ivan GakhovGakhov (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Johan NiklesNikles (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo LamaLama – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Alexey VatutinVatutin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dragos Nicolae MadarasNicolae Madaras – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
