Xiyu Wang and Cadence Brace will face off in the 2nd round of the Championnats Banque Nationale for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:30 pm on COURT 8. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Xiyu Wang who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Xiyu Wang is the pick to win this match.
Xiyu Wang -> 1.107
Cadence Brace -> 6.65
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Xiyu Wang vs. Cadence Brace
There is no head to head record between Xiyu Wang and Cadence Brace since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Xiyu Wang
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-18 | 12-10 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 17-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-25 | 15-10 | 23-11 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-19 | 8-7 | 9-7 | 0-1 | 4-3 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 11-7 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 75 (career-high), the Chinese got to the 2nd round after beating Jamie Loeb 7-64 6-75 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Chinese defeated Loeb (7-64 6-75 6-2). During the match, Wang scored 115 points vs Loeb’s 102. The Chinese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Wang made 12 aces and she committed only 7 double faults. Xiyu Wang lost the serve 3 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Wang put 56% of her first serves in, winning 75% (45/60) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (24/48) on the 2nd serve. Wang broke Loeb 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Wang has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 61% of her matches (153-97). 12-8 on hard in 2022. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Wang has an aggregate92-60 match record in the last 7 years on hard.
Wang’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the W100 Palm Harbor,the W60 Charlottesville,the W100 Charleston and the Valencia.
Xiyu has a compiled 35-19 win-loss record in 2022, 12-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Granby
Wang has never competed in this tournament before.
Cadence Brace
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-10 | 8-4 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-26 | 11-11 | 13-10 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 12-7 | 6-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-3 | 2-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 646 (career-high), Brace got to the 2nd round after defeating Karman Kaur Thandi 6-3 2-6 6-2, Nadiya Kichenok 6-3 6-4 and Kaja Juvan 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Canadian had a good straight sets win against Juvan (7-5 6-3). During the match Brace scored 73 points vs Juvan’s 64. Brace was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Brace was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 4 double faults. Cadence Brace lost the serve twice and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Brace put 65% of her first serves in, winning 67% (31/46) of the points behind her 1st serve and 48% (12/25) on the 2nd serve. The Canadian broke Juvan 4 times after converting 50% of her break points (4/8).
Cadence has a compiled 18-9 win-loss record in 2022, 12-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wang | Brace |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 34 | 65 |
| Pts | 115-102 | 225-194 |
| Total Points | 217 | 419 |
| Winners | 45 | 89 |
| %Winners | 39% | 40% |
Wang played 1 match while Brace competed in 3 matches. Brace started her run from the qualifications while Wang had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Xiyu Wang lost 1 set, while Cadence Brace surrendered 1 set. Wang has played 4 set(s) less than Brace (3 vs 7). Therefore, Wang played 31 games less than Brace. Wang scored 45 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Cadence scored 89 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wang | Brace |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 0.7 |
| 1st in | 60/108 | 130/221 |
| %1st in | 56% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 45/60 | 89/130 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 24/48 | 50/91 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 55% |
Wang blasted 12 aces . Brace fired 2 aces (0.7 per match). Wang won 75% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Brace won 68% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wang | Brace |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 11 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 11/23 |
| % Converted | 56% | 48% |
| Conceded | 7 | 19 |
| Saved | 4 | 13 |
| % Saved | 57% | 68% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 6 |
Xiyu broke her opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Chinese surrendered her serve 3 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded. The Canadian broke her opponents 11 times with a 48% conversion rate. Cadence conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 68% of the break points that she conceded.
| Wang | |||
| R1 Loeb |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-75 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 115-102 | 115-102 | |
| Total points | 217 | 217 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 60/108 | 60/108 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 45/60 | 45/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/48 | 24/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Brace | |||||
| Q1 Kaur Thandi |
Q3 Kichenok |
R1 Juvan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | 6-3 6-4 | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 19 | 21 | 65 | |
| pts | 84-76 | 68-54 | 73-64 | 225-194 | |
| Total points | 160 | 122 | 137 | 419 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | 31 | 89 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 43% | 42% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 4 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 47/85 | 37/65 | 46/71 | 130/221 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 57% | 65% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 29/47 | 29/37 | 31/46 | 89/130 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 78% | 67% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/38 | 18/28 | 12/25 | 50/91 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 64% | 48% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 2 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 2/7 | 4/8 | 11/23 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 29% | 50% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 3 | 6 | 19 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 3/3 | 4/6 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 100% | 67% | 227% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWLWLW
WWWWWLLWLW Tennis Scores in Granby
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – Harriet DartDart (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Boy WesterhofWesterhof – Maxime HamouHamou (6-3 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Yannick JankovitsJankovits (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Niels DeseinDesein (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gleb SakharovSakharov – Alexis MusialekMusialek (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Hugo DaubiasDaubias (6-2 4-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gregoire JacqJacq – Tim PuetzPuetz (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Darya KasatkinaKasatkina – Magdalena FrechFrech (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BondarBondar – Tatjana MariaMaria (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Diane ParryParry – Tereza MartincovaMartincova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Katherine SebovSebov – Daria GavrilovaGavrilova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
